Jump to content

Has there been a player more cringy than Hardik Pandya?


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Khota said:

I am very impressed. Against a world renonwed lineup of Singh, rankin, Chase and Thomson. I am impressed. 

so what do u have to say about his innings

Pak Ct 2017 final- gr8 bowling

Aus chennai- good bowling attack

Sa 1st test- Gr8 bowling lineup

 

Rabbada, steyn , philander, hassan ali, amir, shadab - halwa bowlers acc to u 

 

N also most of ur specialist batsman failed to score much on those days, must say many flukes

 

Probably u wud watching football then

 

Link to comment
45 minutes ago, Khota said:

 

For the upteent times let me repeat cricket averages the way these are done are not correct. If you really think that pandya is a better bat than Rohit, raina, Dhawan and gambhir I really dont have the bandwidth to waste time on people like you.

 

When he scores and takes wickets we can discuss him all day long. he has done nothing yet.

Owned! Take that, u Pandya fans :finger: Either prove that Pandya has good batting/bowling average as per the khota numeric system (has to be certified from khota@icf only) or STFU.

Link to comment
52 minutes ago, Clarke said:

Owned! Take that, u Pandya fans :finger: Either prove that Pandya has good batting/bowling average as per the khota numeric system (has to be certified from khota@icf only) or STFU.

 

1 hour ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

so what do u have to say about his innings

Pak Ct 2017 final- gr8 bowling

Aus chennai- good bowling attack

Sa 1st test- Gr8 bowling lineup

 

Rabbada, steyn , philander, hassan ali, amir, shadab - halwa bowlers acc to u 

 

N also most of ur specialist batsman failed to score much on those days, must say many flukes

 

Probably u wud watching football then

 

My patience is running ouT:

SA ODI   Dhawan   pandya

      1         35            3

       2         51           -

       3         76          14

       4       109           9

 

You can complete rest of the table.

 

Only in your world pandya is a better batsman than Dhawan. You are truly gifted stupid.

 

The day Pandya proves he is better than Dhawan under any conditions I will be the first one to admit. Meanwhile you will still stay stupid. Step out of your moms basement and see the real world.

Link to comment
14 minutes ago, Khota said:

 

My patience is running ouT:

SA ODI   Dhawan   pandya

      1         35            3

       2         51           -

       3         76          14

       4       109           9

 

You can complete rest of the table.

 

Only in your world pandya is a better batsman than Dhawan. You are truly gifted stupid.

 

The day Pandya proves he is better than Dhawan under any conditions I will be the first one to admit. Meanwhile you will still stay stupid. Step out of your moms basement and see the real world.

dufffer read properly i never wrote Pandya is a better batsman then dhawan

N the context i was talking was test cricket 

 

U were comparing specialist n bits n pices, n i showed how a bits n pieces has a 90+ then dhawan n rohit in SA.....so the whole theory is stupid 

 

Forget football n cricket u hardly understand the diff between odi n test cricket 

 

They both are not even competing for same spot dhakkan

Link to comment
On 6/29/2018 at 5:16 PM, Khota said:

How does someone who is the worst bowler and batsman provide balance? I have to grant he had a good IPL .

 

He is the best bowler among batsmen AND the best batsman among bowlers.

 

He provides balance because he contributes with both bat and ball complimenting other 10 'specialists'.

 

Replace Pandya with a specialist bowler/batsman and it will weaken either batting/bowling in a big way.

 

Link to comment
Just now, philcric said:

 

He is the best bowler among batsmen AND the best batsman among bowlers.

 

He provides balance because he contributes with both bat and ball complimenting other 10 'specialists'.

 

Replace Pandya with a specialist bowler/batsman and it will weaken either batting/bowling in a big way.

 

wo bhaisahaab

7 no pe karthik, rahane ko khilayega ya axar , jadeja ko 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

dufffer read properly i never wrote Pandya is a better batsman then dhawan

N the context i was talking was test cricket 

 

U were comparing specialist n bits n pices, n i showed how a bits n pieces has a 90+ then dhawan n rohit in SA.....so the whole theory is stupid 

 

Forget football n cricket u hardly understand the diff between odi n test cricket 

 

They both are not even competing for same spot dhakkan

Am I allowed t stoop to your level?

Link to comment
1 hour ago, philcric said:

 

He is the best bowler among batsmen AND the best batsman among bowlers.

 

He provides balance because he contributes with both bat and ball complimenting other 10 'specialists'.

 

Replace Pandya with a specialist bowler/batsman and it will weaken either batting/bowling in a big way.

 

So he is the worst batsman among bats and the worst bowler anomg bowlers. Am I right?

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, Khota said:

Am I allowed t stoop to your level?

wow u read those wish u cud read my post as well

coz when u have no counter ull make a accusation that i said dhawan is a better batsman then pandya (where did i say that )

when ill ask u what did u specialist rohit sharma do in SA as compare pandya (ull have no answer so u wnt bring his name)

 

Put ur glasses read what m writing

Both have diff roles so m not comparing but m talking about team contribution. My point a specialist will fail to contribute most say but an all rounder or bits pieces will contributed most days So hence pandya contributed as much as ur specialist n at times even more 

naaki m comparing 

 

Samjhe genius 

 

so keep ur point to ur self since u have neither facts neither numbers

 

Link to comment
33 minutes ago, Khota said:

So he is the worst batsman among bats and the worst bowler anomg bowlers. Am I right?

 

Bowlers ... Yes, he is the lesser of the 5 bowlers. Not to say he is a poor bowler. His performances are somewhere in the vicinity of a frontline bowler. 

 

Batsmen ... Can't say. To have a SR of 115 and average 30 in ODIs at #7, not many would be able to do it. Anyway a pure batsman can't play at #7, that would leave the team with only 4 bowlers.

 

Play a bowler at #7, it will significantly reduce the overall batting strength of the team.

 

You seem to be having a difficulty in understanding the composition/balance of a cricket team and different roles players have within the team.

 

Link to comment
1 minute ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

n how have i made him a superstar , he is far far far away from that

According to you he is a great number 7 sure he played well in the finals but one off innings is not what is needed of him.He should do it on a regular basis in South Africa after making 91 he was failure.If he becomes consistent then its great for Indian cricket.Yesterday yes he played well but it was against Ireland question is if he can do it on a regular basis against bis teams.

Link to comment
Just now, The Unrealist said:

According to you he is a great number 7 sure he played well in the finals but one off innings is not what is needed of him.He should do it on a regular basis in South Africa after making 91 he was failure.If he becomes consistent then its great for Indian cricket.Yesterday yes he played well but it was against Ireland question is if he can do it on a regular basis against bis teams.

yes he has been gr8....look at his numbers n compare to many who has batted at that spot 

N lets not forget he was almost fast tracked, so my expectation from him is diff to a someone else who has played 4-5 yrs of domestic 

Every one failed in Sa apart from virat . Pujara , rohit, dhawan, vijay were on their 2-3 tour of Sa so why such expectation from A player who is so low on experience . Atleast he played one major knock 

Its not easy to score in SA , even dravid avg 29 their and many top batsman avg go for toss

 

We have to keep our expectation in acc to a player. U dnt expect bhuvi tomm to start bowling at 150k 

Its not easy to make runs at 7 on regular basis be it anyone coz u dnt get regular batting n time to spend on pitch, after a point when u look at ur previous score they look small coz ur cming to bat at 7 and its affects confidence

 

Even the greater yuvraj singh didnt had gr8 numbers at 7. Consistency shud be expected if he bats at 4-5 

 

We shud keep our expectation in control for some yrs, he is fast tracked. Even guys like yuvraj ,sehwag, zak took yrs to be consistent.

 

 

Link to comment
5 hours ago, Khota said:

So many people have backed him and still he has nothing to show for. I needs runs on the boards and wickets. Not someone being backed up.

 

Batting ...

Test - 37 Avg, 85 SR, 1 100 and 3 50s in 10 innings.

ODI - 30 Avg, 116 SR, 4 50s in 21 innings.

T20 - 148 SR

 

Bowling ...

ODI - 39 wickets in 37 matches.

T20 - 27 wickets in 31 matches.

 

Doesn't look like he has nothing to show for.

 

 

Link to comment
4 minutes ago, philcric said:

 

Batting ...

Test - 37 Avg, 85 SR, 1 100 and 3 50s in 10 innings.

ODI - 30 Avg, 116 SR, 4 50s in 21 innings.

T20 - 148 SR

 

Bowling ...

ODI - 39 wickets in 37 matches.

T20 - 27 wickets in 31 matches.

 

Doesn't look like he has nothing to show for.

 

 

start preparing for this reply (this means when a fact or stats goes against him the avg, stats have no meaning)

4 hours ago, Khota said:

 

For the upteent times let me repeat cricket averages the way these are done are not correct.

 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...