Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Lot of rules have be rewritten to protect the safety of players in cricket. But for such restriction it would have been a far more intimidating and dangerous game. Despite guys being in plain white clothes it is a nasty game where you can get killed. Sure they may not run 100 meter in 9.83 seconds. West INdies cricketers can easily outrun anybody in MLB.. Even a part time cricketer can outrun them.. for example this guy :cantstop: [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WHCeXdYxZc]Blake's six damage car at cricket match - YouTube[/ame]

Posted
Lot of rules have be rewritten to protect the safety of players in cricket. But for such restriction it would have been a far more intimidating and dangerous game. Despite guys being in plain white clothes it is a nasty game where you can get killed. Sure they may not run 100 meter in 9.83 seconds. West INdies cricketers can easily outrun anybody in MLB.. Even a part time cricketer can outrun them.. for example this guy :cantstop:
I can ask the same question why batsman wear pads but it is all for player safety.
Posted
I can ask the same question why batsman wear pads but it is all for player safety.
Because gets to you under a second? With catching you get plenty of time to catch. Also in cricket within rules you can kill a batsman. In baseball you have to break the law. There is no concept of yorkers in baseball. There is no concept of bouncers.. Then pitch contributes a lot. Sometimes ball won't climb , sometimes it will. Those external factors are not coming into play in baseball. There is so much unpredictability in cricket.
Posted
I have given you first base nos.
Still there is no such stat in cricket. Frankly it would be a laughable state for anyone who knows about cricket. Guys like Dhoni, Raina, Kohli are as fast as anyone out there.
Posted
I can ask the same question why batsman wear pads but it is all for player safety.
Btw.. if the ball is so dangerous why are they not wearing pads but wearing gloves?
Posted
Btw.. if the ball is so dangerous why are they not wearing pads but wearing gloves?
There reflexes are good so they can avoid the balls hitting their bodies, gloves in hand means they have to catch everything.
Posted
Still there is no such stat in cricket. Frankly it would be a laughable state for anyone who knows about cricket. Guys like Dhoni' date=' Raina, Kohli are as fast as anyone out there.[/quote'] These guys are good but not that blazing fast nos I have stated.
Posted
Because gets to you under a second? With catching you get plenty of time to catch. Also in cricket within rules you can kill a batsman. In baseball you have to break the law. There is no concept of yorkers in baseball. There is no concept of bouncers.. Then pitch contributes a lot. Sometimes ball won't climb ' date=' sometimes it will. Those external factors are not coming into play in baseball. There is so much unpredictability in cricket.[/quote'] Pitch contributes but takes 40% of the pace off. The ball is coming so slow.
Posted
There reflexes are good so they can avoid the balls hitting their bodies' date=' gloves in hand means they have to catch everything.[/quote'] Let them do that in cricket without pads and helmet . Then you can talk. IN cricket hitting a batsman is legal. In baseball it is illegal. Let them make it legal. Let them survive a bouncer from Vinay kumar first before surviving against Johnson.
Posted
Let them do that in cricket without pads and helmet . Then you can talk. IN cricket hitting a batsman is legal. In baseball it is illegal. Let them make it legal. Let them survive a bouncer from Vinay kumar first before surviving against Johnson.
In cricket it is a no ball.
Posted
Person A hits a ball 150 m with a surface area less than 2 sq in Person B hits a ball 100 m with a surface area of 160 sq in. Who has the better reflex?
what is this trash? so bad :haha:
Posted
In cricket it is a no ball.
Dont be disingeneous. *some* baseball pitches can be ruled a no-ball. Not all pitches would be a no-ball in cricket's context. Take a look at this picture: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Strike_zone_en.JPG As you can see, the majority of the strike zone in MLB is below a batter's hip, so its not a no-ball, since full tosses are no-balls only if they are above hip height. Cricket is definitely more brutal in baseball, in cricket you are allowed to target a batsman's head, period. Whether the ball bounces or not is irrelevant, it is an assault to the head. In baseball, by default that is illegal.
Posted
Pitch contributes but takes 40% of the pace off. The ball is coming so slow.
Err no, the pitch does not take 40% of the pace off. You are simply pulling numbers out of your buttocks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...