tweaker Posted August 2, 2015 Posted August 2, 2015 Some people have good eye to recognise talent.How to know that a certain young player is going to be a great player.Here in this forum some people find Samson to be the next great batsman,but he does not have stats in domestic cricket to support it.How a young fast bowler,spinner can be separated fro the rest of the players who are playing in the domestic cricket.Some players are domestic gaints,some are IPL find,some comes from the age tournaments,how we can judge that the certain player is going to be next great thing.
tweaker Posted August 2, 2015 Author Posted August 2, 2015 How we can judge a young fast bowler is going to be next sensation.Out of nowhere Bangladesh got Mustfuzur.We were thinking that if we get a 150+ kmph bowler,we can easily win overseas.But we are dissapointed with Aaron & Yadav.We find Kuldeep Yadav,Pawan Suyal very promising,but they are not able to grab a place in their state team also.
tweaker Posted August 2, 2015 Author Posted August 2, 2015 How to know that out of Karun Nair,Shreyas Iyer,Ankit Bawne Kedhar Jadhav,how is going to be the player who can play in all conditions,all pitches.
India-KXIP fan Posted August 2, 2015 Posted August 2, 2015 Technically Smith, Amla, ABD are not perfect but better players are generally at ease and more in control vs quality bowlers more often. Younger guys may be inconsistent but they may have 1 or 2 innings against quality attacks on difficult pitches that really stand out show their true potential. KL Rahul seems like a really good bat for how in control he was against Aus for a majority of his innings. He made a few mistakes, got himself out, but for the most part it never looked like he didn't belong and he was at ease. Far more comfortable than Dhawan on front and back foot. Much more assured. Dhawan has a poor defense and does not know when to play sometimes. Consistent 5th stump gets him out. He relies on attacking bowler enough to put them off and make them inconsistent and it rarely work outside SC. In ODI's you rarely have a large slip cordon and he gets away with it. Plus he attacks even more. Rohit Sharma looks really good on back foot. Also his front foot shots are elegant and effortless. Technically they look good but he is beaten far too often when ball is doing something. Judgement of when to play when to leave is <<<< Vijay's. On Back foot he's solid though.
tweaker Posted August 2, 2015 Author Posted August 2, 2015 Who may be termed as good batsman ..hand eye coordination Sehwag,talent Rohit Sharma,technique Rahane,confidence Kohli,hardwork Pujara,
tweaker Posted August 4, 2015 Author Posted August 4, 2015 What does an ideal fast bowler should have ...
mishra Posted August 4, 2015 Posted August 4, 2015 To me, For a batsman Its how early the batsman starts reacting since bowlers arm is just about to reach the point of release. Quicker the batsman starts to react, more time he got to deal with ball. This is generally natural thing. Now the way they react, Say mostly on front foot(Kohli), Shuffle across (Smith), either way (Root), thats where technique comes in. Player with better technique will surely end up plling up more runs.
mishra Posted August 4, 2015 Posted August 4, 2015 What does an ideal fast bowler should have ... Ask Aussies. Its arm speed i guess which generates the pace. If a kid got very good arm speed naturally, He can be picked by the academy. But it requires some relative data on arm speed vs age to work with. Offcourse height build of bowlers matters too. Check that too.
jusarrived Posted August 4, 2015 Posted August 4, 2015 To me, For a batsman Its how early the batsman starts reacting since bowlers arm is just about to reach the point of release. Quicker the batsman starts to react, more time he got to deal with ball. This is generally natural thing. Now the way they react, Say mostly on front foot(Kohli), Shuffle across (Smith), either way (Root), thats where technique comes in. Player with better technique will surely end up plling up more runs. I kind of agree with the observation , but one big factor is adaptability . A lot of batsmen look like they have that extra time when playing on home conditions , but inspite of having good conventional technique if they cannot adapt you will see them struggling overseas . its this ability to make these small adjustments which is difficult to predict .
mishra Posted August 4, 2015 Posted August 4, 2015 I kind of agree with the observation ' date=' but one big factor is adaptability .[b'] A lot of batsmen look like they have that extra time when playing on home conditions , but inspite of having good conventional technique if they cannot adapt you will see them struggling overseas . its this ability to make these small adjustments which is difficult to predict . Its because our bowlers dont test them enough or SC pitches arent tailored to really test them. So if you put the same batsman in overseas conditions, We see them not having enough time to deal with the ball. Commies blame poor shot selection or foot movement. But issue is playing on SC wickets for so long, since they had so much time to play the ball, They got into habit of playing on front foot. Some players can change their natural instincts and adapt to the wicket. Some couldnt. For example Kohli started early, so he may find easier to adapt. Dhawan started late so is finding it difficult but case of Rohit is mystery
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now