Jump to content

Zaheer Khan v Mitchell Johnson


Recommended Posts

Posted

Both left hand pacers Zak is much more accurate Zak has better seam position and release Zak gets more seam movement Zak get more swing Zak can move it both ways at will, Johnson can only really move it one way Zak is better exponent of reverse swing, master of it. Zak is cleverer bowler then Johnson Zak has more repeatable action But But Johnson is much more effective and better bowler. Why is that? Johnson has only one attribute which he has better then Zak. This question is for trundler fans. What is that one attribute which makes Johnson miles better?

Posted
Both left hand pacers Zak is much more accurate Zak has better seam position and release Zak gets more seam movement Zak get more swing Zak can move it both ways at will, Johnson can only really move it one way Zak is better exponent of reverse swing, master of it. Zak is cleverer bowler then Johnson Zak has more repeatable action But But Johnson is much more effective and better bowler. Why is that? Johnson has only one attribute which he has better then Zak. This question is for trundler fans. What is that one attribute which makes Johnson miles better?
THE NEXT MITCHELL JOHNSON AD YOUR FAVOURITE BOWLER NONE OTHER THAN 8v15.jpg
Posted
Both left hand pacers Zak is much more accurate Zak has better seam position and release Zak gets more seam movement Zak get more swing Zak can move it both ways at will, Johnson can only really move it one way Zak is better exponent of reverse swing, master of it. Zak is cleverer bowler then Johnson Zak has more repeatable action But But Johnson is much more effective and better bowler. Why is that? Johnson has only one attribute which he has better then Zak. This question is for trundler fans. What is that one attribute which makes Johnson miles better?
Johnson has Moustaches but Zaheer doesn't :((
Posted
Both left hand pacers Zak is much more accurate Zak has better seam position and release Zak gets more seam movement Zak get more swing Zak can move it both ways at will, Johnson can only really move it one way Zak is better exponent of reverse swing, master of it. Zak is cleverer bowler then Johnson Zak has more repeatable action But But Johnson is much more effective and better bowler. Why is that? Johnson has only one attribute which he has better then Zak. This question is for trundler fans. What is that one attribute which makes Johnson miles better?
When you are facing someone as quick as Mitchell, your instinct occasionally makes you do things you shouldn't.. PACE causes indecision! - KP
Posted
Both left hand pacers Zak is much more accurate Zak has better seam position and release Zak gets more seam movement Zak get more swing Zak can move it both ways at will, Johnson can only really move it one way Zak is better exponent of reverse swing, master of it. Zak is cleverer bowler then Johnson Zak has more repeatable action But But Johnson is much more effective and better bowler. Why is that? Johnson has only one attribute which he has better then Zak. This question is for trundler fans. What is that one attribute which makes Johnson miles better?
Unadkat will ease all your pain he will be a fearsome strike bowler :two_thumbs_up:
Posted

Its not a fair comparision, particularly right now. Age catching up with Zak right now. Of course even at his best he was not as destructive because he did not have the pace, but honestly how many pacemen - in the history of cricket even-have had the kind of purple patch MJ is in right now ... its not just the pace though, its that combined with that low round arm slingy action which makes the bounce so hard to gauge..MJ was born with that and the body of a decathelete... I dare say if MJ had a traditional high arm action like Zak he would not be quite so effective.

Posted

The real difference is the pace. MJ keeps the batsman on the back foot and the batsmen generally plays him on the crease, which makes his fuller balls that much more effective. Add to that MJ's accuracy with that short ball, he bangs it into the batsman's ribs and armpits. Zak bowled with skill and hence is a successful bowler even at that pace. However Johnson is on song with sheer pace and accuracy. Even Johnson gives away a few boundary balls, but with Zak, batsmen capitalizes as he doesn't have the pace to trouble them while Johnson hurries on and the batsmen don't get the time to play him the way they want. Its a little too do with the psychologically of the players too.

Posted
Samad Falla can be our answer to johnson if he goes to gym
:wall: We must stop hyping players, by now we should have known that even the ones who once bowled 150 can be brought to 120s and 130s soon :((

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...