tapandrun Posted August 30 Posted August 30 (edited) 2 hours ago, vvvslaxman said: Stuart broad disagrees wobble seam is a new thing. As per him Ambrose, Walsh, Sutart clark were bowling that. Just that they didn't have a name for that. that is what i thought. May be they called scrambled seam or something like that. I remmeber Chaminda vaas gripping the ball slanting with 3 quarterseam in his grip. Tendulkar has been drawn into false shot a few times. Yes , it not new thing. but bowler now know how to bowl it , how to be more efficient and how to repeat it. This is similar to reverse-swing , its not like ball was not reversing previously but teams didnot know why and how its heaping and how to repeat it. Holding a slanted seam or scrambled seam and bowling and hoping it does something is diff than knowing what exactly it will do. so now bowler have more control and they know what they are doing Edited August 30 by tapandrun
Manucrick Posted August 30 Posted August 30 Legwan gone Pooks cricket fans always argue that Legwan is better than Pant
Lone Wolf Posted August 30 Posted August 30 11 minutes ago, Manucrick said: Legwan gone Pooks cricket fans always argue that Legwan is better than Pant This was most likely legwan's last test inns. Manucrick 1
govinda Posted August 30 Posted August 30 21 minutes ago, Manucrick said: Legwan gone Pooks cricket fans always argue that Legwan is better than Pant Only morans on pp argue that Manucrick 1
vvvslaxman Posted August 30 Posted August 30 36 minutes ago, tapandrun said: Yes , it not new thing. but bowler now know how to bowl it , how to be more efficient and how to repeat it. This is similar to reverse-swing , its not like ball was not reversing previously but teams didnot know why and how its heaping and how to repeat it. Holding a slanted seam or scrambled seam and bowling and hoping it does something is diff than knowing what exactly it will do. so now bowler have more control and they know what they are doing Knowing is one thing. Most of the great art in fast bowling is well known. Mastering is another hting. Mcgrath , Malinga bowling on a dime is still a thing not easy to master. tapandrun 1
vvvslaxman Posted August 30 Posted August 30 Ollie is one wicket away from reachign 100 wickets at an average under 20 !!!
vvvslaxman Posted August 30 Posted August 30 Pakistan is at the bottom of the table in WTC. They might finish there at this rate.
vvvslaxman Posted August 30 Posted August 30 Looking at how Hasan mahmud troubled Australia and looking at how Ollie bowls i think England missed the tricket in Australia.
vvvslaxman Posted August 30 Posted August 30 (edited) WTC 2025-2027 cycle best bowlers average under 20 (min 10 wickets) Not a single INdian is in this list. Ollie RObinson 3 tests 23 wickets 8.34 average Simon Harmer 4 test 30 wickets 14.30 average Henry 3 test 16 wickets 14.50 avge Hazlewood 5 test 22 wickets 15.00 average M Jansen 3 tests 12 wickets 15.33 avge Duffy 3 test 23 wickets 15.43 average Mitch starc 10 tests 58 wickets 16.98 average Pat cummins 6 tests 21 wickets 17.71 avge Muthuswamy 3 tets 12 ickets 18.75 avge Abbas 5 tests 28 wickets 18.96 average Neser 3 tests 15 wickets 19.93 avge Siraj 11 tests 43 wickets 26.81 avge Jadeja 11 tests 33 wickets 36.66 avge Bumrah 7 tests 29 wickets 22.55 avge Kully 5 tests 21 wickets 26.95 avge Prasdham 5 tests 21 wickets 32.90 avge Suthar 2 tests 16 wickets 21.06 avge Akash deep 3 tests 13 wickets 36.46 avge Sundar 8 tests 11 wickets 49.63 avge Edited August 30 by vvvslaxman
sage Posted August 30 Posted August 30 16 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: Ollie is one wicket away from reachign 100 wickets at an average under 20 !!! How many have done this before?
vvvslaxman Posted August 30 Posted August 30 3 minutes ago, sage said: How many have done this before? There might be many if you go all time. But if we start looking after 1970 not many. South Afiricans due to the over whelmingly favorable conditions there may be a few.
vvvslaxman Posted August 30 Posted August 30 Bumrah ~ 22 Donald ~ 25 AMbrose ~ 23 Marshal ~ 25 Mcgrath ~ 24 Steyn ~ 21 Rabada ~ 23 I guess i can't find a player post 1970 that reached 100 wickets at an avge less than 20 !! Ollie will be in elite club sage 1
tapandrun Posted August 30 Posted August 30 1 hour ago, Lone Wolf said: This was most likely legwan's last test inns. No, they keep recycling same players. Everyone in Pak team is a version of rahane who are just playing 1 career extending innings here and there. He is ageing and is on steep decline. Manucrick 1
tapandrun Posted August 30 Posted August 30 37 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: Looking at how Hasan mahmud troubled Australia and looking at how Ollie bowls i think England missed the tricket in Australia. Tink last time he toured there he was bowling off-spin Lone Wolf and Manucrick 2
sage Posted August 30 Posted August 30 13 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: Bumrah ~ 22 Donald ~ 25 AMbrose ~ 23 Marshal ~ 25 Mcgrath ~ 24 Steyn ~ 21 Rabada ~ 23 I guess i can't find a player post 1970 that reached 100 wickets at an avge less than 20 !! Ollie will be in elite club AI tells me Ian Botham England 19 18.97 Waqar Younis Pakistan 20 sub-20 Shaun Pollock South Africa — sub-20 Vernon Philander
Lone Wolf Posted August 30 Posted August 30 7 minutes ago, tapandrun said: Tink last time he toured there he was bowling off-spin Plus Mahmud is deceptively quicker and bowls upto 135-137ks as well. Ollie barely touches 130k on an odd occasion. Both though are experts at wobble seam. Next year Mahmud and BD will put up a better showing in that one off test at Lord's
Lone Wolf Posted August 30 Posted August 30 11 minutes ago, tapandrun said: No, they keep recycling same players. Everyone in Pak team is a version of rahane who are just playing 1 career extending innings here and there. He is ageing and is on steep decline. His real age might be 37-38.. gets cramps as frequently as Kedar Jadhav used to get. I think that Ghori fella who replaced him in ODIs will replace him in Birmingham
Lone Wolf Posted August 30 Posted August 30 Shakeel gets 97... No ton, no honours board. Tribute to GG with that 97
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now