rkt.india Posted November 2, 2024 Posted November 2, 2024 19 hours ago, bowl_out said: Jurel retention was clownery. Could have got him at less than half that price in the auction. They could have either let that spot unfilled or retained Buttler at that price Buttler may not have agreed to that price
Mariyam Posted November 2, 2024 Posted November 2, 2024 20 hours ago, bowl_out said: Jurel retention was clownery. Could have got him at less than half that price in the auction. They could have either let that spot unfilled or retained Buttler at that price They seem to be taking a risk. If Jurel manages to displace Pant as India's short format wicketkeeper, his brand and by extension the brand of the franchise increases. One of those players who *could* have a multiplier effect.
bowl_out Posted November 2, 2024 Posted November 2, 2024 47 minutes ago, Mariyam said: They seem to be taking a risk. If Jurel manages to displace Pant as India's short format wicketkeeper, his brand and by extension the brand of the franchise increases. One of those players who *could* have a multiplier effect. They already have the player who could replace Pant in White Ball cricket as their captain Jurel isn't even in the T20I squad yet
bowl_out Posted November 2, 2024 Posted November 2, 2024 Venky Mysore has said that Shreyas was their first choice retention and he apparently refused. Our so called superstars think so highly of themselves. Will Shreyas really go for more than 18 cr in the auction?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now