Jump to content

Srinivasan,Raj Kundra named in IPL scandal report

Malcolm Merlyn

By Malcolm Merlyn
in Cricket Talk

Recommended Posts

rkt.india Grand Master

rkt.india

Posted
Posted
It is hilarious to see the double-standards of some ppl here. Seems like there is one rule for PWI' date=' RR, KTK, DC, Lalit Modi, Sharad Pawar, Jag Dalmiya..... but there is another rule for Prophet Srinavasan Anna, Thiru Maninder Singh Dhobi Anna :hail:[/quote'] RR is not disbanded. KTK, PWI, and DC had finacial issues. PWI didnt provide bank gurantee. KTK had had issues with ownership. DC owners were trying to sell theie franchise without paying to BCCI. Neither Srinivasan or any CSK player found involved in betting or fixing like RR. Srinivasan has COI and that certainly will be dealt by SC. CSK should be reauctioned to someone or Srinivasan must stay away from any BCCI post.
Link to comment
yoda Newbie

yoda

Posted
Posted
Conflict of interest issue was always there. CSK as a franchise wont be removed' date=' only be reauctioned to someone else.[/quote'] It was already addressed by SC couple of years ago and SC left it to BCCI to resolve it. None of the current mess with spot fixing/betting have anything to do with that issue.
Link to comment
rkt.india Grand Master

rkt.india

Posted
Posted
It was already addressed by SC couple of years ago and SC left it to BCCI to resolve it. None of the current mess with spot fixing/betting have anything to do with that issue.
I dont remember that. Still, CSK can be scrapped because of Mayappan betting who was their team principal.
Link to comment
yoda Newbie

yoda

Posted
Posted
I dont remember that. Still' date=' CSK can be scrapped because of Mayappan betting who was their team principal.[/quote'] Don't see no reference to Team Principals, whatever that phrase means. The franchise didn't do the betting, India Cements the Group Company didn't do any betting, no team owner did any betting as far as we know. Where does a "Team Principal" stand with reference to "Franchise, Group Company or owner"? If his activities are being associated with the Franchise, that would be incorrect. That is probably why the SC is going in the direction of Conflict of interest instead of Meyappan's betting.
Link to comment
StriKe Newbie

StriKe

Posted
Posted

FirstpostSports ‏@FirstpostSports SC frowns at name dropping by N Srinivasan's counse FirstpostSports ‏@FirstpostSports Srini's counsel took the name of Arun Jaitley thrice in the Supreme Couty FirstpostSports ‏@FirstpostSports SC responded by telling Srini's lawyers: Do not drop names. FirstpostSports ‏@FirstpostSports Srinivasan to SC: I acted immediately against Meiyappan and Raj Kundra

Link to comment
Crookbond Newbie

Crookbond

Posted
Posted
mindset of a criminal. if i go down' date=' everyone goes with me :phehehe:[/quote'] Na, he's actually right. Conflict of interest in Indian cricket is deep down. For example, the physio of the Indian team is the same as that of Mumbai Indians. During IPL, if an Indian team player has injury he has conflicting goals. It was same for Anil Kumble but people let it go because Kumble was a man with a clean collar image.
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...