fineleg Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 On a lighter note - If there was a cricket player - who can go into Cloud Computing technology - it is Jimmy Anderson. #2 bowler now after Steyn - well done.
Ultimate_Game Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 Anderson along with Steyn are the best fast bowlers in the world. I expect Pattinson to join them soon and if Umesh Yadav learns to control his line & length he will be a star as well.
Old guy Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 Anderson along with Steyn are the best fast bowlers in the world. I expect Pattinson to join them soon and if Umesh Yadav learns to control his line & length he will be a star as well. pattinson is good finn is better imo even though he is up and down but he is better than pattinson for now .. what about philly boy? :nervous:
SLICKR392 Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 Anderson's all class. His control over the ball is superb. He is more of a right handed Zaheer.
Old guy Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 Anderson's all class. His control over the ball is superb. He is more of a right handed Zaheer. anderson is much fitter and that to me is the difference :--D
SLICKR392 Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 anderson is much fitter and that to me is the difference :--D Yeah, I know. Believe me, Zak would have had much better stats if he wasn't made up of chop sticks.
Ultimate_Game Posted July 15, 2013 Posted July 15, 2013 Anderson's all class. His control over the ball is superb. He is more of a right handed Zaheer. Zak at his best was pretty good but unfortunately that didn't last too long. pattinson is good finn is better imo even though he is up and down but he is better than pattinson for now .. what about philly boy? :nervous: Finn is not better than Pattinson. Finn nearly cost England the Test with his loose bowling and struggled against the tail. Philander is pretty good but Pattinson has a greater upside IMO. Yeah' date=' I know. Believe me, Zak would have had much better stats if he wasn't made up of chop sticks.[/quote'] Zak has himself to blame. He doesn't have the right attitude and took his foot of the pedal after every decent performance. There are so many times we saw him with love handles and belly-tires after a break.
Old guy Posted July 15, 2013 Posted July 15, 2013 Yeah' date=' I know. Believe me, Zak would have had much better stats if he wasn't made up of chop sticks.[/quote'] nah its not the body its just the biyani :headshake:
Old guy Posted July 15, 2013 Posted July 15, 2013 Zak at his best was pretty good but unfortunately that didn't last too long. Finn is not better than Pattinson. Finn nearly cost England the Test with his loose bowling and struggled against the tail. Philander is pretty good but Pattinson has a greater upside IMO. Zak has himself to blame. He doesn't have the right attitude and took his foot of the pedal after every decent performance. There are so many times we saw him with love handles and belly-tires after a break. and what did pattinson do ? he floppedi n both innings imo just few good balls here and there even when he was getting reverse line was always wrong and length never threatning atleast finn did well with new ball ..he is jsut like that will bowls jaffas and flop after that pattinson to me is over rated ..i rate siddle much higher than him
Haarkarjeetgaye Posted July 15, 2013 Posted July 15, 2013 anderson is the best bowler in the world today. only shame is he is english
Ultimate_Game Posted July 15, 2013 Posted July 15, 2013 and what did pattinson do ? he floppedi n both innings imo just few good balls here and there even when he was getting reverse line was always wrong and length never threatning atleast finn did well with new ball ..he is jsut like that will bowls jaffas and flop after that pattinson to me is over rated ..i rate siddle much higher than him I don't know man but to me Pattinson bowls more wkt taking deliveries. Give him some time and he will be Australia's spearhead and one of the best bowlers going around. anderson is the best bowler in the world today. only shame is he is english Why? Steyn is pretty good as well and I would put both of them at the same level.
The Outsider Posted July 15, 2013 Posted July 15, 2013 Right up there with Steyn at the moment (not over their careers). Makes watching cricket a wonderful sight with his control.
Old guy Posted July 15, 2013 Posted July 15, 2013 I don't know man but to me Pattinson bowls more wkt taking deliveries. Give him some time and he will be Australia's spearhead and one of the best bowlers going around. Why? Steyn is pretty good as well and I would put both of them at the same level. i saw this match most of time i was frustrated by him to be very honest .. siddle looked much better and is much better right now
SLICKR392 Posted July 15, 2013 Posted July 15, 2013 anderson is the best bowler in the world today. only shame is he is english Steyn's always ahead of Anderson and he proved that in the tour to England.
Haarkarjeetgaye Posted July 15, 2013 Posted July 15, 2013 Steyn's always ahead of Anderson and he proved that in the tour to England. i think Anderson has more control and class. Steyn is more aggression. I like Andersons run up and style much better. Its smooth. have been watching it since 2003 WC
Ultimate_Game Posted July 15, 2013 Posted July 15, 2013 In swinging conditions Anderson is more lethal than Steyn but if the ball is not doing much and the pitch is flat, Steyn still can be relied upon to change things owing to pace. Anderson doesn't have that skill and that's why I would rate them at the same level.
Old guy Posted July 15, 2013 Posted July 15, 2013 i think Anderson has more control and class. Steyn is more aggression. I like Andersons run up and style much better. Its smooth. have been watching it since 2003 WC nah just bcos steyn is quicker does not means he has less contorl he out classed every english bowler last year only on tracks with no help anderson didn ot lookedl ike picking even one wicket against solid batting line up while steyn was winning watches like always
Old guy Posted July 15, 2013 Posted July 15, 2013 In swinging conditions Anderson is more lethal than Steyn but if the ball is not doing much and the pitch is flat' date= Steyn still can be relied upon to change things owing to pace. Anderson doesn't have that skill and that's why I would rate them at the same level. this is jsut not true . remind me when anderson takes 6-8 in one spell..
SLICKR392 Posted July 15, 2013 Posted July 15, 2013 In swinging conditions Anderson is more lethal than Steyn but if the ball is not doing much and the pitch is flat' date=' Steyn still can be relied upon to change things owing to pace. Anderson doesn't have that skill and that's why I would rate them at the same level.[/quote'] Steyn's got more swing and pace than Anderson and is equalliy or rather better than him in swinging conditions. The last time Steyn bowled on a pitch that had some swing, he nabbed a 6fer for 8 runs.
Old guy Posted July 15, 2013 Posted July 15, 2013 Steyn's got more swing and pace than Anderson and is equalliy or rather better than him in swinging conditions. The last time Steyn bowled on a pitch that had some swing, he nabbed a 6fer for 8 runs. exactly ..lets not make things up like steyn has less control or less lethal on green tracks just to glorify anderson..i love anderson's bowling have been his big fan and one of reasons im even supporting england in this series but steyn is just better and there is no shame to be number 2 after him .. steyn is a freak he can bowl at anderson's pace and bowl even more accurately then him and in next spell touch 152k and bowl bouncer after bouncer..
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now