Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Great news. Icing on the cake is that haters will be burning. There was so much negativity on msm and sm as if some of these scumbags would be happier if something happned to these nurses.

Posted
Great news. Icing on the cake is that haters will be burning. There was so much negativity on msm and sm as if some of these scumbags would be happier if something happned to these nurses.
and this post makes it amply clear that you're not a hater. :haha:
Posted
Great news. Icing on the cake is that haters will be burning. There was so much negativity on msm and sm as if some of these scumbags would be happier if something happned to these nurses.
Disappointment for them... :cantstop:
Posted
Ok ravish, now I'm confused. You initially used the term 'we' so I thought you were speaking in the Indian context. But now you're talking about people in the Middle East and Europe. I am not in any position to comment how prevalent these views are in the Middle East. But logic dictates that the monarchies of the Gulf region wouldn't want a Caliphate. They would want to stay in control and practically dole out $$$/oil wells to citizens to keep things from simmering. Also the last Caliphate was an Ottoman creation, which the Arabs weren't too happy about. "Leadership of Islam" with a non Arab is something that was not acceptable to them. We could judge better if this call resonates and people join in support of the ISIS. All I see in the news is that its created a counter effect: Iran, the US and the regular residents of Baghdad who have been united in the face of this monster.
My feeling is you were expecting a different explanation. Hence you are confused. Yes 'we' is like royal 'we'. It need not include everyone.
×
×
  • Create New...