Jump to content

Is Michael Vaughan a cheat?


Recommended Posts

Sorry mate, I dont have it, maybe someone will post it soon the funniest thing is with the De Villiers situation Vaughan was shaking his head in disbelief in the dressing room and now he does the same thing lol
I guess what goes around comes around or the other way in this case!
Link to comment
Sorry mate, I dont have it, maybe someone will post it soon the funniest thing is with the De Villiers situation Vaughan was shaking his head in disbelief in the dressing room and now he does the same thing lol
He was shaking his head thinking "He stole my idea and beat me to it. Now I have to do it asap to impress the coach".
Link to comment

Don't know if he's a cheat, but he and the English selectors are prize idiots. They have proven that many times. Darren Pattinson at Headingley when Matthew Hoggard and Simon Jones were fit for selection? If you had to take a punt, why not on Jones? The guy has been in great form all season.

Link to comment
He was shaking his head thinking "He stole my idea and beat me to it. Now I have to do it asap to impress the coach".
Vaughan has a famous and rather recurrent shake of the head when he does something dodgy. The habit first surfaced in 2002/03 in India when he pushed the ball away with his hand and did not think the Indians should appeal for obstruction
Link to comment
Freddie bowling Amla pops the ball up to Vaughan at cover Vaughan diving forward, has the ball bounce in front of his hands and he claims the catch another referral and things resolved
what double standards by both TMS and SKY guys, how can they say Amla got benefit of doubt , when replays clearly showed the ball bounced before the catch was taken by captain, I am very amused by ALL england commentators both on BBC and SKY are saying Amla got benefit of doubt, that is just so wrong. Micheal Holding clearly was one person who was right in saying yes ball bounced before Vaughan caught the ball and everybody else wanted amla gone when he was not out, didnt Kevin peterson got called back last year against india then every body on TMS and SKY were saying wow justice is done right decision is made and now the very same people are saying Amla should have gone or he got benefit of Doubt, there was no doubt in that was not a catch thats why he was called back. Botham was saying how can coach ask for third umpire replay in this case , in case of kevin peterson he was saying wow good thing he was stopped by his team mates now he has nerve to complain about Amla who i thought was very nice guy was walking before umpire raised his hands.
Link to comment
what bulshit.now they are blaming the 2-d tv replays saying it distorts the image.The ball clearly bounced and the 3rd umpire agreed.these england supporters are crazy.
Lucky for South Africa third umpire didnt turn out to be like bruce oxynford who gives decisions only favour for his home team,
Link to comment
as much a cheat as dhoni or ganguly then...
Yeh probably but this thread was just made because i made one for De Villiers, but like in Vaughan's case I can't really call him a cheat because it would be difficult for him to tell whether he took the ball or not. And i believe that was the case too with Ganguly and Dhoni
Link to comment
vaughan's dropped catch- http://www.dailymotion.com/**********videos/video/x66ef1_vaughan-disputed-catch_sport can the commentators be more biased?.shameful ,even the indian commentators will not stoop so low.the ball clearly touched the ground.even if there is doubt then the batsman gets the benefit of the doubt.
thanks for the video, the link is getting blocked by icf swear filter(i think) so heres the full screen link/http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/x66ef1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...