Which pacers should be in the Indian team playing XI for SA?

[Gunner]

It'd be a blunder to leave out a Strike bowler like Yadav based on 1 Ranji game. In his last match which was televised, he bowled pretty well on an absolute road of a pitch, no way can you judge a bowler based on scorecard alone.

[MCcricket]

If going by some critics and their understanding Johnson should not have been in the team but Mckay should lol, if a player is out of team for reasons like injury then he needs to prove he can bowl enough overs and is in rhythm, he doesn't have to prove himself by getting bucket loads of wickets as to how he is bowling, any capt with common sense would have, Zak, Shami, Umesh in their team for test and also have him for ODI ALONG WITH BHUVI.

[Sidhoni]

In the telecasted Ranji match' date=' Umesh did not look out of form. He was getting seam movement as well as reverse swing at good pace. His control was actually better than what we have seen so far. Took 3 wickets. The only problem was, sometimes his run-up looked non rhythmic. Sometimes not always.[b'] I guess this issue will be judged by Dhoni and co. in the nets before the tests.

Or maybe the 2-dayer may serve as a shootout between BK-Yadav if we get to bowl substantial no. of overs.

[express bowling]

Or maybe the 2-dayer may serve as a shootout between BK-Yadav if we get to bowl substantial no. of overs.

I was not aware of this game. Fair enough.

[Muloghonto]

yadav,shami,bhuvi should be the attack in odis yadav,zak,bhuvi/shami in tests

This.

[FischerTal]

yadav,shami,bhuvi should be the attack in odis yadav,zak,bhuvi/shami in tests

its good lineup as of now, but it will be interesting once aaron makes comeback. he surely can do good in ODIs and he has shown in this Ranji season that he's a good test candidate.

[Sidhoni]

Acc to ICFers it should've been Shami Bhuvi Yadav It turns out Shami Zak Pisshant :wall: