Speeds and Performances of Pacers and Spinners

[express bowling]

9 minutes ago, RAZPOR said:

Its not to tough to look,unless you dont wanna look.

 

 

 

Would be interesting to see what speeds he clocks outside Pakistan.

 

I will bank on that more.

 

 

Edited February 7, 2021 by express bowling

[RAZPOR]

10 minutes ago, Indwin said:

Lol speed guns are showing speeds of 2 to 4 balls per over .Besides  in previous over he bowled multiple balls over 145.  If you remember wc2015 wahab riaz bowled a 154.xx  out of no where.

 

multiple deliveries over 145 

or exactly 2 deliveries at exactly 145.

thats a nice way to mangle words isnt it?

 

 

I wasnt gonna do this but i really dont like when people misrepresent facts.

shaheen is a good bowler and we all appreciate him here for what he is but dont present him to be something he is not.

Because we are not kids here in this thread.

 

 

[Indwin]

Just now, express bowling said:

 

 

 

Would be interesting to see what speeds he clocks outside Pakistan.

Well some during his bowling  in Nz i came across a  tweet by cricviz which indicated that his pace had increased

[Indwin]

3 minutes ago, RAZPOR said:

multiple deliveries over 145 

or exactly 2 deliveries at exactly 145.

thats a nice way to mangle words isnt it?

 

 

I wasnt gonna do this but i really dont like when people misrepresent facts.

shaheen is a good bowler and we all appreciate him here for what he is but dont present him to be something he is not.

Because we are not kids here in this thread.

 

 

Isn't 2 multiple?

[express bowling]

5 minutes ago, RAZPOR said:

multiple deliveries over 145 

or exactly 2 deliveries at exactly 145.

thats a nice way to mangle words isnt it?

 

 

I wasnt gonna do this but i really dont like when people misrepresent facts.

shaheen is a good bowler and we all appreciate him here for what he is but dont present him to be something he is not.

Because we are not kids here in this thread.

 

 

 

 

Which site is this bro ?

 

The ICC website is not showing speeds for this match now.

[express bowling]

3 minutes ago, Indwin said:

Well some during his bowling  in Nz i came across a  tweet by cricviz which indicated that his pace had increased

 

 

It has increased.

 

But more like 134 k to 146 k range.

 

Not 150 k +.

[RAZPOR]

1 minute ago, Indwin said:

Isn't 2 multiple?

are you a lawyer?

cause you wont make a great one.

fortunately for you this isnt court.

 

[RAZPOR]

3 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

 

Which site is this bro ?

 

The ICC website is not showing speeds for this match now.

cricbuzz

[Indwin]

4 minutes ago, RAZPOR said:

multiple deliveries over 145 

or exactly 2 deliveries at exactly 145.

thats a nice way to mangle words isnt it?

 

 

I wasnt gonna do this but i really dont like when people misrepresent facts.

shaheen is a good bowler and we all appreciate him here for what he is but dont present him to be something he is not.

Because we are not kids here in this thread.

 

 

Lol  on streaming  speedguns are showing speed of 2 to 4 balls if you can refute this please do.Actually you are  actually acting like kids.Now you will say  Cummins did not bowl a single delivery over 146kph in first three tests then how come he bowled 150kph .

[Indwin]

5 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

 

It has increased.

 

But more like 134 k to 146 k range.

 

Not 150 k +.

How do you  know it was between this range?

[express bowling]

1 minute ago, Indwin said:

How do you  know it was between this range?

 

 

This is the range he has bowled at in this series.

[RAZPOR]

Just now, Indwin said:

Lol  on streaming  speedguns are showing speed of 2 to 4 balls if you can refute this please do.Actually you are  actually acting like kids.Now you will say  Cummins did not bowl a single delivery over 146kph in first three tests then how come he bowled 150kph .

I wont cause it wont be true.

He has bowled 'multiple' 150+ deliveries in a single over.

I would agree for the same when shaheen does that too and i am sure he will do that someday.

But that day isnt today.

My problem is with people misrepresenting facts.

[Indwin]

Just now, express bowling said:

 

 

This is the range he has bowled at in this series.

his fastest  before that was 146.6

[express bowling]

6 minutes ago, Indwin said:

Cummins did not bowl a single delivery over 146kph in first three tests then how come he bowled 150kph .

 

 

It is true that Cummins' quickest ball in the first 3 tests was 145.x kph.

 

But in the 4th test, his fastest was 150 k ... And he bowled 2 more balls at 147.x kph in that spell. So, the difference between the fastest and second fastest balls was a little more than 2 kph. (  Very small difference )

 

This usually shows that the speeds are correct and he was actually bowling quicker that day.

[Suhaan]

Paxtani speedguns when Pakistani titans bowling shouldn't be trusted at all

[Indwin]

20 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

 

It is true that Cummins' quickest ball in the first 3 tests was 145.x kph.

 

But in the 4th test, his fastest was 150 k ... And he bowled 2 more balls at 147.x kph in that spell. So, the difference between the fastest and second fastest balls was a little more than 2 kph. (  Very small difference )

 

This usually shows that the speeds are correct and he was actually bowling quicker that day.

Best case study isbumrah's 149 kph in that innings before that particular ball his fastest ball of innings was 142.xx . and second fastest ball of the spell in which he bowled 149kph was 141.6kph.  In later spells bumrah bowled  multiple balls over 145kph. Shaheen has only bowled one spell in this innings

[Indwin]

34 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

 

This is the range he has bowled at in this series.

Nope he has bowled up to 149kph before that

[Indwin]

43 minutes ago, RAZPOR said:

are you a lawyer?

cause you wont make a great one.

fortunately for you this isnt court.

 

For your kind information 2 is multiple of 1.Seems like you are quite poor at maths 

[RAZPOR]

3 minutes ago, Indwin said:

For your kind information 2 is multiple of 1.Seems like you are quite poor at maths 

were you using the 'noun'  to teach me multiples??

if not then read (b)

 

and this took you an hour to come up with.

I take my words back ,you cant possibly be lit enough to misrepresent anything..Take my apologies.

[Indwin]

B

1 minute ago, RAZPOR said:

were you using the 'noun'  to teach me multiples??

if not then read (b)

 

and this took you an hour to come up with.

I take my words back ,you cant possibly be lit enough to misrepresent anything..Take my apologies.

b says "more than one or two" isn't two more than 1?