Ram Posted September 3, 2007 Posted September 3, 2007 The last nail in the coffin - http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6275966.stm Here , some Afghan is claiming their fast bowlers than India's coz they were bowling at 140-145 kmph. I know pace means zilch in actual terms. Its the talent and skill of the bowler that matters most. But just to shut these morons , who will probably get ass whooped if they ever get onto a cricket field to play a match against India , we need a quick bowler who can touch 150 Ks...
kumble_rocks Posted September 3, 2007 Posted September 3, 2007 But just to shut these morons , who will probably get ass whooped if they ever get onto a cricket field to play a match against India , we need a quick bowler who can touch 150 Ks... Dream On !:D
MundaPakistani Posted September 3, 2007 Posted September 3, 2007 "Faster than Indians and on par with Pakistanis".:D The last nail in the coffin - http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6275966.stm Here , some Afghan is claiming their fast bowlers than India's coz they were bowling at 140-145 kmph. I know pace means zilch in actual terms. Its the talent and skill of the bowler that matters most. But just to shut these morons , who will probably get ass whooped if they ever get onto a cricket field to play a match against India , we need a quick bowler who can touch 150 Ks... I am surprised that you say that MM! It's no coincident that at least 90% of the great fast bowlers of the past have been supremely quick.
Ram Posted September 3, 2007 Author Posted September 3, 2007 "Faster than Indians and on par with Pakistanis".:D I am surprised that you say that MM! It's no coincident that at least 90% of the great fast bowlers of the past have been supremely quick. MP, I assume fast here means - bowling at more than 145Ks consistently. And who does come to your mind when talking past great fast bowlers ( from 1980s onwards) ? Lillee , Botham , Kapil , Holding, Garner , Marshall , Hadlee , Ambrose, Wasim , Waqar , Imran , Walsh , Mcgrath etc ? How many in this list bowled at 145 + 4 out of 6 balls an over ? 3 maybe 4 ? Pace is good MP , but ultimately its the skill.
Predator_05 Posted September 3, 2007 Posted September 3, 2007 These talibans should forget cricket and stick to doing what they do best - humping camels and firing AK-47's at UN troops.
kumble_rocks Posted September 3, 2007 Posted September 3, 2007 These talibans should forget cricket and stick to doing what they do best - humping camels and firing AK-47's at UN troops. :haha::haha::haha:
living Posted September 3, 2007 Posted September 3, 2007 PROTEIN DEFICIENCY I can't simply believe the fact that such a HUGE nutritional blunder is happening IN ALL SPORTS in India, and no one's doing ****.
living Posted September 3, 2007 Posted September 3, 2007 MP, I assume fast here means - bowling at more than 145Ks consistently. And who does come to your mind when talking past great fast bowlers ( from 1980s onwards) ? Lillee , Botham , Kapil , Holding, Garner , Marshall , Hadlee , Ambrose, Wasim , Waqar , Imran , Walsh , Mcgrath etc ? . Lee, Akhtar, Bond, Flintoff - The current cream of the crop
Lurker Posted September 3, 2007 Posted September 3, 2007 I know pace means zilch in actual terms. Its the talent and skill of the bowler that matters most. Pace of a bowler is analogus to the size of a man's you-know-what. If you are on the plus side/size it doesnt mean anything in itself, but if you are on the short side you feel it shall go against you, even if it doesnt. :regular_smile: Personally I would love to see an Indian bowler cranking 95 mph plus on a regularly basis. Much as I am happy to see a Zaheer or a Sreesanth win us series in England or West Indies, a full blast pace bowler shall complete our attack. xx
yoda Posted September 3, 2007 Posted September 3, 2007 if we need a 150k bowler to whip the afghans in cricket, may be we should stop playing?
Chandan Posted September 4, 2007 Posted September 4, 2007 "Faster than Indians and on par with Pakistanis".:D I am surprised that you say that MM! It's no coincident that at least 90% of the great fast bowlers of the past have been supremely quick. Supremely quick means?? There was no speed guns to measure their speed. So only batsmen can say how quick they were. And many batsmen tell us that speed gun might not be showing a batsman to be bowling at 145+ but his bowling comes extremely quickly after pitching. So isn't it all relative??
Ram Posted September 4, 2007 Author Posted September 4, 2007 **How come that every time i swear ( which in itself is once in a blue moon) , it gets edited , while if someone else does , it stays ? :angry_smile:**
Chandan Posted September 4, 2007 Posted September 4, 2007 **How come that every time i swear ( which in itself is once in a blue moon) ' date=' it gets edited , while if someone else does , it stays ? :angry_smile:**[/quote'] Where did you swear and it got edited??
Ram Posted September 4, 2007 Author Posted September 4, 2007 Where did you swear and it got edited?? My thread topic was bit... err... undiplomatic and had some language not fitting public presence... Cant say anything more. You dont actually expect me to swear again do you ? :D
Chandan Posted September 4, 2007 Posted September 4, 2007 No. I don't expect you to swear EVER on a public forum!:regular_smile:
Ram Posted September 4, 2007 Author Posted September 4, 2007 No. I don't expect you to swear EVER on a public forum!:regular_smile: Whats a forum without swearing ? Infact many people come here ONLY to swear.
Cricketics Posted September 4, 2007 Posted September 4, 2007 mm i know why ur post got edited when u were swearing.. i thought and thought and thought and then i came up with this - today is Janmashtmi, and hence the mod or whoever edited ur thread was aware of that and hence didn't want to hear or see such abusive lang.. hence the deletion of ur wordz..
Ram Posted September 4, 2007 Author Posted September 4, 2007 mm i know why ur post got edited when u were swearing.. i thought and thought and thought and then i came up with this - today is Janmashtmi, and hence the mod or whoever edited ur thread was aware of that and hence didn't want to hear or see such abusive lang.. hence the deletion of ur wordz.. :haha: Cant believe you have actually come up with a reason for it, especially the Janmashtami part. You are simply awesome, C'tics.
zubinpepsi Posted September 4, 2007 Posted September 4, 2007 Whats a forum without swearing ? Infact many people come here ONLY to swear. Top class...:hysterical:
King Posted September 4, 2007 Posted September 4, 2007 I'm quite happy it was edited. I still can't quite fathom why we would want to be swearing to make a statement. But for this forums if I were visiting any and I found expletives in the topic title I would quite avoid the forums. It is better to keep it clean considering young ones are among that visit the forums and it won't be a work safe website if people are cussing and swearing in every sentence.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now