JaFanatic Posted November 5, 2014 Share Posted November 5, 2014 Er... you questioned the explanation. So' date=' either you have a better explanation or you think that their team selection does not involve putting the best eleven on the field.[/quote']Sure I dont believe maxwell is the best they have to play in a test side Link to comment
JaFanatic Posted November 5, 2014 Share Posted November 5, 2014 Ohh baby... got hurt? I have been extremely civil in my conversation with you up until this point, but you have continued your insinuations without reason. Can't you just participate in a debate without name-calling or is that too much to ask?So ? it doesn hide the hatred craps you have been posting here Link to comment
skindia Posted November 5, 2014 Share Posted November 5, 2014 100th ton was not coming so I asked our selectors how to bring that ton?I was very serious,bcci selectors told me in asia cup against bangladesh it would come just play slow,rest would take place,I got very relaxed after they told me this;-) Link to comment
Texan Posted November 5, 2014 Share Posted November 5, 2014 Sure I dont believe maxwell is the best they have to play in a test side It was their gamble, but it was not intended for "appeasing" a senior player. My point is that Aussies make decisions that could involve rubbing some senior players the wrong way. On many occasions they have dropped senior players in order to maintain their high performance culture. For us to drop senior players though, it takes long looooonnggg periods of non-performance to even start contemplating such a move. From all the news items I have read, it appears that Chappell did not want to wait these super long periods of non-performance and get replacements when the seniors stopped performing. Link to comment
Texan Posted November 5, 2014 Share Posted November 5, 2014 So ? it doesn hide the hatred craps you have been posting here So, if it is not in your culture to behave in a civil manner when the other party has been civil, then there is perhaps no point in continuing a slanging match. Link to comment
JaFanatic Posted November 5, 2014 Share Posted November 5, 2014 Ok whats your excuse for Ponting ? Link to comment
Precambrian Posted November 5, 2014 Share Posted November 5, 2014 ..... and persisting with non-performing seniors paid superb dividends in the Aus and England tours for us. We won in eng and lost narrowly in aus with our seniors. Link to comment
Texan Posted November 5, 2014 Share Posted November 5, 2014 How is that going to be relevant for this thread? Link to comment
JaFanatic Posted November 5, 2014 Share Posted November 5, 2014 So' date=' if it is not in your culture to behave in a civil manner when the other party has been civil, then there is perhaps no point in continuing a slanging match.[/quote'] Defintely whining like a butthurt idiot is not my culture Link to comment
rkt.india Posted November 5, 2014 Share Posted November 5, 2014 Good to see Sachin speaking something for once in life. Greg Chappell was a stupid coach. He wanted to be ringmaster with players being just animals to him. Every single guys has spoken against him. He tried to finish Sachin where he has 5 more glorious years of cricket left. I want him to talk about match fixing saga in early 2000s. Greg Chappel's tenure wasn't that bad. He was just a misfit to Indian culture. Link to comment
Texan Posted November 5, 2014 Share Posted November 5, 2014 We won in eng and lost narrowly in aus with our seniors. Which series are you talking about? We got blanked 8-0 in Eng and Aus in 2011-12 by persisting with non-performing seniors. Link to comment
Texan Posted November 5, 2014 Share Posted November 5, 2014 Defintely whining like a butthurt idiot is not my culture ohhh, but hurling abuses sure is.. Link to comment
rkt.india Posted November 5, 2014 Share Posted November 5, 2014 Lol why ask me ? you already came to a conclusion they only pick the best that is there Another gem from the holy Texan asking an icfer to explain aussie team selection :haha: He was picked because they do not have many options. They played him at 3 because he is one of their best players of spin. Link to comment
JaFanatic Posted November 5, 2014 Share Posted November 5, 2014 ohhh' date=' but hurling abuses sure is..[/quote'] No it isn Link to comment
JaFanatic Posted November 5, 2014 Share Posted November 5, 2014 He was picked because they do not have many options. They played him at 3 because he is one of their best players of spin. Why not Clark or Smith Link to comment
Precambrian Posted November 5, 2014 Share Posted November 5, 2014 It was their gamble' date=' but it was not intended for "appeasing" a senior player. My point is that Aussies make decisions that could involve rubbing some senior players the wrong way. [b']On many occasions they have dropped senior players in order to maintain their high performance culture. For us to drop senior players though, it takes long looooonnggg periods of non-performance to even start contemplating such a move. From all the news items I have read, it appears that Chappell did not want to wait these super long periods of non-performance and get replacements when the seniors stopped performing. Oh come on. Isn't it time to quit this "Whatever Aussies do is great" logic? In Ponting's last 6 years of cricket, he averaged exactly 40 with the bat from 59 test matches. Six whole years. I don't know which Indian senior got that much of a leeway? And please don't tell me 40 is a great average to justify the continued selection of a no.3 for six years. During these 6 years, Australia were decimated twice in India, lost the Ashes twice at home and away, lost twice to South Africa, heck even were held to a draw by New Zealand at home. Neat logic eh? Link to comment
Precambrian Posted November 5, 2014 Share Posted November 5, 2014 Can Texan please also tell why Australia is continuing to open with Chris Rogers even though his age (37) is greater than his batting average (36)? Link to comment
JaFanatic Posted November 5, 2014 Share Posted November 5, 2014 Seems Texan has no reason for Ponting inclusion in his last 2 or 3 seasons Link to comment
rkt.india Posted November 5, 2014 Share Posted November 5, 2014 Why not Clark or Smith Clark doesn't bat in top order. He always prefers to bat at mostly 5, not even 4. Maxwell was just used as a scapegoat. Link to comment
BeautifulGame Posted November 5, 2014 Share Posted November 5, 2014 Can Texan please also tell why Australia is continuing to open with Chris Rogers even though his age (37) is greater than his batting average (36)? Because he has a great record in county cricket and knows English conditions and has very good record in england Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now