Texy Posted February 27, 2013 Posted February 27, 2013 You guys do know that the pakis aka jamat e islami went on a strike by saying pakistan zindabad' date=' right? And they also burned the bangladesi flag... #shuorerbaccha[/quote'] Haramjaada guloke shohorer maajh khaane phaashi deoya uchit I was reading up on how Jamaat gets financed. Apparently they channel their money through the charities in UK and US and receive zakat from oblivious Muslim communities around the world under the guise of Muslim causes.
veer Posted February 27, 2013 Posted February 27, 2013 Haramjaada guloke shohorer maajh khaane phaashi deoya uchit I was reading up on how Jamaat gets financed. Apparently they channel their money through the charities in UK and US and receive zakat from oblivious Muslim communities around the world under the guise of Muslim causes. Damn F*ers... dont know when are they going to progress.
Muloghonto Posted February 27, 2013 Posted February 27, 2013 ru mad....it is densely populated country...with no natural resources..education and general quality of life is poor...every year there is lots of famines etc...plus although they are generally tolerant muslims (owing to the rich bengali culture and heritage)..there are sour apples everywhere..there is absolutely no need to join bangladesh to india...as we by itself have millions of problems... Union with Bangladesh, as you said, comes with these negetive consequences. But what are the positive consequences? Lets examine: a) Bangladesh is extremely rich in water. Some would say, too rich- they get flooded every year in the rainy season. The total volume of freshwater passing through Bangladesh every minute is comparable to the volume of total freshwater passing through North America. By efficient management & diversion of these water resources (which are hampered by the diplomatic red tape between two sovereign nations), India can solve drought problems in the North & west while simultaneously solving the flood problem in Bangladesh. b) Chittagong is the best natural port in the Bay of Bengal north of Vishakapatnam and having Bangladesh join us would see an explosion in trade and GDP in the seven sister states, as sea access to trade would be massively improved. c) Merger with Bangladesh removes the problem of the most vulnerable & strategically important part of India- the chicken's neck corridor, which connects the seven sister states to rest of India via a narrow 50-60 km thick patch in Northern Bengal/Bihar. d) Massively reduces our BSF overhead, as a merger with Bangladesh massively reduces the total border length of India. Bangladesh-India border is over 4000 kms long, while the Bangladesh-Burma border (which would be the only addition to Indian border if Bangladesh merged with us) is less than 200 kms long.
Jersey #10 Posted February 27, 2013 Posted February 27, 2013 Where is the international media? This needs to be seen around the world.
Tiger-Don Posted February 27, 2013 Author Posted February 27, 2013 Haramjaada guloke shohorer maajh khaane phaashi deoya uchit I was reading up on how Jamaat gets financed. Apparently they channel their money through the charities in UK and US and receive zakat from oblivious Muslim communities around the world under the guise of Muslim causes. Oder dhon kete, kukur ke khawano uchit.
Texy Posted February 28, 2013 Posted February 28, 2013 Delwar Hossain Sayedee, 73, vice-president of the Jamaat-e-Islami party, was found guilty of charges of mass killing, rape, arson, looting and forcing minority Hindus to convert to Islam during the 1971 war of independence from Pakistan, lawyers and tribunal officials said. SOURCE This is a great victory for Shahbag protestors and everyone who sacrificed their lives as a result of actions taken by this pig.
King Khan Posted February 28, 2013 Posted February 28, 2013 Countrywide violence sparks in Bangladesh over death rulling of an popular Islamic preacher cum Jamaat-e-Islami leader in on going 1971 war crime cases. In coming times BD gonna face very hard problems. Chance of a civil war type clash between hardline Islamists & Atheists along with other minorities are very forseeable. IMO Its not gonna that easy for secular society when BD got massive presence of radicalist & fundamentalist in them and specially with huge support and fire power to answer back Shahbag protest. At least 30 people were killed in Bangladesh in a wave of violence on Thursday as Islamists reacted furiously to a ruling that one of their leaders must hang for war crimes during the 1971 independence conflict. "At least 10,000 Jamaat supporters attacked us. We were forced to open fire," Rahman said. About 300 people, including scores of policemen, were also injured, doctors, police and local media said. detail at - http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/30-killed-in-protests-in-bangladesh-over-islamist-s-death-sentence-336783
Asim Posted February 28, 2013 Posted February 28, 2013 Thank you India. Thabk you! I knew the indians loved us no matter how much they try to hide it. the reason is rocket science?
Texy Posted February 28, 2013 Posted February 28, 2013 Countrywide violence sparks in Bangladesh over death rulling of an popular Islamic preacher cum Jamaat-e-Islami leader in on going 1971 war crime cases. In coming times BD gonna face very hard problems. Chance of a civil war type clash between hardline Islamists & Atheists along with other minorities are very forseeable. IMO Its not gonna that easy for secular society when BD got massive presence of radicalist & fundamentalist in them and specially with huge support and fire power to answer back Shahbag protest. Sayedee, now best known in Bangladesh as a firebrand preacher, was convicted for setting ablaze 25 houses in a Hindu village and abetting the murders of two people including a Hindu man, according to a copy of the verdict. He led a pro-Pakistani militia who abducted three Hindu sisters and raped them for three days at a Pakistani camp, said the verdict. He also forced at least 100 Hindus to convert to Islam and made them say Islamic prayers, it added. What a sick faak.
King Khan Posted March 2, 2013 Posted March 2, 2013 Idea of Bangladesh With the death toll climbing from violence unleashed by supporters of the Jamaat-e-Islami following Thursday's verdict, sentencing Jamaat vice-president Delwar Hossain Sayedee to death, Bangladesh's deep divisions appear to have taken the country hostage, if not by surprise. The surprise had come earlier first, when the process begun by Sheikh Hasina's government, to try people accused of war crimes in 1971, came under international censure and was nearly derailed by domestic upheaval. And then, when thousands of students and Bangladeshis from all walks of life poured into Dhaka's Shahbag Square, demanding that Jamaat leader Abdul Quader Mollah be given capital punishment instead of a life sentence. The fresh violence is evidence of the continuing war for Bangladesh's political soul. The struggle is as much for the state's cultural-political identity as for a people's definition of who they are and what they want to be. This is framed by the religious-secular divide. Locked therein are two competing narratives of Bangladesh that of the majority, which fought to liberate the country and preserve its linguistic-cultural identity, and that of the Jamaat, whose older members were Razakars, or collaborators. Not only was the Jamaat opposed to Bangladesh's independence, but the Razakars allegedly killed, raped and plundered Bangladeshis along with the Pakistan army. These forces used the religious space to disrupt Bangladesh's democratic evolution as envisioned in 1971. Today, these forces are fighting back, and their desperation was seen in the murder last month of Ahmed Rajib Haider, a blogger and organiser of the Shahbag protests. The imperative now is to guarantee the safety of citizens, and to secure the country for history. As far as India is concerned, it must stand by the progressive forces in Dhaka, like Hasina, who has transformed Indo-Bangla relations and reduced one worry for New Delhi about its volatile neighbourhood. As President Pranab Mukherjee prepares to visit Dhaka, Delhi must work with urgency to deliver on Teesta water-sharing and the land boundary agreement. That is the best help India can provide its friends in Bangladesh in this turbulent moment. - See more at: http://www.indianexpress.com/news/idea-of-bangladesh/1081888/#sthash.u11rYvQ7.dpuf
1983-2011 Posted March 2, 2013 Posted March 2, 2013 New clashes erupt in Bangladesh Fresh clashes have resulted in more deaths in Bangladesh during violence in response to the death sentence handed to an opposition leader. Police say that at least 44 people have now been killed as clashes continued into a second day on Friday. Riots erupted in the capital city of Dhaka when Delwar Hossain Sayedee was sentenced to death. Dozens Sayedee supporters smashed several vehicles in Dhaka's central Malibagh district, witnesses said. Baton-wielding police dispersed the protesters. Security was tightened around thousands of mosques across the Muslim-majority nation, with border guards deployed in major cities. About 10,000 policemen were on patrol and the government deployed border guards as reinforcement to prevent more violence. The Jamaat-e-Islami, country's largest Islamic party, had called on supporters to converge on the country's mosques on Friday to offer a special mass prayer for those killed during the violence. "We must stay alert. Jamaat and its allies are trying to plunge the nation into anarchy," Junior Law Minister Quamrul Islam said. "We will not allow them to destroy democracy." In Thursday's violence, more than 300 were injured across the country after Jamaat's vice president Delwar Hossain Sayedee, 73, was sentenced to death for war crimes committed during the 1971 independence war. Sayedee was found guilty of murder, religious persecution and rape by a war crimes tribunal hearing cases dating back to the liberation war against Pakistan. Jamaat-e-Islami backed Pakistan during the independence war but denies their supporters were involved in atrocities. He was the third person to be convicted by the tribunal whose previous verdicts have also been met with outrage from party supporters who say the process is more about score settling than delivering justice. The latest death on Friday brought the overall toll to 51 since the tribunal delivered its first verdict on January 21. Secular protests Earlier this month, the tribunal sentenced Abdul Qader Molla, Jamaat's assistant secretary-general, to life imprisonment. Molla's verdict enraged secular protesters, tens of thousands of whom have since poured onto Dhaka's Shahbag Square to reject the "lighter sentence" and demand the execution of Jamaat leaders. Another Jamaat leader, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, was sentenced to death in absentia last month. Seven other top leaders of Jamaat are on trial for their alleged role in the atrocities during the liberation war. Sheikh Hasina Wajed, the Bangladesh prime minister, set up the tribunal in 2010 to investigate abuses during the independence war which, by many accounts, claimed about three million lives and during which thousands of Bengali women were raped. The tribunal, a domestic body with no international oversight, has been criticised by the opposition as targeting its members. But the scale of recent secular protests show a large section of Bangladeshis support moves to punish those linked to atrocities during the liberation war. http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia/2013/03/20133165748731729.html
Params7 Posted March 2, 2013 Posted March 2, 2013 The sooner any Islamic country out there separates religion from state, the sooner that specific country heads on a macro path of progression.
Recommended Posts