How badly would have Kohli been missing another spinner right now?

[sensible-indian]

1 minute ago, rkt.india said:

its not just about last 5 years.  It is about history.

Its not about history cos in the past our pacers sucked even more....so eben if spinners played, results were gonna be same. 

 

Now it can make a difference.

 

Completes the attack. 

[CG]

Its not about history cos in the past our pacers sucked even more....so eben if spinners played, results were gonna be same. 
 
Now it can make a difference.
 
Completes the attack. 

We have a world-class attack for any pitch.

[sensible-indian]

Our pacers are so inconsistent. 

 

World beater in one spell and average in next.

 

86-7 quickly turned into 115-7

 

30 runs. 

Edited August 3, 2018 by sensible-indian

[sensible-indian]

40 added with ease. 

[rkt.india]

14 minutes ago, sensible-indian said:

Our pacers are so inconsistent. 

 

World beater in one spell and average in next.

 

86-7 quickly turned into 115-7

 

30 runs. 

you are bound to have partnership

[sensible-indian]

2 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

you are bound to have partnership

Yes but not leak runs like this. 

 

Had they bowled well and scored, u can say well played but we were spraying it. 

 

The moment spinner is taken off, runs started flowing. 

 

On an overcast day in England. Lol. 

[zen]

Pant, Pandya and Kuldeep should be in the 11 

[CG]

Yes but not leak runs like this. 
 
Had they bowled well and scored, u can say well played but we were spraying it. 
 
The moment spinner is taken off, runs started flowing. 
 
On an overcast day in England. Lol. 

If you don't take catches batsman will make runs.

[Khota]

1 hour ago, rkt.india said:

Pandya and Kohli partnership is what kept us in the game when we were 100/5, could easily have been 150 all out. Those runs and most importantly the time that partnership had consumed made sure that difficult time was seen off. In these conditions, 5th bowler is a luxury because your main bowlers are effective enough.  You do need a decent enough batsman at 7 and his bowling is a bonus. we can even play an extra batsman in place of Pandya but will Nair or Pujara do enough.

I will take Nair the batsman over Pandya the batsman.

[sensible-indian]

5 minutes ago, CG said:

19 minutes ago, sensible-indian said:

Yes but not leak runs like this. 
 
Had they bowled well and scored, u can say well played but we were spraying it. 
 
The moment spinner is taken off, runs started flowing. 
 
On an overcast day in England. Lol. 

If you don't take catches batsman will make runs.

Yes true. But why do they hav to spray it?