Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
17 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

Lalit Yadav looks like a prolific wicket-taker like Shami, Siraj and Bumrah

In earlier games when he played alongside Umesh, he looked like trying too hard, to match Umesh in pace and in that effort was losing his shape. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

In earlier games when he played alongside Umesh, he looked like trying too hard, to match Umesh in pace and in that effort was losing his shape. 

 

Probably.

 

But, he needs to use the bouncer more often 

Posted
9 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

In earlier games when he played alongside Umesh, he looked like trying too hard, to match Umesh in pace and in that effort was losing his shape. 

same was the case with gordon greenidge and viv richards ...while batting

Posted
2 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

Probably.

 

But, he needs to use the bouncer more often 

yes, he needs to work on his short ball.  His body falls away when he tries to bowl bouncer, very much like Ishant.

Posted
7 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

Probably.

 

But, he needs to use the bouncer more often 

saw his bowling....generally bowls back of length....needs to bowl much fuller ...batsmen easily go on back foot to play back of length...needs to bowl the length where batsman is confused with forward or backward with no foot movement...just like zaheer khan

Posted
4 minutes ago, LORD_analyst said:

saw his bowling....generally bowls back of length....needs to bowl much fuller ...batsmen easily go on back foot to play back of length...needs to bowl the length where batsman is confused with forward or backward with no foot movement...just like zaheer khan

check the videos i posted in the new thread. all are those type of lengths you are talking abouut.

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, LORD_analyst said:

saw his bowling....generally bowls back of length....needs to bowl much fuller ...batsmen easily go on back foot to play back of length...needs to bowl the length where batsman is confused with forward or backward with no foot movement...just like zaheer khan

Has bowled a very good length in the 2nd innings.

 

Some of the short of length balls are set-up deliveries to much fuller deliveries too.

Edited by express bowling
Posted
2 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

Shami was wayward. Lalit has not been wayward. Shami has improved a lot since he improved his runup. Shami had a bad runup that led to lack of control. There is no such issue with Lalit.

shami was going at 5.5r po in  recent sri lanka tests for his first spell ...in each innings while our ATG phaassst yadav was going at 6 rpo

Posted
1 minute ago, LORD_analyst said:

shami was going at 5.5r po in  recent sri lanka tests for his first spell ...in each innings while our ATG phaassst yadav was going at 6 rpo

He picked 10 wickets in that series at an average of 17 and an ER of 2.9. No idea what are you talking about.

Posted
2 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

He picked 10 wickets in that series at an average of 17 and an ER of 2.9. No idea what are you talking about.

first spell...he made up the economy well in 2,3,4 th spells

Posted
3 minutes ago, LORD_analyst said:

first spell...he made up the economy well in 2,3,4 th spells

maybe because new ball comes onto the bat well and is the best time to bat in normal SC conditions. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

maybe because new ball comes onto the bat well and is the best time to bat in normal SC conditions. 

yup ....attacking bowlers generally go for runs ...but ATG PHASSST yadav seems a bit-legsidh at times and can be expensive too

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...