mishra Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 2 hours ago, cric_fan said: Indian fans still crying. Love it In all honesty, Records of these so called people who made it Imran way to be struck off. If it wasnt HD cameras your players were always mistaking a cricket ball with a muffin Link to comment
rkt.india Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 4 hours ago, the don said: Applying a foreign object to the ball is illegal and dravid was found guilty much like mike atherton and the dirt . There are many ways to help aid unnatural swing. saliva is foreign object? Turning_track 1 Link to comment
MechEng Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 Dravid is guilty there, you can see he's changing the position of yellow sweet on the ball with his fingers, he's not that innocent to not realise he's applying foreign substance on a side of the ball. Imran Khan did seem to tamper the ball, the first ball to Gavaskar was a bouncer which swung away to wicket keeper, the next ball nipped back in sharply, reverse swing there. Link to comment
HippoSucks Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 Why is this being argued? Sarfraz, Imran, and everyone from their team tampered the ball. So did everyone else at that time, especially the English, but they weren't as good. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now