The Outsider Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 by his logic yuvraj should bat at no 7 and ashwin at number 4 :wall: That's what Lordji is saying anyways - bat Ashwin and Jadeja at number 4/5. Dhoni: Hey Michael (Clarke) which number are you batting at? Clarke: Number 4, whose your number 4? Dhoni: Not sure yet, Ashwin or maybe Jadeja. Clarke: :WTF: :hysterical::hysterical: Link to comment
Lord Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 That's what Lordji is saying anyways - bat Ashwin and Jadeja at number 4/5. Dhoni: Hey Michael (Clarke) which number are you batting at? Clarke: Number 4, whose your number 4? Dhoni: Not sure yet, Ashwin or maybe Jadeja. Clarke: :WTF: :hysterical::hysterical: Clarke kahan se beech me aa gya?I'm talking ODIs.n 5-6,not 4:P Link to comment
Old guy Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 lord what happened? :omg: this isnt ipl..save ur epic posts for it ..for now be boring :beee: btw i want to make one thing very clear ..u dont fix ur top order collapse by playing bits and pieces cricketers at number 7 and number 8 u fix it by changing top order players who are failing...if yuvraj cannot bat against swiing replace him with proper batsman and play proper bowlers..thats how we won world cup and england doing the opposite never really played well..remember yardy and co ? :P Link to comment
Lord Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 lord what happened? :omg: this isnt ipl..save ur epic posts for it ..for now be boring :beee: btw i want to make one thing very clear ..u dont fix ur top order collapse by playing bits and pieces cricketers at number 7 and number 8 u fix it by changing top order players who are failing...if yuvraj cannot bat against swiing replace him with proper batsman and play proper bowlers..thats how we won world cup and england doing the opposite never really played well..remember yardy and co ? :P was just trying to think out of the box:(( we won WC on pattas,so that example doesnt work here:P Its more about the approach of batsmen n the way they play than ability.its about maimising them by putting them into comfort zones anyway its not gonna happen,so lets leave it:--D Link to comment
Old guy Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 was just trying to think out of the box:(( we won WC on pattas,so that example doesnt work here:P Its more about the approach of batsmen n the way they play than ability.its about maimising them by putting them into comfort zones anyway its not gonna happen,so lets leave it:--D We had solid batting line up Sachin was best batsman in world then Sehwag was OK,gauti and kohli solid Then yuvraj was fit and came into form and honestly with solid top order we only needed hitters in lower order Do u think current line up will even win on pattas? Link to comment
Lord Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 We had solid batting line up Sachin was best batsman in world then Sehwag was OK,gauti and kohli solid Then yuvraj was fit and came into form and honestly with solid top order we only needed hitters in lower order Do u think current line up will even win on pattas? maybe not.but thats not the point Link to comment
Old guy Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 maybe not.but thats not the point What's ur point? If we are gonna play jaddu as bowler then stop selecting him in team as all rounder cost a bowler bats in front of him Also failures of top order cannot be solved by dropping genuine bowlers and playing so called no Rounders in place of them to support batting Link to comment
Lord Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 What's ur point? If we are gonna play jaddu as bowler then stop selecting him in team as all rounder cost a bowler bats in front of him Also failures of top order cannot be solved by dropping genuine bowlers and playing so called no Rounders in place of them to support batting Jaddu is an allrounder for sure.Ashwin batting ahead of him was wrong imo. which genuine bowler has been dropped?Dinda:hmmm: Link to comment
indiaregulator Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Thankfully Tredwell, you won't have to do any adjustment when Swann gets back. Link to comment
Old guy Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Jaddu is an allrounder for sure.Ashwin batting ahead of him was wrong imo. which genuine bowler has been dropped?Dinda:hmmm: Play any real spinner in place of jaddu who perfroms once in 20 matches I will go with pathan when he is back And spinner well let's blood in some youngster Link to comment
Lord Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Play any real spinner in place of jaddu who perfroms once in 20 matches I will go with pathan when he is back And spinner well let's blood in some youngster Pathan is injured otherwise he'll take a seamer(unlucky)'s place there's no spinner good to qualify as a specialist atm.also new rules mean we'll have to play 5 bowlers.Jaddu is doing decent as a spinner since his comeback. he performed in 2 back to back games,so lets wait n see for a while Link to comment
Vilander Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 dhoni wanted ashwin to defend till consolidation then jadeja can come in and stroke.. it was strategy might work some other time Link to comment
Old guy Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Pathan is injured otherwise he'll take a seamer(unlucky)'s place there's no spinner good to qualify as a specialist atm.also new rules mean we'll have to play 5 bowlers.Jaddu is doing decent as a spinner since his comeback. he performed in 2 back to back games,so lets wait n see for a while ok then treat him as bowler wht if he has to drop one bowler in coming games? his excuse for keeping jaddu will be tht he is all rounder and this guy has not done anything since his come back with bat Link to comment
Lord Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 ok then treat him as bowler wht if he has to drop one bowler in coming games? his excuse for keeping jaddu will be tht he is all rounder and this guy has not done anything since his come back with bat if hes doing good as a bowler he'll stay:idunno: hes doing okay with the bat too.bats too low imo point is a speciialist spinner has to be very good to replace him,otherwise his batting n fielding surely n deservedly gets him a bit of a rope Link to comment
Old guy Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 if hes doing good as a bowler he'll stay:idunno: hes doing okay with the bat too.bats too low imo point is a speciialist spinner has to be very good to replace him,otherwise his batting n fielding surely n deservedly gets him a bit of a rope his batting sucks bhajji did better job Link to comment
Lord Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 his batting sucks bhajji did better job really?how many 50s did Bhajji have at the age of 24? he doesnt hv the power game,but can hang around imo. Link to comment
Old guy Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 really?how many 50s did Bhajji have at the age of 24? he doesnt hv the power game,but can hang around imo. no he cannot if conditions are tough he cannot even survive can hang around on pattas where u need to hit sixes Link to comment
Lord Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 no he cannot if conditions are tough he cannot even survive can hang around on pattas where u need to hit sixes hung around in these games http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/474479.html http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/416241.html http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/434264.html http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/518957.html not pattas by any means those n he scored quick in these pattas http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/430886.html http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/416240.html http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/521218.html http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/434259.html Link to comment
Old guy Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 even in links u gave apart of one good inning vs england everything else is mediocre stuff and even tailender can have those highs 24 runs really? australia still dont consider johnson all rounder and he is 10 times better batsman Link to comment
Lord Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 even in links u gave apart of one good inning vs england everything else is mediocre stuff and even tailender can have those highs 24 runs really? australia still dont consider johnson all rounder and he is 10 times better batsman 24 runs was at Perth wen he needed to stick under pressure,so included.others r good innings even by numbers considering he number he bats at. yes but we dont hv a Johnson,thier fast bowler are ten times better than ours too,doesnt make sense Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now