Texan Posted May 8, 2013 Posted May 8, 2013 Banga Boys lost the match today to Zimbabwe, but proved beyond doubt that they are more sporting than the Sri Lankans. They did not resort to bowling a wide or a no-ball when only one run was needed to win and Sibanda batting at the other end was on 99 not out. Contrast this with what Sangakkara, Dilshan and Randiv plotted in the ODI against India to deny Sehwag a hundred. What a disgrace these 3 were! aavdA6iWP7A
suraj Posted May 9, 2013 Posted May 9, 2013 Very shameful incident from Lankans and really stupid too- just to avoid a century for a batsman utter shyte:finger:
Texan Posted May 9, 2013 Author Posted May 9, 2013 Very shameful incident from Lankans and really stupid too- just to avoid a century for a batsman utter shyte:finger: Even school boys wouldn't have acted like that :winky:
Square Drive Posted May 9, 2013 Posted May 9, 2013 Smart work from the fielding team :winky: It's such a shame for the game that these Indian players always prioritise personal records :headshake:
JaFanatic Posted May 9, 2013 Posted May 9, 2013 they are better than the lankans as a team as well :agree:
Texan Posted May 10, 2013 Author Posted May 10, 2013 Smart work from the fielding team :winky: It's such a shame for the game that these Indian players always prioritise personal records :headshake: Sehwag didn't prioritize personal record in this case. He didn't compromise the team cause in any way. This was about Sri Lankan players behaving childishly. Even kids don't do things like that actually. What's worse, it wasn't just the bowler acting by himself.... it was the captain, vice-captain and bowler all conspiring to deny Sehwag a well deserved hundred.
Zelig Posted May 10, 2013 Posted May 10, 2013 Here is a question... How different is, a batsman not walking having nicked the ball from what the Lankans did? :hmmm: Do give me the bull that the umps are there to do the job PS: I don't advocate both :bow:
Crookbond Posted May 11, 2013 Posted May 11, 2013 Here is a question... How different is, a batsman not walking having nicked the ball from what the Lankans did? :hmmm: Do give me the bull that the umps are there to do the job PS: I don't advocate both :bow: How is this different from killing a fly? How is this different from wearing a lungi? How is this different from particle physics?
Zelig Posted May 11, 2013 Posted May 11, 2013 How is this different from killing a fly? How is this different from wearing a lungi? How is this different from particle physics? Wow...legend :clap:
The Outsider Posted May 11, 2013 Posted May 11, 2013 Here is a question... How different is, a batsman not walking having nicked the ball from what the Lankans did? :hmmm: Do give me the bull that the umps are there to do the job PS: I don't advocate both :bow: This is a case of deliberate under performance - a batsman not walking on a nick is a case of evening things out.
nikred Posted May 11, 2013 Posted May 11, 2013 Here is a question... How different is, a batsman not walking having nicked the ball from what the Lankans did? :hmmm: Do give me the bull that the umps are there to do the job PS: I don't advocate both :bow: Batsman not walking is in interest of his teams victory. What Lankans did was downright sad, they intentionally lost the game, even though it was inevitable, just so that Sehwag does not get his 100. SAD.
Zelig Posted May 11, 2013 Posted May 11, 2013 This is a case of deliberate under performance - a batsman not walking on a nick is a case of evening things out. I have heard current/ex-players say so, but I don't agree. Batsman not walking is in interest of his teams victory. What Lankans did was downright sad' date=' they intentionally lost the game, even though it was inevitable, just so that Sehwag does not get his 100. SAD.[/quote'] :hmmm: Fair enough. PS: I think Cricket is the only sport where personal milestone is given a lot of importance.
Square Drive Posted May 11, 2013 Posted May 11, 2013 I'm pretty sure Sehwag might have benefited from a poor umpiring decision during that innings. Most teams are sick of being at the receiving end of poor umpiring decisions when they play against India. So SL players thought he didn't deserve that hundred :agree:
Number Posted May 11, 2013 Posted May 11, 2013 I'm pretty sure Sehwag might have benefited from a poor umpiring decision during that innings. Most teams are sick of being at the receiving end of poor umpiring decisions when they play against India. So SL players thought he didn't deserve that hundred :agree: In that series there was some p!ss poor umpiring by no other than sharamsena. SL benefited hugely from that.
Executioner Posted May 11, 2013 Posted May 11, 2013 Srilanka will never be half as sporty as Bangladesh. We have done a lot for the sake of cricket We won against quality oppositions like lanka and WI, and now we are back to help Zimbabwe with some easy wins. We are the most sporty team in the world, take that haters :finger:
Magneto Posted May 11, 2013 Posted May 11, 2013 Srilanka will never be half as sporty as Bangladesh. We have done a lot for the sake of cricket We won against quality oppositions like lanka and WI, and now we are back to help Zimbabwe with some easy wins. We are the most sporty team in the world, take that haters :finger: True that. They've included a new form of stat writing - 'Excluding matches against Bangladesh' :hatsoff:
Square Drive Posted May 11, 2013 Posted May 11, 2013 Srilanka will never be half as sporty as Bangladesh. We have done a lot for the sake of cricket We won against quality oppositions like lanka and WI, and now we are back to help Zimbabwe with some easy wins. We are the most sporty team in the world, take that haters :finger:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now