rkt.india Posted November 30, 2014 Posted November 30, 2014 It is hilarious to see the double-standards of some ppl here. Seems like there is one rule for PWI' date=' RR, KTK, DC, Lalit Modi, Sharad Pawar, Jag Dalmiya..... but there is another rule for Prophet Srinavasan Anna, Thiru Maninder Singh Dhobi Anna [/quote'] RR is not disbanded. KTK, PWI, and DC had finacial issues. PWI didnt provide bank gurantee. KTK had had issues with ownership. DC owners were trying to sell theie franchise without paying to BCCI. Neither Srinivasan or any CSK player found involved in betting or fixing like RR. Srinivasan has COI and that certainly will be dealt by SC. CSK should be reauctioned to someone or Srinivasan must stay away from any BCCI post.
yoda Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 Conflict of interest issue was always there. CSK as a franchise wont be removed' date=' only be reauctioned to someone else.[/quote'] It was already addressed by SC couple of years ago and SC left it to BCCI to resolve it. None of the current mess with spot fixing/betting have anything to do with that issue.
zep1706 Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 Why the feck is Stuart Binny's name still in the title of this thread? Poor job mods.
rkt.india Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 It was already addressed by SC couple of years ago and SC left it to BCCI to resolve it. None of the current mess with spot fixing/betting have anything to do with that issue. I dont remember that. Still, CSK can be scrapped because of Mayappan betting who was their team principal.
yoda Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 I dont remember that. Still' date=' CSK can be scrapped because of Mayappan betting who was their team principal.[/quote'] Don't see no reference to Team Principals, whatever that phrase means. The franchise didn't do the betting, India Cements the Group Company didn't do any betting, no team owner did any betting as far as we know. Where does a "Team Principal" stand with reference to "Franchise, Group Company or owner"? If his activities are being associated with the Franchise, that would be incorrect. That is probably why the SC is going in the direction of Conflict of interest instead of Meyappan's betting.
Crookbond Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 ^ Mugdal Report has used "Team Principal" synonymous with owner and said that pretty clear in the 1st report. SC is going on both directions - Meiyappan's betting AND Srinivasan conflict of interest.
StriKe Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 Hearing started :nervous: FirstpostSports @FirstpostSports 2m2 minutes ago #Mudagl report hearing resumes: SC asks BCCI about IPL's business model #cricket
-Robin- Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 CNN-IBN News @ibnlive 8m8 minutes ago Noida, Uttar Pradesh JUST IN: Srinivasan tells court all allegations against him are incorrect #IPLCorruption Srini :cantstop:
-Robin- Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 CNN-IBN News @ibnlive · 7m 7 minutes ago BREAKING | SC asks @BCCI to explain financial working of BCCI and IPL #IPLScam
StriKe Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 FirstpostSports @FirstpostSports SC frowns at name dropping by N Srinivasan's counse FirstpostSports @FirstpostSports Srini's counsel took the name of Arun Jaitley thrice in the Supreme Couty FirstpostSports @FirstpostSports SC responded by telling Srini's lawyers: Do not drop names. FirstpostSports @FirstpostSports Srinivasan to SC: I acted immediately against Meiyappan and Raj Kundra
StriKe Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 FirstpostSports @FirstpostSports 2m2 minutes ago Srinivasan to SC: If there is a conflict of interest for me, then there is a conflict for Shastri, Gavaskar, Ganguly
FischerTal Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 mindset of a criminal. if i go down, everyone goes with me :phehehe:
-Robin- Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 cricketnext @cricketnext 8m8 minutes ago IPL Scam: Supreme Court adjourns hearing on IPL Corruption case to Monday.
StriKe Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 FirstpostSports @FirstpostSports On December 9, SC has set aside all day to hear the matter #Mudgal #IPLFixing FirstpostSports @FirstpostSports #Mudgal #IPLspotfixing case has been adjourned till December 8 Live
Crookbond Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 mindset of a criminal. if i go down' date=' everyone goes with me :phehehe:[/quote'] Na, he's actually right. Conflict of interest in Indian cricket is deep down. For example, the physio of the Indian team is the same as that of Mumbai Indians. During IPL, if an Indian team player has injury he has conflicting goals. It was same for Anil Kumble but people let it go because Kumble was a man with a clean collar image.
rkt.india Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 FirstpostSports @FirstpostSports 2m2 minutes ago Srinivasan to SC: If there is a conflict of interest for me, then there is a conflict for Shastri, Gavaskar, Ganguly How?
rkt.india Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 These posts are honorary, no salary posts that is what increases such conflicts. Kumble left KSCA because he wasnt getting anything being there while with RCB and Tenvic which is his player agency, he was earning his living.
achilles Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 FirstpostSports @FirstpostSports 2m2 minutes ago Srinivasan to SC: If there is a conflict of interest for me, then there is a conflict for Shastri, Gavaskar, Ganguly Srinivasan is going to make Dhobi look like a victim here.... Oh God!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now