yoda Posted March 19, 2008 Posted March 19, 2008 Well give him custody and then she can have the lifestyle you deem she needs. I am talking about this case based on the fact that she has the kid. Not sure who wanted and who didn't want the kid. From what I gather ' date=' he was willing to settle for that amount outside the court ... She wanted 250 million dollars... The concept of prenuptial took it's nascency in USA because of litigation like this ... You can't expect the man to shell out 250 million dollars for four years marriage ...[/quote'] 250 is too much. 50 seems reasonable.
Zap_Brannigan Posted March 20, 2008 Posted March 20, 2008 Why does she deserve the 50 million $?? That is not for the kid. The ***** gets it. Meanwhile, the kid gets 70,000 $ per year for its expense apart from school and nanny payments. It should have been the other way round. The kid should have got 50 million $ and the ***** should have been made to earn her own money like the way she used to, by making porn.
CC1981 Posted March 20, 2008 Posted March 20, 2008 Unless you plan to get a really rich dulhan!:D Rich dulhan or kangaal dulhan, i dont' care really. I am all about living on my two feet- and if situation gets really dire, i might-just might- ask for help from parents/loved one/closest friends, which i pay back/will pay back ASAP. And most certainly, i aint into demanding money from my spouse simply coz i married her and she was a millionairess- not only do i consider that to be below the belt and taking undue advantage of the situation, its pretty big hit to my 'atma-samman'. And these are the qualities i look for in a woman i date/want to get serious with as well- if she has the idea that i owe her anything materialistic (like money,property,car etc) coz she married me, she is just one step removed from a whore in my eyes.
CC1981 Posted March 20, 2008 Posted March 20, 2008 It all depends on the life style you want your kid to have and how much money the kid as his heir deserves to get. Paul M's kid deserves to live like a queen and yes, 50 mill is prolly enough, but nothing for Sir Paul to be so adamant about not giving. If Paul McCartney's kid deserves a millionaire lifestyle, then Paul should put that money in her name in a trust fund and not give a penny to the mother- why should SHE deserve that much money ? And who deciedes what kind of lifestyle the kid is entitled to ? indeed, what really is the kid entitled to, apart from having a place to stay and call home, food, education and clothing till he/she turns 18 ? If Paul M deciedes that his kid would hold a part time job to pay for his/her movie tickets and all he is going to give is his/her education and living expenses till he/she turns 18 and then ask them to earn their own living, it is most certainly his perogative and he should have the full right to make that call. That his wife demanded 250 million and settled for 50 million only shows one thign: she is one step removed from being a whore.
Zap_Brannigan Posted March 20, 2008 Posted March 20, 2008 That his wife demanded 250 million and settled for 50 million only shows one thign: she is one step removed from being a whore. Not really. She was a whore "professionally" in the late 80's/early 90s.
CC1981 Posted March 20, 2008 Posted March 20, 2008 Not really. She was a whore "professionally" in the late 80's/early 90s. well then i take it back. Completely satisfied with the decision- not so much as the chick deserving the money, but as in McCartney deserved the outcome if he was dumb enough to marry a professional whore in his 50s- you'd think that with his kind of experience and globetrotting resume, he'd be a bit more sensible than forgetting every inch of commonsense over some poontang.
Zap_Brannigan Posted March 20, 2008 Posted March 20, 2008 well then i take it back. Completely satisfied with the decision- not so much as the chick deserving the money' date=' but as in McCartney deserved the outcome if he was dumb enough to marry a professional whore in his 50s- you'd think that with his kind of experience and globetrotting resume, he'd be a bit more sensible than forgetting every inch of commonsense over some poontang.[/quote'] The guy was married to Linda until she died,which is very uncommon for anyone much less a famous and rich musician. So he probably thought that true love would hit him again.
CC1981 Posted March 20, 2008 Posted March 20, 2008 hmm...so he found 'true love' (whatever the hell it meant for him), stuck it out till his beloved died and then went straight into the arms of a hooker expecting true love ? Wow....either he was seriously taken advantage of during his greiving process or he is one dumb tosser.
Zap_Brannigan Posted March 20, 2008 Posted March 20, 2008 hmm...so he found 'true love' (whatever the hell it meant for him), stuck it out till his beloved died and then went straight into the arms of a hooker expecting true love ? Wow....either he was seriously taken advantage of during his greiving process or he is one dumb tosser. Everyone predicted this even before the marriage. He had a fallout with this children because they were against this marriage. Everyone knew she was a gold digger. His fans saw it, the media saw it, his children saw it. He was the only one who cdnt see what she really was. So yeah, he was dumb.
King Tendulkar Posted March 20, 2008 Author Posted March 20, 2008 hmm...so he found 'true love' (whatever the hell it meant for him), stuck it out till his beloved died and then went straight into the arms of a hooker expecting true love ? Wow....either he was seriously taken advantage of during his greiving process or he is one dumb tosser. He did not realise she was a hooker
Zap_Brannigan Posted March 20, 2008 Posted March 20, 2008 He did not realise she was a hooker People don't pay hookers for sex. They pay them to leave right after sex. Unfortunately, he had to spend 4 years with her.
beetle Posted March 20, 2008 Posted March 20, 2008 People don't pay hookers for sex. They pay them to leave right after sex. Unfortunately, he had to spend 4 years with her. :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
kumble_rocks Posted March 20, 2008 Posted March 20, 2008 One thing we all can agree , Sir Paul is a senile old fool ...
Dhondy Posted March 20, 2008 Posted March 20, 2008 Assuming that the separated couple made love thrice a week, that's £38,461 per fuc k. Kinda expensive, innit?
coffee_rules Posted March 20, 2008 Posted March 20, 2008 C'mon people, enough with the name calling. Haven't you ever bought a lottery ticket? Do you call yourself a whore for being a opportunist? Do you abuse yourself when you buy a stock and it's price goes up? This is life. She saw a door and went inside. That's all. He is rich enough to sustain the loss. It's a small nuisance for him.
Guest HariSampath Posted March 21, 2008 Posted March 21, 2008 Hey...look, while this looks very much like money grabbing, McCartney knew this perfectly when he got married. As they say, there is no fool like an old fool, but what the heck, if McCartney has a billion bucks and wanted to hire an expensive whore for 50 millions, he has every right. The settlement was just a case of the price haggling. If the lady had given her services, bore his baby etc she deserves whatever she and the baby can get legally to live a lifestyle ( as they would have with McCartney). She got laid, so she gets paid What pisses of Mccartney is the $ 700 per hour he is paying may probably include all the time other blokes had a go, and he ends up with the tab !
Rajiv Posted March 21, 2008 Posted March 21, 2008 Assuming that the separated couple made love thrice a week, that's £38,461 per fuc k. Kinda expensive, innit? ..AHEM, if he actually enjoyed it
Recommended Posts