Jump to content

Average Films That You Either Unconditionally Love or Hate


jalebi_bhai

Recommended Posts

Problem with SRK is, he doesn't have much versatility. . He can do the odd Swadesh or Chak De, but his body language in every movie is exactly the same unlike Amir's. When Shahrukh walks or talks or laughs in any movie, it's always Shahrukh doing those things. In Amir's case, it's the characters doing it so each laugh will be different. Look at the speech in Chak De and see his mannerism, he is still shaking and moving, exactly like his speech in Kabhi Khushi Kabhi Gum, his body language doesn't change, he is a limited actor. Of Course Salman is much more limited but he doesn't pretend to be a good actor
Shahrukh Khan is 10 times more versatile than Aamir Khan - proof is in the pudding. Aamir Khan refused Darr, before it was offered to Shahrukh, which made him a superstar from a star.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem with SRK is, he doesn't have much versatility. . He can do the odd Swadesh or Chak De, but his body language in every movie is exactly the same unlike Amir's. When Shahrukh walks or talks or laughs in any movie, it's always Shahrukh doing those things. In Amir's case, it's the characters doing it so each laugh will be different. Look at the speech in Chak De and see his mannerism, he is still shaking and moving, exactly like his speech in Kabhi Khushi Kabhi Gum, his body language doesn't change, he is a limited actor. Of Course Salman is much more limited but he doesn't pretend to be a good actor
I think he is quite versatile tbf........it's just that his bakri-waale 'Kkkkkk.....Kiran' turrets keep acting up whenever he acts.......irrespective of his role......and when it is apparent.......you chuckle in your mind and call him a chew-tiya.....:giggle:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shahrukh Khan is 10 times more versatile than Aamir Khan - proof is in the pudding. Aamir Khan refused Darr' date=' before it was offered to Shahrukh, which made him a superstar from a star.[/quote'] didn't refused Aamir had problem with climax of the film Both parties agreed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shahrukh Khan is 10 times more versatile than Aamir Khan - proof is in the pudding. Aamir Khan refused Darr' date=' before it was offered to Shahrukh, which made him a superstar from a star.[/quote'] :hysterical:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rangeela performance Can anyone play a better tapoori than Aamir, the answer is NO We saw how miserably SRK failed in Josh he sucked :haha:
I can name 10 tapori appearances off the top of my head better than Aamir Khan's in Rangeela starting from Dev Anand in Bambai Ka Babu.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SRK is definitely NOT versatile in the last decade or so - barring the odd Swades' date=' Chak De most of it is the same old wine in a new bottle.[/quote'] I am NOT claiming Shahrukh Khan to be more versatile over the last decade - over the last decade all I can remember it BS like Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna and that last Yash Raj movie of whom I can't even remember the name. I am talking about their careers.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

amir khan is a very good actor' date='he is pretty natural in acting..i will no way accept srk is better than AK..though both actors are physically and look wise below par for a hero[/quote'] So why did Aamir Khan refuse Darr, if he according to you he could have pulled it off? Just because he was supposed to get a few kicks in the climax?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyways' date=' as actors both are mediocre, with Shahrukh slightly better than Aamir. If we really want to talk about actors the conversation should be more about Naseeruddin Shah and Om Puri.[/quote'] Yup Both are just okay, but I like Aamir films more than SRK My opinion on best actor is Nawazuddin Siddique I know he is new, but he is a DAMN GOOD ACTOR Gang of Wassepur-Fasial-:hatsoff:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...