Jump to content

There is no place for Rahane in the LOI Team


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have been saying this for a long.He simply good enough for ODIs.

 

Selecting him in the ODIs not only hampers our ODI team but also the test team as his failures in odis affects his form in tests.

 

Its just the result of clueless selectors who cant differentiate performances between different formats 

Posted
5 minutes ago, BeautifulGame said:

I have been saying this for a long.He simply good enough for ODIs.

 

Selecting him in the ODIs not only hampers our ODI team but also the test team as his failures in odis affects his form in tests.

 

Its just the result of clueless selectors who cant differentiate performances between different formats 

 

If 70 ODIs havent taught us what will.We are just hurting the ODI team and ruining a very good test player.

Posted

And there is no place for KL Rahul too in the ODI side. Rahane can be excused of being out of form. KL rahul is not made for ODI cricket. The kind of lottery batsman he is, he does not deserve to be in the test side either. 

 

Murali Vijay and Tailunt should be our best openers. It's a shame because tailunt is also shite against the swinging ball and raw pace.

Posted
2 minutes ago, narenpande1 said:

And there is no place for KL Rahul too in the ODI side. Rahane can be excused of being out of form. KL rahul is not made for ODI cricket. The kind of lottery batsman he is, he does not deserve to be in the test side either. 

 

Murali Vijay and Tailunt should be our best openers. It's a shame because tailunt is also shite against the swinging ball and raw pace.

 

Murali?LOL.He is like Rahane.

Posted
2 minutes ago, narenpande1 said:

And there is no place for KL Rahul too in the ODI side. Rahane can be excused of being out of form. KL rahul is not made for ODI cricket. The kind of lottery batsman he is, he does not deserve to be in the test side either. 

 

Murali Vijay and Tailunt should be our best openers. It's a shame because tailunt is also shite against the swinging ball and raw pace.

In ODIs Rohit is exceptional against raw pace and very good against moving ball.

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Sidhoni said:

We still need him in England, as backup if not in the 11

No the back up batsman should a versatile player able to play in multiple positions to cover for injuries. Should be Pandey

Edited by BeautifulGame
Posted
 

He isnt good enough to be even our 3rd back up.

Better than Rahul in those conditions at least. Actually on potential if the ball swings he is better than Rohit too but his mindset is problematic.

Posted
1 minute ago, GautiMaan said:

List of openers better than Rahane

New ones

Mayank Agarwal

Rishab Pant

Mandeep SIngh

Older ones

Gambhir

Uthappa

 

 

Apart from Pant who is untested that is a horrible list.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Sidhoni said:

Better than Rahul in those conditions at least. Actually on potential if the ball swings he is better than Rohit too but his mindset is problematic.

No he isnt.Rohit is very good in ODIs even in swinging conditions.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Sidhoni said:

Better than Rahul in those conditions at least. Actually on potential if the ball swings he is better than Rohit too but his mindset is problematic.

 

I would  rather try out a new batsman than a tried and tested failure.

Posted
6 minutes ago, express bowling said:

Pant needs to be tried ASAP.

 

On his day, he will take the game away 

 

If you don't have consistent batsmen it  is better to have really high SR ones.

 

Should have been in this match.If not him atleast Pandey.But we chose Rahane. :wall:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...