Jump to content

The Australian Open 2017


Cricketics

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Cricketics said:

That was a brilliant point by Nadal to close out his serve. 

yes, amazing! both show sparks of brilliance, but neither is consistent. Djoker or Murray when playing their normal game are still better than these two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Singh bling said:

In early 90s Tennis used to be of such  young players that even 26-27 used to look old  and now 34 -30 year old are fighting for title

If you are rich enough to have a big time around you such as trainer and traveling coach, you can do well. There is lot of money now to afford those kind of trainers for top 50 players. Federer and Nadal have made tons of money to afford team of 10 such people for every tournament. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Cricketics said:

If you are rich enough to have a big time around you such as trainer and traveling coach, you can do well. There is lot of money now to afford those kind of trainers for top 50 players. Federer and Nadal have made tons of money to afford team of 10 such people for every tournament. 

there are younger players in the top 50 who can afford 10 trainers as well.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, kruiser said:

Mentally, Nadal is in much stronger position. you can see specially when he defends breakpoints... He does not have to do anything extra now, just keep holding! 

Fed will not win any more slams... sad to see :(

Hang on. Nadal's all three service game have gone to deue this set. Federer got a big chance here as he breaks and then holds.

 

4-3 Federer now. Nadal to serve. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Cricketics said:

If you are rich enough to have a big time around you such as trainer and traveling coach, you can do well. There is lot of money now to afford those kind of trainers for top 50 players. Federer and Nadal have made tons of money to afford team of 10 such people for every tournament. 

In 90s Men's tennis used to be service dependent. That's why big serve was basic necessity.We had seen Sampras , Ivanisevic etc big serve and volley players .from 2000s it changed Andy Roddick with his big serve was not so sucessful

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...