Jump to content

Hardik Pandya doesn't contribute with bat, lucky to be called all-rounder: Roger Binny


saik

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

gladly 

rohit sharma avg in sa is 15 and his highest score is 47

Pandya avg 20 in Sa with highest as 94

 

Rohit sharma is yet to hit a 50 in test in SA

So to prove your point you misrepresent facts. Look at the number below and you will see that you are putting incorrect information. I finally fact checked you and you are caught misrepresenting. They are both less than 20.

 

Rohit: 11, 10, 10, 47  Ave = 19.5

 

Pandya: 93 , 1, 15, 6, 0, 4 Ave =  19.8

 

Now take the fluky 93 out when SA had no information about this player. After that coaches had enough tape/information on him and they sorted him and he got into double digits only once.

 

Now look at Rohit. Finally he got his footing back and scored a 47 and was dropped because of haters like you.

 

Only in your dream world is Pandya better bat than Rohit. 

Link to comment
57 minutes ago, Khota said:

Rohit: 11, 10, 10, 47  Ave = 19.5

 

Pandya: 93 , 1, 15, 6, 0, 4 Ave =  19.8

 

Now take the fluky 93 out when SA had no information about this player. After that coaches had enough tape/information on him and they sorted him and he got into double digits only once.

 

Now look at Rohit. Finally he got his footing back and scored a 47 and was dropped because of haters like you.

That is one of the dumbest posts I have seen on ICF :rofl: 

 

Using your logic, it can be argued that likes of Rohit are already sorted out by competition so struggle to score even a 50 :facepalm:

 

Since there are 5 specialist batting slots available so Ind has the option to select the best 5. The 6th struggling batsman can be replaced by a decent AR, who could add value in other departments

 

If you were a lawyer, you would prove your client to be guilty in trying to prove his/her innocence 

Edited by zen
Link to comment
20 minutes ago, zen said:

That is one of the dumbest posts I have seen on ICF :rofl: 

 

Using your logic, it can be argued that likes of Rohit are already sorted out by competition so struggle to score even a 50 :facepalm:

 

Since there are 5 specialist batting slots available so Ind has the option to select the best 5. The 6th struggling batsman can be replaced by a decent AR, who could add value in other departments

 

If you were a lawyer, you would prove your client to be guilty in trying to prove his/her innocence 

Do you ever read your posts before punching Submit Reply?

Link to comment
48 minutes ago, Khota said:

Do you ever read your posts before punching Submit Reply?

the trend you posted, if you did that in brick and mortar world, you would be laughed out of a room :facepalm: 

 

Keep the entertainment coming

Edited by zen
Link to comment
3 hours ago, zen said:

the trend you posted, if you did that in brick and mortar world, you would be laughed out of a room :facepalm: 

 

Keep the entertainment coming

I am extremely comfortable with what I believe in. I dont need approval from the sheeple.

Link to comment
9 hours ago, Khota said:

So to prove your point you misrepresent facts. Look at the number below and you will see that you are putting incorrect information. I finally fact checked you and you are caught misrepresenting. They are both less than 20.

Wrong rohit has toured Sa in 2013 also n he failed their

So he had prior exp and shud have done better 

9 hours ago, Khota said:

 

Rohit: 11, 10, 10, 47  Ave = 19.5

 

Pandya: 93 , 1, 15, 6, 0, 4 Ave =  19.8

Actually i shud match Rohit 2013Sa tour stats to hardik current that wud be fair coz this was rohit 2nd tour and pandya 1st

9 hours ago, Khota said:

 

Now take the fluky 93 out when SA had no information about this player. After that coaches had enough tape/information on him and they sorted him and he got into double digits only once.

Rohit in 2 tour cudnt even play a fluke 

9 hours ago, Khota said:

Now look at Rohit. Finally he got his footing back and scored a 47 and was dropped because of haters like you.

yes a 47 is enough to save him from his epic disastor perfomances in overseas

9 hours ago, Khota said:

 

Only in your dream world is Pandya better bat than Rohit. 

again prove what has rohit sharma done in test cricket then say this , pandya has a 100 outside india and 94 in sA 

rohit has none, better batsman my foot

Link to comment
4 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

Wrong rohit has toured Sa in 2013 also n he failed their

So he had prior exp and shud have done better 

Actually i shud match Rohit 2013Sa tour stats to hardik current that wud be fair coz this was rohit 2nd tour and pandya 1st

Rohit in 2 tour cudnt even play a fluke 

yes a 47 is enough to save him from his epic disastor perfomances in overseas

again prove what has rohit sharma done in test cricket then say this , pandya has a 100 outside india and 94 in sA 

rohit has none, better batsman my foot

Long post and you still did not respond to stating misleading facts deliberately. It is a credibility issue and you are not faring well.

Link to comment
36 minutes ago, Khota said:

Long post and you still did not respond to stating misleading facts deliberately. It is a credibility issue and you are not faring well.

again no answer....

My question was simple what has rohit sharma done in test cricket, the guy avg lower then bhuvi n ashwin overseas. 

answer nhin hai to rehne de

Link to comment
5 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

again no answer....

My question was simple what has rohit sharma done in test cricket, the guy avg lower then bhuvi n ashwin overseas. 

answer nhin hai to rehne de

My question is that you deliberately mislet on the stats to prove a point. You did to stats what Aussies to did to the balle. You are tampering with stats and you have been caught misrepresenting. Can you man up and apologize.

Link to comment
7 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

again no answer....

My question was simple what has rohit sharma done in test cricket, the guy avg lower then bhuvi n ashwin overseas. 

answer nhin hai to rehne de

If you really want to compare batting of Rohit with Ashwin and claim Ashwin and Bhuvi are better bats then I am truly speechless. enjoy your day.

Link to comment
17 minutes ago, Khota said:

If you really want to compare batting of Rohit with Ashwin and claim Ashwin and Bhuvi are better bats then I am truly speechless. enjoy your day.

ashwin has 2 100s overseas, better avg 

done better on many tours then rohit sharma

 

Bhuvi has played many cruicial knocks overseas, cnt remeber more then 1-2 from rohit 

If ur telling rohit is a better test batsman then ashwin :laugh1::laugh1::laugh1::laugh1:

Edited by Ankit_sharma03
Link to comment
11 minutes ago, Khota said:

My question is that you deliberately mislet on the stats to prove a point. You did to stats what Aussies to did to the balle. You are tampering with stats and you have been caught misrepresenting. Can you man up and apologize.

rohit has done nything in test cricket  n i have tampered stats

Please tell me what has he done in test cricket 

Link to comment
12 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

ashwin has 2 100s overseas, better avg 

done better on many tours then rohit sharma

 

Bhuvi has played many cruicial knocks overseas, cnt remeber more then 1-2 from rohit 

If ur telling rohit is a better test batsman then ashwin :laugh1::laugh1::laugh1::laugh1:

You are truly clueless. Don't keep on digging a hole.

Link to comment
1 minute ago, Khota said:

You are truly clueless. Don't keep on digging a hole.

 

1 minute ago, Khota said:

The point was you deliberately misstating facts.

i think ur the one who is clueless, coz u still havent been able to present one fact in favour of rohit sharma the test cricket

i have shown many

 

All u can say is words like clueless, useless, speechless......where as reality u have no facts

 

cmmn counter me , show me rohit perfomances in test cricket 

Link to comment
1 minute ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

 

i think ur the one who is clueless, coz u still havent been able to present one fact in favour of rohit sharma the test cricket

i have shown many

 

All u can say is words like clueless, useless, speechless......where as reality u have no facts

 

cmmn counter me , show me rohit perfomances in test cricket 

You misrepresented facts. You blatantly lied. I calculated the acverage and presented to you. What more do you want?

Link to comment
Just now, Khota said:

You misrepresented facts. You blatantly lied. I calculated the acverage and presented to you. What more do you want?

i didnt lie .....u just took this series, why to ignore 2013 tour 

N even if compare this tour hardik highest was 94 n rohit 47.....pandya made double 

 

why wud not count 2013 horrible tour of SA of rohit , when u wanna criticise pandya on his 1st tour

waha hypocricy

 

and again i asked u show me what has rohit done in test ......waiting for the answer

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...