Trichromatic Posted May 12, 2017 Posted May 12, 2017 3 minutes ago, Vilander said: Its Anti women esp in India. Wonder why you feel strongly about it lol. Marriage practices itself has been anti women in India. Should courts ban marriages?
BeautifulGame Posted May 12, 2017 Posted May 12, 2017 Marriage practices itself has been anti women in India. Should courts ban marriages? Practice or law ? Here law is allowed to abuse Women in the case of Polygamy. This is like child marriage.Just because marriages are abused in practise doesn't mean we allow Child marriage by law.
mishra Posted May 12, 2017 Posted May 12, 2017 2 hours ago, BeautifulGame said: Practice or law ? Here law is allowed to abuse Women in the case of Polygamy. This is like child marriage.Just because marriages are abused in practise doesn't mean we allow Child marriage by law. Practice. A Muslim man is told by Imam at the time of marriage. This is your first marriage. There are three more left. Come later.
tweaker Posted May 14, 2017 Author Posted May 14, 2017 Where has a whopping amount of Rs 20,000 crore, meant for workers' welfare, gone? Spent on tea parties or vacation of officials? Even the Comptroller and Auditor General doesn't know, wondered the Supreme Court. These posers were put to the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) by the Supreme Court which was left wondering as to where this huge amount of money has gone.
tweaker Posted May 17, 2017 Author Posted May 17, 2017 The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) today told the Supreme Court that triple talaq is a matter of faith being practiced by Muslims for the last 1,400 years and hence the question of constitutional morality and equity did not arise. The Muslim body also equated triple talaq with the Hindu belief that Lord Rama was born at Ayodhya.
surajmal Posted May 17, 2017 Posted May 17, 2017 Anyone following the triple talak case in SC would realize that SC as currently constituted is a gone case. Needs total rebuilding. Stripped of any gungadeens or dhimmis. After congress mukt bharat is achieved in 2 years, Sangh needs to make this their #1 priority. You can bet your life savings that resident lordships will try their damnedest to revive the corpse of congress.
tweaker Posted May 19, 2017 Author Posted May 19, 2017 There is "no question" of extending the June 30 deadline for making Aadhaar mandatory for availing benefits of various social welfare schemes, the Centre on Friday told the Supreme Court.
tweaker Posted May 23, 2017 Author Posted May 23, 2017 The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has refused to make public the list of loan defaulters with public sector banks despite an order of the Supreme Court in 2015 to make this information public.
tweaker Posted June 11, 2017 Author Posted June 11, 2017 As many as 10.52 lakh 'bogus' PAN cards of individual income tax assesses, which is around 0.4 per cent of the total such documents, cannot be termed a 'minuscule' number to harm the country's economy, the Supreme Court has said.
tweaker Posted June 14, 2017 Author Posted June 14, 2017 In a first, High Court judge CS Karnan became the only judge to retire while absconding. He has been evading the police since May 9 after the Supreme Court sanctioned an arrest warrant against him, sentencing him to a six-month jail term. The Supreme Court had held Karnan in contempt of court following a series of defiant counter-orders he had repeatedly issued against the apex court.
tweaker Posted July 4, 2017 Author Posted July 4, 2017 Making another serious observation on the government's demonetisation deadline that stopped people from exchanging their old notes beyond December 30, the Supreme Court today said the government can't deny citizens, who have valid reasons, the right to swap the scrapped notes.
tweaker Posted July 5, 2017 Author Posted July 5, 2017 The Supreme Court today reserved its order on pleas by activist Teesta Setalvad and her husband in a case lodged against them for alleged misappropriation of funds received by her NGOs for Gujarat riots victims of 2002.
tweaker Posted July 5, 2017 Author Posted July 5, 2017 The Supreme Court on Wednesday noted that embattled Sahara chief Subrata Roy has deposited Rs 710.22 crore in the SEBI-Sahara account, but warned that its cheque of Rs 552.21 crore must be realised within the July 15 deadline. The apex court rejected Roy's request to extend time beyond July 15 for realisation of this cheque.
tweaker Posted July 16, 2017 Author Posted July 16, 2017 Supreme Court on 14 July has ordered a CBI probe into the alleged extra-judicial killings that have been taking place in Manipur from 2002 to 2012 by the Indian Army, Assam Rifles and the Manipur police,
tweaker Posted July 25, 2017 Author Posted July 25, 2017 The Supreme Court (SC) on Monday refused to entertain a plea seeking probe and prosecution of various persons, including separatist leader Yasin Malik, for offences including murder of over 700 Kashmiri Pandits during the height of militancy in the Valley in 1989-90.
tweaker Posted July 25, 2017 Author Posted July 25, 2017 The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked Sahara Group's chief Subrata Roy to deposit Rs 1,500 crore with market regulator Sebi (Securities and Exchange Board of India) and directed the Bombay High Court liquidator to start the process of selling Sahara's Aamby Valley property.
tweaker Posted July 26, 2017 Author Posted July 26, 2017 The Supreme Court is currently hearing arguments to rule on whether the right to privacy is a fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution to all Indian citizens. The verdict will be divulged any day now, and it will surely be a crucial one – not only because privacy has become a primary debate in the Digital Age but also because of the intrinsic links between privacy and the government’s push to increase the mandate of Aadhaar and UIDAI.
tweaker Posted August 4, 2017 Author Posted August 4, 2017 the Supreme Court on Thursday refused to stay the notification for using the None Of The Above option in Rajya Sabha polls in Gujarat.
tweaker Posted August 6, 2017 Author Posted August 6, 2017 Supreme Court Collegium rejects plea by Centre to review stand on having last word in judicial appointments
tweaker Posted August 7, 2017 Author Posted August 7, 2017 The Supreme Court on 2 August imposed 100% penalty on mining lease holders operating without necessary clearance in the state of Odisha.
Recommended Posts