Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Deserved a more stringent ban, may be for 2 years at least. The incident was shocking and needs to be condemned all over the globe. Uruguay defending their star player is disgusting. The incident cannot be supported. Its pathetic to see people claiming biting to be alright in football. FIFA should have been a lot more aggressive on this issue. But I think because the world cup is in South America, Suarez might have gotten away.

Posted
Well can't blame Uruguay supporting their sporting icon tbh....every country does that
Sachin Tendulkar is a bigger sporting icon. He ges cop duly when he is at the wrong end. These guys will even justify Suarez killing someone with a knife lol
Posted
But how is it any different from potentially career ending tackles which are regularly made ?
Tackling while the ball is still on is different from intentionally biting someone. Like in cricket, a bowler can ball bouncers and beamers directed as someone intentionally. But it is very different from a bowler kicking a batsman even though the kick will cause lesser injury. Same thing here
Posted
Innocent bite? Did you see the mark on Chiellini? He was feasting on Ivanovics's arm' date= not long back. Deserved nothing less than a life ban.
lol.. you are making it sound as if he had his dinner right in the ground during match. You get a mark even when a doctor pinches an injection in you. So what big deal if Chellini had a mark. Most of the persons would any day such marks ahead of a tackle happening when you running at full speed. Such tackle can make you bed-ridden for months.
Posted
lol.. you are making it sound as if he had his dinner right in the ground during match. You get a mark even when a doctor pinches an injection in you. So what big deal if Chellini had a mark. Most of the persons would any day such marks ahead of a tackle happening when you running at full speed. Such tackle can make you bed-ridden for months.
lol....you are making it sound as if there is no difference between a tackle in a football game (which is a natural part of the aggressive game) and one person biting another (that too its his 3rd incident of biting an opponent).
Posted
lol....you are making it sound as if there is no difference between a tackle in a football game (which is a natural part of the aggressive game) and one person biting another (that too its his 3rd incident of biting an opponent).
well.. when aggressive, some people may love to tackle while some may love to bite. :D
Posted
lol.. you are making it sound as if he had his dinner right in the ground during match. You get a mark even when a doctor pinches an injection in you. So what big deal if Chellini had a mark. Most of the persons would any day such marks ahead of a tackle happening when you running at full speed. Such tackle can make you bed-ridden for months.
He was basically eating Ivanovic. Lol! And as said above my MTC and yoda, this is inhuman. Beamers and short balls can end careers too, but imagine the bowler running towards the batsman and taking a bite out of him? This guy is mentally unstable.
Posted

4 month Ban is harsh on Liverpool. They should have banned him from World Cup and ordered Liverpool to get him help from a psychiatrist.

Posted

Looks like the sponsors are now deserting him. 888poker had just signed him weeks ago and now are dropping him. Addidas too said they wont use him further (he is one of the brand ambassadors.)

Posted

Much rather have suarez nibble my shoulder then a carrer threatning two footer at my knees or an elbow flush in the face which could break my nose. Point is that other players have committed much more dangerous things and have done so more then 3 times and in much shorter time frames. What Suarez did was more weird and odd in an attempt to hurt someone. However, it seems he has got a lengthy ban cos what he did was unsual and weird in trying to hurt someone, rather then what the ban should have been based on was how much you could hurt the other guy. Others do much more serious hurtful things but these are seen as weird and normal ways of trying to hurt your opponent and would only get a straight red and no mass hysteria and extra ban above the norm.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...