Jump to content

Jadeja case went too far - Anderson


Recommended Posts

Posted

James Anderson has said that he believes his ICC charge for his clash with Ravindra Jadeja at Trent Bridge, which left him facing the prospect of a ban before the case was thrown out, went "too far" and he was relieved that "common sense" prevailed. Anderson was laid with a Level 3 charge following the first Test after an altercation inside the pavilion where India claimed Anderson had shoved Jadeja without provocation. He was cleared before the fourth Test and the judge's verdict was critical of a number of aspects of the case. "But I'm very aware of the boundaries and of overstepping the mark - and if I've ever been close the umpires are straight on it; there are stump microphones there. I'm very aware of everything there and I don't overstep the mark." © ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted
Pansy indians...:haha:
Real pansy was when Ranatunga took the entire SL team out of the ground when Darrell Hair called Murali a chucker. Ranatunga knew Murali is nothing short of a javelin thrower yet he supported this cheat. And now after 17 years he comes to media and says illegal action bowlers must be banned. Thats called PANSY :nice:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...