Guest BossBhai Posted September 8, 2007 Share Posted September 8, 2007 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
simba28 Posted September 8, 2007 Share Posted September 8, 2007 Awesome achievement.. but hate to see the fact that we cover up a dissapointment by showing past glory.. I Know the test series has just finished but its childish to say we won a series abroad and now nothing else matters Link to comment
beetle Posted September 8, 2007 Share Posted September 8, 2007 :two_thumbs_up: for the test series.... and 4-3 is not so bad....would have loved to see the team win ...:musicus: Link to comment
MundaPakistani Posted September 8, 2007 Share Posted September 8, 2007 :two_thumbs_up: The real deal:two_thumbs_up: having said lets not try to conceal the average performance in the ODIs Link to comment
coverpoint Posted September 8, 2007 Share Posted September 8, 2007 I think the test win showed that our team still has guts and the ability to dig deep, The ODI series was a correct representation of our position in world cricket as a slow and unfit team of oldies. Fair results both of these Link to comment
simba28 Posted September 8, 2007 Share Posted September 8, 2007 I think the test win showed that our team still has guts and the ability to dig deep, The ODI series was a correct representation of our position in world cricket as a slow and unfit team of oldies. Fair results both of these true that Link to comment
yoda Posted September 8, 2007 Share Posted September 8, 2007 yes. overall i would say we did better than expected. Link to comment
Anakin Posted September 8, 2007 Share Posted September 8, 2007 yes. overall i would say we did better than expected.x2 Definitely Link to comment
Chandan Posted September 8, 2007 Share Posted September 8, 2007 :two_thumbs_up: The real deal:two_thumbs_up: having said lets not try to conceal the average performance in the ODIs It was below average!! 1. Ordinary seam attack 2. Extremely bad fielding 3. Terrible running between the wicket 4. Over-dependence on the openers to get runs as well as see off the new ball. With so many defencies, if you won three matches, it was only because of individual brilliance and nothing else! Link to comment
Chandan Posted September 8, 2007 Share Posted September 8, 2007 I think the test win showed that our team still has guts and the ability to dig deep, The ODI series was a correct representation of our position in world cricket as a slow and unfit team of oldies. Fair results both of these How many oldies are there in the ODI team of 11 players, CP? Link to comment
Aditi Posted September 8, 2007 Share Posted September 8, 2007 :two_thumbs_up: The real deal:two_thumbs_up: having said lets not try to conceal the average performance in the ODIs "average" is a very kind term for what is really was. Link to comment
bigdhoni7 Posted September 8, 2007 Share Posted September 8, 2007 We worked hard for the test series victory. But hopefully the indian media doesn't go overboard with us not winning the odi series and just showcase the positive's of the entire tour. Link to comment
The Outsider Posted September 8, 2007 Share Posted September 8, 2007 How many oldies are there in the ODI team of 11 players' date=' CP?[/quote'] Munaf, Powar, Ganguly, Dravid, Tendulkar, RP Singh, and Zaheer Link to comment
observer1 Posted September 8, 2007 Share Posted September 8, 2007 add chawla to the list, based on his fielding today Link to comment
Dravid Posted September 8, 2007 Share Posted September 8, 2007 ^that hippie dhoni too Link to comment
Guest Hiten. Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 I think the test win showed that our team still has guts and the ability to dig deep, The ODI series was a correct representation of our position in world cricket as a slow and unfit team of oldies. Fair results both of these hard and firm thoughts there mate :two_thumbs_up:.... i got to agree with that Link to comment
feverpitch Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 I think the test win showed that our team still has guts and the ability to dig deep, The ODI series was a correct representation of our position in world cricket as a slow and unfit team of oldies. Isn't it the oldies whose 100+ partnerships at the top ensured where we are now? Or would a 7-0, 6-1 scoreline suited you better? Link to comment
Guest Hiten. Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 Isn't it the oldies whose 100+ partnerships at the top ensured where we are now? Or would a 7-0' date=' 6-1 scoreline suited you better?[/quote'] He's concern is fielding..... we were let down in the series due to pathetic fielding and bowling Link to comment
coverpoint Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 Isn't it the oldies whose 100+ partnerships at the top ensured where we are now? Or would a 7-0' date=' 6-1 scoreline suited you better?[/quote'] Ofcourse it is. Unlike you I am happy to give credit where credit is due. Ganguly (despite his tin roof act today) did play well in this series... specially the last couple of games. BUT it is also true that he was one of our worst fielders (give or take a munaf). We need to remember that this pommie team we played was still one of the worst ODI units in the world. How would we fare against a Lanka or Aus? So to move forward we need to get better in the field. Just one Uthappa coming in for a slow fielder made a huge difference to our fielding in the last couple of games. We need to make sure that future games are played with a younger .... ok maybe thats not the right word ... fitter team. We need to weigh the future and balance between experience of the Ganguly's vs the importance of building a better fielding team. We need to make sure that not more than 2-3 slow fielders/runners are in the team. If I had to drop one of the three maharathis I would say SG has to be the first one to go. Then SRT should for the next year or 2 play only 1 in 3 ODI's ... just keep him fit and healthy. Replace t hem with younger and fitter players ...like Uthappa (a player all you gangulians dragged through the mud .... just because he was brought in by GC and had taken SG's spot) Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now