kubrickian Posted February 1, 2013 Author Posted February 1, 2013 Almost 10 (or probably more) wrong decisions in India-NZ series. Same for India-England series. I guess you're supporting this. The technology is clearly not good enough. It will just create more controversies.
Trichromatic Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 The technology is clearly not good enough. It will just create more controversies. What about umpires? How many controversies it had created? Can you remember 5-10 wrong decisions because of DRS in a match in last 2 years? Here is what you can do. List all wrong decisions by DRS in all formats of game and compare it with just wrong decisions by umpires in single series.
adi B Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 The technology is clearly not good enough. It will just create more controversies. its good,better than umpires making howlers match after match..drs is good for the game,always has,always will
Crookbond Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 What about umpires? How many controversies it had created? Can you remember 5-10 wrong decisions because of DRS in a match in last 2 years? Here is what you can do. List all wrong decisions by DRS in all formats of game and compare it with just wrong decisions by umpires in single series. How is that even possible to do? You feel the ball missed the leg stump and the DRS thinks the ball clips the leg stump. Who is right - umpire or DRS?
Zap_Brannigan Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 What about umpires? How many controversies it had created? Can you remember 5-10 wrong decisions because of DRS in a match in last 2 years? Here is what you can do. List all wrong decisions by DRS in all formats of game and compare it with just wrong decisions by umpires in single series. what about those decisions that were wrong but couldn't be appealed because the team ran out of appeal or wasnt appealed in fear of running out of appeals. What about those ones that hit leg stump but are given randomly based on what the umpire first thought, even if it hits the stumps in the same place in 2 consecutive deliveries. DRS, in its current form, might be better than without it completely, but it is still riddled with holes. The technology, i think, is good enough. Even if it is not 100% accurate, it is still a level playing field. But the implementation is horrible.
Dumbbells Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 DRS needs a smart brain. I guess Dhoni would use it nicely if they allow it. Dhoni overturned lot of umpire's decision in the world cup with DRS.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now