CG Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 Nearly 70% of indias wickets are of bouncers and short of length deliveries. There seem to be an plan to bowl short of good length at body and use bouncer a over.Defending High totals and bowling under lights has helped but will this continue to work. In nz on shorter grounds its a huge risk .
MK55 Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 The team will have to rethink the short ball tactic when it comes to some Australian/New Zealand or English batsmen. Short bowling was a bit excessive today on the Perth pitch..So we might have to show a bit more restraint. I still feel we have to use the short ball and the back of the length stuff to other batsmen but just a bit more judiciously. The size of these grounds and the presence of bowlers such as Yadav/Shami to exploit this tactic has also contributed. We'll be travelling to New Zealand for the remainder of the group games. But we might not face problems since we'll be facing weaker oppositions there..
BlueBee Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 English batsmen are no longer good players of short ball. ^
adi B Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 Indian bowlers have pace,avg speed of all 3 combined is 140+ so it's a good ploy to use bouncers as a surprise delivery especially with long boundaries and 2 bouncer rule
MK55 Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 English batsmen are no longer good players of short ball. ^ Yes most English players aren't good against the short ball. But for some others like may be Root or Bell we might have to rethink.
BlueBee Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 I think Mohit got carried away with the bounce a bit in the mid overs. Should have done them by 120 in this pitch.
velu Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 Don't think we are dumb enough to apply the same strategy everywhere Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
MK55 Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 And we wont be playing in New Zealand in the QF/SF. So don't have to worry about the shorter boundaries. We are all set to meeting Australia in semis. Even if AUS finishes third, we won't be playing SF in NZ assuming that we win the Qf
CG Posted March 6, 2015 Author Posted March 6, 2015 The team will have to rethink the short ball tactic when it comes to some Australian/New Zealand or English batsmen. Short bowling was a bit excessive today on the Perth pitch..So we might have to show a bit more restraint. I still feel we have to use the short ball and the back of the length stuff to other batsmen but just a bit more judiciously. The size of these grounds and the presence of bowlers such as Yadav/Shami to exploit this tactic has also contributed. We'll be travelling to New Zealand for the remainder of the group games. But we might not face problems since we'll be facing weaker oppositions there.. Yadav and shami have extra pace and on flat pitches its better than straying on offstump like we used to do earlier bowling at the body cramps them of room. Good think is it worked against sa who are good players of short bowling but in nz its harakiri on short grounds.If the pitch has something to offer will we be able to adapt that has to be seen .
CG Posted March 6, 2015 Author Posted March 6, 2015 And we wont be playing in New Zealand in the QF/SF. So don't have to worry about the shorter boundaries. We are all set to meeting Australia in semis. Even if AUS finishes third, we won't be playing SF in NZ assuming that we win the Qf Against aussie this plan will be tested at sydney.
gaurav92 Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 Bouncers should be used as a surprise delivery and not as a stock delivery. Shami used it more often than not. It may work in your favour against sides not that good against short pitch stuff, but against sides like NZ, Aus SAF and Eng, Indian bowlers need to be fuller. Shami and Yadav has the extra mile to surprise the batsman and really hurry on. The short ball should be used sparingly hence.
BeautifulGame Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 Bouncers should be used as a surprise delivery and not as a stock delivery. Shami used it more often than not. It may work in your favour against sides not that good against short pitch stuff' date=' but against sides like NZ, Aus SAF and [b']Eng, Indian bowlers need to be fuller. Shami and Yadav has the extra mile to surprise the batsman and really hurry on. The short ball should be used sparingly hence. Eng are **** scared of short ball lol.
gaurav92 Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 Demons of Ishant Sharma in CT13 Final followed by the Lord Test :haha:
Scarves Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 It is both. The Windies game showed that India bowled the short ball well but also showed how bad the Windies batted. If anything you do this against SA, Australia and NZ it is not going to work. India did well against SA by bowling it in the corridor at a good length.
cowboysfan Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 whats amazing is that Mohit is getting wickets bowling his 135 k thunder bolts,i dont know if it will keep working down the line but i am really surprised.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now