vishalvirsingh Posted September 22, 2013 Posted September 22, 2013 Ysterday no 1 bowler ws Johnson his fastest ws 152K Our Shukla bowled well n hope he is picked for next Match too.....he bowled from 124k to 139K
saneindian Posted September 22, 2013 Posted September 22, 2013 Vikramjit Malik - MoM for his brilliant spell, speed between 125-130 kph.
rkt.india Posted September 22, 2013 Posted September 22, 2013 Vikramjit Malik - MoM for his brilliant spell' date=' speed between 125-130 kph.[/quote'] More like 120-125. He is a master at using such conditions. Look at his domestic FC record.
rkt.india Posted September 22, 2013 Posted September 22, 2013 Ysterday no 1 bowler ws Johnson his fastest ws 152K Our Shukla bowled well n hope he is picked for next Match too.....he bowled from 124k to 139K Dont think those were 124K at all. Speed guns were inconsistent at the start till first 10 overs. Even Watson and Faulkner were clocked to have inconsistent speeds around 125Ks.
saneindian Posted September 22, 2013 Posted September 22, 2013 Dont think those were 124K at all. Speed guns were inconsistent at the start till first 10 overs. Even Watson and Faulkner were clocked to have inconsistent speeds around 125Ks. You mean Vikramjit Malik was bowling 135? Or was the speed gun malfucntioning for everyone but him and Binny (both clocking around 125)?
MCcricket Posted September 22, 2013 Posted September 22, 2013 I hope Shukla, Suyal, can make a statement and get into the picture as far as selectors for the A side, presently most A team bowlers are pathetic, personally if Indian side has Umesh, Suyal, Shukla, Ishant, Varun, as attacking options and Shami, Pandey, BK, Kaul as seam bowlers along with Pankaj Singh we will have a good pool of bowlers, Unadkat, VK, Dinda and most A team bowlers are pathetic trundlers.
rkt.india Posted September 22, 2013 Posted September 22, 2013 You mean Vikramjit Malik was bowling 135? Or was the speed gun malfucntioning for everyone but him and Binny (both clocking around 125)? Malik was barely clocking even 125K, so many balls around 120K from him, even 119K at the start, quickest was I think 128k from him and I meant they were inconsistent at the start. One ball was showed at 125 then another 138 and then another 127 and all looked similar pace wise, did not say those were showing lower speeds, but were inconsistent.
vishalvirsingh Posted September 23, 2013 Author Posted September 23, 2013 Had Shukla bowled 4 he wud have fared better than MAlik
Recommended Posts