Indian Batting Since SAF Series

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[Anakin]

Grand total of 36 run difference for the batsman that deserves to be dropped :haha:

[King]

Ganguly, Laxman and Karthik are our top consistent performers. Any average under 40 is not top class. Rahul has scored only 1 50 in the last 12 innings. Wonder when was the last time he was out of touch for this long.

[coffee_rules]

Ganguly' date=' Laxman and Karthik are our top consistent performers. Any average under 40 is not top class. Rahul has scored only 1 50 in the last 12 innings. Wonder when was the last time he was out of touch for this long.[/quote'] I thought he scored a 100 in BD and 1 50 in Eng in last 7 innings. Between 1999-00 NZ home series 2nd test, 1999-00 Aus series and 2000 SA series, in a total of 8 tests, Dravid did not score a single 50 in 16 innings. That is his longest bad stint.

[King]

I guess this doesn't take into consideration the test series against Bangladesh in Bangladesh. I don't think it should be excluded to be honest. Only Indians do this though. Why exclude the number of runs scored against Bangladesh?

[Bumper]

What is this new criteria, total no. of runs, never heard that before ?:haha: Dravid's form is really worrying signs for India.

[Ram]

Dravid averages 22 ! Shocking !

[yoda]

Any table that Ganguly heads has to be bogus. :haha:

[kumble_rocks]

Ganguly has shown consistency in both Tests and ODI when it comes to maintaining a S/R of around 50 .:D

[yoda]

Ganguly has shown consistency in both Tests and ODI when it comes to maintaining a S/R of around 50 .:D

that's because there is a common goal - hold onto your place in the team.

[fineleg]

Dravid averages 22 ! Shocking !

For Test cricket, we desperately need THE WALL to get back to his stonewalling best.

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[Bumper]

averages can be misleading if we have a small sample size ... and also in cases of low scoring series ... most of the 2 series vs SAF and Eng were low scoring Tests and even a single not out bumps your average .... heck AK had the best average for the Eng series .... :haha:

If not out, bumping the average is your concern, count the not outs as outs & compute the avg. In any case, i dont think we should discount a batsman for being not out (unless thats the only knock that falsely boosts the avg). But total no. of runs does not make sense to me.

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[Guest dada_rocks]

Poor dada he needs to be dropepd for outscorring everybody