Jump to content

Selectors take notice, countdown this could be the golden age of Indian FAST BOWLERS


MCcricket

Selectors take notice, countdown this could be the golden age of Indian FAST BOWLERS  

  1. 1.



Recommended Posts

Posted

India had not ever had the luxury of having more then one world class bowler at one time and mostly not even that, with the emergence of Shami the selectors need to work on planning and creating a pool of talented pacers who can compete for a spot in the team and give options due to injury to bowlers. Aaron has made a promising comeback, Umesh is waiting in the wings, Suyal looks like a very good option for a left armer with pace and has skills, Shukla is raw but has pace and more so bounce of the wicket, Pankaj has been waiting forever, ISHWAR Pandey IS ALSO ONE WHO IS VERY PROMISING NOT EXPRESS BUT QUICK ENOUGH AND CAN BE A TEST BOWLER,BK is a decent line and length bowler with skills, Zak seems rejuvenated and might have couple of years left in him and can groom the bowlers especially the left armer Suyal. Umesh, Suyal, Aaron, Shukla, Shami can be impact bowlers and they can bowl above 140 k with ease and average close to 140's in a spell, also have skills and can move the ball, Unlike the batters talented pacers should not be made to wait for 5 to 6 seasons to mature as most loose pace and potency on our sub continent tracks, Shami showed us what potential and talent can do , selectors will be wise to look at this pool and beyond as bowlers who have promise and stop waisting their time on pretetenders who have no chance to make an impact, VK, Narwal, Mithun, Unadkat, Aravind, ISHANT IN HIS PRESENT FORM. ANWAR AHMED, Kamran KHAN, Aniket Choudhary, Kaul, Warrier are other bowlers that selectors need to monitor and groom because of their traits, they should be picked up for A tours and not rejects like VK, Narwal, Mithun, Unadkat.

Posted
India had not ever had the luxury of having more then one world class bowler at one time and mostly not even that, with the emergence of Shami the selectors need to work on planning and creating a pool of talented pacers who can compete for a spot in the team and give options due to injury to bowlers. Aaron has made a promising comeback, Umesh is waiting in the wings, Suyal looks like a very good option for a left armer with pace and has skills, Shukla is raw but has pace and more so bounce of the wicket, Pankaj has been waiting forever, ISHWAR Pandey IS ALSO ONE WHO IS VERY PROMISING NOT EXPRESS BUT QUICK ENOUGH AND CAN BE A TEST BOWLER,BK is a decent line and length bowler with skills, Zak seems rejuvenated and might have couple of years left in him and can groom the bowlers especially the left armer Suyal. Umesh, Suyal, Aaron, Shukla, Shami can be impact bowlers and they can bowl above 140 k with ease and average close to 140's in a spell, also have skills and can move the ball, Unlike the batters talented pacers should not be made to wait for 5 to 6 seasons to mature as most loose pace and potency on our sub continent tracks, Shami showed us what potential and talent can do , selectors will be wise to look at this pool and beyond as bowlers who have promise and stop waisting their time on pretetenders who have no chance to make an impact, VK, Narwal, Mithun, Unadkat, Aravind, ISHANT IN HIS PRESENT FORM. ANWAR AHMED, Kamran KHAN, Aniket Choudhary, Kaul, are other bowlers that selectors need to monitor and groom because of their traits, they should be picked up for A tours and not rejects like VK, Narwal, Mithun, Unadkat.
Is he still playing lol...I thought his action was reported and he was never the same after that from what I heard
Posted
Is he still playing lol...I thought his action was reported and he was never the same after that from what I heard
Kamran played for SL domestic last year and did ok, seems like he has worked hard on his fitness and action and has gained pace and is bowling for HYD A in CK Nayadu tournament and doing well, hopefully he gets a chance for HYD as their bowling suck at present and he seems to be bowling well per reports.
Posted
Our selectors have picked unadkat and Vinny kooomar.. I think they are just too lazy to do some analysis and pick the right bowlers...
It is a surprise with Patil and Pathetic Srikant who have both played Int cricket they , coaches, Dhoni are blind to the Obvious, Unadkat, Vk, Mithun dont have what it takes , it is nepotism and failure to work as effective team, Saurav, Tendulkar should be somehow involved for recognizing and pushing for talent, More, and some earlier selectors were better then Cheeka who was worst and Patio fails as a good visioNary as Far as bowling goes
Posted

Could be very exciting. But am sure selectors and dhoni will screw it up and stick with Ishants/Kumar and unadkunts. I feel unadkunt is the next loser who will be given a ridiculously long rope over next few years and picked again and again while we all pull our hair out.

Posted
Could be very exciting. But am sure selectors and dhoni will screw it up and stick with Ishants/Kumar and unadkunts. I feel unadkunt is the next loser who will be given a ridiculously long rope over next few years and picked again and again while we all pull our hair out.
Yes u r right , lol, I thought things would change with Fletcher but under Sreekant n now Patio we are becoming trundlerstan not for want of choice but selectors inability to see the obvious
Posted

From 2004-08 with the emergence of Irfan, Balaji, RP, Sreesanth, Munaf, VRV, Ishant, PK and with Zaheer on an upswing we had an equally good crop of pacers or perhaps even better than the current lot. Slowly all of them faded away due to injuries, loss of focus or lack of hardwork. Hopefully the current group doesn't go the same way.

Posted
From 2004-08 with the emergence of Irfan, Balaji, RP, Sreesanth, Munaf, VRV, Ishant, PK and with Zaheer on an upswing we had an equally good crop of pacers or perhaps even better than the current lot. Slowly all of them faded away due to injuries, loss of focus or lack of hardwork. Hopefully the current group doesn't go the same way.
I think Shami, Suyal, Aaron, Umesh, Pandey are better then any previous gen and never have we seen such influx of serious pace, Umesh, Aaron, Suyal, Shukla are fast, Shami is pacy and very skillfully, Pandey looks a good talent, Pankaj is ready for test cricket and not picked up.
Posted

I fail to understand the basis of selection for most pacers. You get rare gems like Shami and Umesh. But so many duds. Pacers' selection is used for pleasing the Sports Management Companies and influential people. Our captain is not very supportive or discerning about good pacers. So, I am not very optimistic about how many good pacers we will actually develop. BUT, it is true that we have some good talent coming through. Shami, Umesh, Aaron, Suyal, Pandey, BK, Dhawal, Mohit, Kaul all are good prospects. So many good guys but how many will get the chance to actually play in the 11 for some time.

Posted
I think Shami' date=' Suyal, Aaron, Umesh, Pandey are better then any previous gen and never have we seen such influx of serious pace, Umesh, Aaron, Suyal, Shukla are fast, Shami is pacy and very skillfully, Pandey looks a good talent, Pankaj is ready for test cricket and not picked up.[/quote'] You are right. For the first time in our history, we have 5 genuine fast bowlers -- Umesh, Aaron, Shami, Suyal and Shukla -- available for selection. Out of these 4 are wicket taking bowlers. What can be better than wicket taking genuine quicks !
Posted
I think Shami' date=' Suyal, Aaron, Umesh, Pandey are better then any previous gen and never have we seen such influx of serious pace, Umesh, Aaron, Suyal, Shukla are fast, Shami is pacy and very skillfully, Pandey looks a good talent, Pankaj is ready for test cricket and not picked up.[/quote'] Are you sure? Irfan was taking wickets for fun in his first couple of years, Bala was bowling 83-84 mph and bowled us to test wins on flat pattas in Pak, Sreesanth, Munaf, RP were all bowling 140+ in 2006-07 with Sree winning us a test in SA and RP in England with some of the best spells ever by Indian pacers.
Posted
Are you sure? Irfan was taking wickets for fun in his first couple of years, Bala was bowling 83-84 mph and bowled us to test wins on flat pattas in Pak, Sreesanth, Munaf, RP were all bowling 140+ in 2006-07 with Sree winning us a test in SA and RP in England with some of the best spells ever by Indian pacers.
u are right..during that 06-08 period we had a genuinely good pace attack which thwarted the english,aussies,saffer from scoring at their own den,they were close to world class just then IPL occurred :facepalm: ..those guys became unfit,lacked work ethics ,now i hope the management and the young bowlers have realised what they need to do after watching their predecessor`s demise
Posted
You are right. For the first time in our history' date=' we have 5 genuine fast bowlers -- Umesh, Aaron, Shami, Suyal and Shukla -- available for selection. Out of these 4 are wicket taking bowlers. What can be better than wicket taking genuine quicks ![/quote'] Genuine Wicket taking bowlers will never have average or poor FC records. Umesh - 33 matches , 115 wickets @27, SR 48 Shami - 20 matches, 82 wickets @25, SR 48 Suyal - 13 matches, 51 wickets @32, SR @43 Aaron - 15 matches, 37 wickeys @37, SR 67 Shukla - 13 matches, 27 wickets @42, SR 70 No one has yet seen Suyal and Shukla bowl in a FC match to comment on how well they bowl in their 2nd and 3rd spells. They need more time to be ready for international cricket, a spell or two in IPL shouldn't be the gateway to National Side. Both have suffered repeated injuries and should play an entire FC season. Aaron too needs more FC cricket after his comeback. The best of the lot- Umesh and Shami are already in the national squad and if they remain injury free will continue to be there for next 5-6 years. Ishwar Pandey and Kaul are in India A with Pandey close to an India spot now.
Posted

This lot is more faster and talented, Balaji, Irfan, Sreesanth, RP were 130 to 135 bowlers and when bowling well touched 140 s, this lot has an ave pace of 140, Shami, Aaron, Umesh, Suyal, Shukla can easily average 140, Pankaj, Pandey are 135 to 144 bracket and average 135 to 138 respectively, also this lot is more talented skillfull and fit as far as bowling fitness.

Posted
Genuine Wicket taking bowlers will never have average or poor FC records. Umesh - 33 matches , 115 wickets @27, SR 48 Shami - 20 matches, 82 wickets @25, SR 48 Suyal - 13 matches, 51 wickets @32, SR @43 Aaron - 15 matches, 37 wickeys @37, SR 67 Shukla - 13 matches, 27 wickets @42, SR 70 No one has yet seen Suyal and Shukla bowl in a FC match to comment on how well they bowl in their 2nd and 3rd spells. They need more time to be ready for international cricket, a spell or two in IPL shouldn't be they gateway to National Side. Both have suffered repeated injuries and should play an entire FC season. Aaron too needs more FC cricket after his comeback. The best of the lot- Umesh and Shami are already in the national squad and if they remain injury free will continue to be there for next 5-6 years. Ishwar Pandey and Kaul are in India A with Pandey close to an India spot now.
Suyal has a FC average of 26 -- not 32 as you have wrongly stated. Coupled with SR of 43 that is really wicket taking. Aaron has 29 wickets from 15 list A games. Avg. 19, SR 23. That too is really wicket taking in 50 overs format. Umesh has a SR of 46 in tests so far. That is really wicket taking. His FC av.*of 27 at SR 48, proves that only. Shami again has av. of 16 , SR 26 in his short test career. FC avg. 25 at SR 48 and list A avg. of 26. This guy is really wicket taking. Shukla is not wicket taking. As I said, 4 out of 5 are wicket taking so far.
Posted
Suyal has a FC average of 26 -- not 32 as you have wrongly stated. Coupled with SR of 43 that is really wicket taking. Aaron has 29 wickets from 15 list A games. Avg. 19, SR 23. That too is really wicket taking in 50 overs format. Umesh has a SR of 46 in tests so far. That is really wicket taking. His FC av.*of 27 at SR 48, proves that only. Shami again has av. of 16 , SR 26 in his short test career. FC avg. 25 at SR 48 and list A avg. of 26. This guy is really wicket taking. Shukla is not wicket taking. As I said, 4 out of 5 are wicket taking so far.
Just on pure stats alone Pankaj, Suyal, Pandey should be in the picture to play for India, Aaron, Umesh, Shami have already played for India and we all know that they are good bowlers and not discussing them, Shukla has everything going for him and not yet ready a season or two after his comeback and he will be ready.
Posted
This lot is more faster and talented' date=' Balaji, Irfan, Sreesanth, RP were 130 to 135 bowlers and when bowling well touched 140 s, this lot has an ave pace of 140, Shami, Aaron, Umesh, Suyal, Shukla can easily average 140, Pankaj, Pandey are 135 to [b']1444 bracket and average v35 to 138 respectively, also this lot is more talented skillfull and fit as far as bowling fitness.
We MUST TAKE these two pacers. Atul Sharma crying. :dance:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...