HippoSucks Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 He's a tailender, so let's not even bowl a fast bowler against him. He obviously can't handle 140 km/h so we have to bowl spinners.
nballa Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 Yadaav had it coming. He did the same to rubel hossain
CG Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 Yadaav had it coming. He did the same to rubel hossain Lol everybody does it if you watched the test series everybody got peppered with short balls from both sides.
jonas10 Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 He's a tailender' date=' so let's not even bowl a fast bowler against him. He obviously can't handle 140 km/h so we have to bowl spinners.[/quote'] Youre utterly retarded if you think fast bowling and bowling a bouncer to someone thats a tailender up 100 runs is the same thing.
Cricketics Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 Totally fine. Out bowlers try it too even though we aren't as good as them.
Zero_Unit Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 Lol for a guy that likes to proclaim how everything done is within their right you certainly have problems with my comments. Nothing that I've said is wrong. Australians want to cry of Phil Hughes and then aim to intentionally injure a tail ender when they got a 100 run lead. Their hypocrisy is shamefully obvious. This wasn't rahane they were pitching up to. It was a non batsmen who could have been hurt. They might as well have done a few aggressive no balls at his head. It mean 1 per bowler is allowed each match right? You're entitled to comment wtv you want but be ready to face harsh criticism for retarded comments. Like one of the commenter said previously, Yadav bowled bouncers at Rubel Hossain aswell. So by your judgement, that must have been shameful no? FYI we won that match for something like 90 ish runs. Don't tell me that the australian situation and bangladesh situation vs us is not in the same context. Yadav didn't mind dishing it out at number 10 and 11 when we were completely in the winning sit. Don't even tell me that winning by 90ish runs is not the same as winning by 100ish runs cause its the same damn thing in this context. So whats so wrong about getting it back?
fuub Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 No one is forcing Yadav to play cricket. After the first bouncer Yadav was free to walk off and retire from cricket due to fear of his life.
CoverDrive Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 Yes they do care for their own Australian players but have zero issue intentionally trying to hurt Yadav. Despite their pretend concerns they had zero issue only a few months later resuming the same reckless behavior. Karma is a real ***** and its no surprise that it was an Australian that died given how they like to bully everyone. wow this is the worst post I have seen on this forum ever
kevinpp24 Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 Yes they do care for their own Australian players but have zero issue intentionally trying to hurt Yadav. Despite their pretend concerns they had zero issue only a few months later resuming the same reckless behavior. Karma is a real ***** and its no surprise that it was an Australian that died given how they like to bully everyone. Do you even think before you write stuff like this? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
jonas10 Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 You're entitled to comment wtv you want but be ready to face harsh criticism for retarded comments. Like one of the commenter said previously, Yadav bowled bouncers at Rubel Hossain aswell. So by your judgement, that must have been shameful no? FYI we won that match for something like 90 ish runs. Don't tell me that the australian situation and bangladesh situation vs us is not in the same context. Yadav didn't mind dishing it out at number 10 and 11 when we were completely in the winning sit. Don't even tell me that winning by 90ish runs is not the same as winning by 100ish runs cause its the same damn thing in this context. So whats so wrong about getting it back? I dont agree with doing that either! Match was over no need to try and hurt a guy when the match was over whether its Rubel or Yadav.
jonas10 Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 wow this is the worst post I have seen on this forum ever Australians arnt bullies? Did they stop after first bouncer to Yadav? Concerned for his health ...no recollection of what happend to Phil Hughes? Would it be worth killing him and winning by 100 instead of 95 runs? Karma isnt real?
G_B_ Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 I personally dont see much of a problem. Its a legitimate delivery as is the one that unfortunately killed Hughes. Thats the nature of cricket. If the Indians feel he was unfairly treated then MSD should make a pact with every other captain apart from the the IPL franchise which Starc plays for to target Starcs head in the IPL. Issue closed.
vijay50 Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 Both the sides didnt have problems. Starc apologized, matter closed. But the newspaper still criticized starc bowling bouncers at Yadav. http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/cricket/australian-players-concern-for-umesh-yadav-after-hes-hit-on-the-head-shows-phillip-hughes-death-remains-frighteningly-memorable-10136140.html
Ultimate_Game Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 Both the sides didnt have problems. Starc apologized, matter closed. But the newspaper still criticized starc bowling bouncers at Yadav. http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/cricket/australian-players-concern-for-umesh-yadav-after-hes-hit-on-the-head-shows-phillip-hughes-death-remains-frighteningly-memorable-10136140.html Starc shouldn't have apologized. He was within his rights to bowl bouncers and it's up to batsmen to handle the bowling. If they can't then they have the option of getting out or walking back to the dressing room.
MCGGG Posted March 28, 2015 Posted March 28, 2015 Australian quicks would bounce their mothers in the Christmas backyard test match, we are ruthless, that's why we win WCs.
MCGGG Posted March 28, 2015 Posted March 28, 2015 Australians arnt bullies? Did they stop after first bouncer to Yadav? Concerned for his health ...no recollection of what happend to Phil Hughes? Would it be worth killing him and winning by 100 instead of 95 runs? Karma isnt real? What does Hughes have to do with it? Just admit you're butt hurt because India got hammered by Australia, again! Cricket at the highest level is a tough sport, there's no place for the faint hearted, a few decades ago prior to helmets fast bowlers looked after one another in similar circumstances, but that's not the case anymore.
jonas10 Posted March 28, 2015 Posted March 28, 2015 What does Hughes have to do with it? Just admit you're butt hurt because India got hammered by Australia, again! Cricket at the highest level is a tough sport, there's no place for the faint hearted, a few decades ago prior to helmets fast bowlers looked after one another in similar circumstances, but that's not the case anymore. I'm not butthurt. I want Australia to win in the finals they're my second favorite team. I don't agree with intentionally trying to hurt players whether they are on Bangladesh India Australia. All of this when a game is over and done on top of it.
jonas10 Posted March 28, 2015 Posted March 28, 2015 Australian quicks would bounce their mothers in the Christmas backyard test match' date=' we are ruthless, that's why we win WCs.[/quote'] I agree with this. They then put on a fake sense of acting if someone gets. Hit.... My favorite team after India for players like Gilchrist and Warne not for this two faced behavior.
Vicky95 Posted March 28, 2015 Posted March 28, 2015 Nothing wrong with Starc bowling bouncers at Umesh. Yadav should remember to do target Starc's body next time they play in a match.
Crookbond Posted March 28, 2015 Posted March 28, 2015 I don't think most of you get the point of the OP. The OP is not questioning the legitimacy of the delivery or the right of Starc to bowl a bouncer. The OP says that the given the match situation - it was in poor taste. The intention wasn't only to get Yadav's wicket. It will be interesting to see the opinions of people who support Starc think about Randiv NO ball when Sehwag was on 99.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now