Desi Cartman Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 Walking ..... walking .... :regular_smile: so donny , is it gonna be 1-Nil or 2-Nil .. Link to comment
bharat297 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 i wouldnt speak yet ... theyre fighting back the Aussies are. Link to comment
DomainK Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 If they tampered with the ball and yet lose the match, they should find 'chullu bhar paani'. Link to comment
h4te Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 the worst thing in this all is the Bowden tapped on Dar's back and told Dar to calm down and pulled Dar away. WTF? Dar is doing his job. GTFO u farking Aussie ***** Kisser! Link to comment
bharat297 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 It would be funny if Ponting, who tried to rush through his overs so he wouldnt get done for slow over rates, gets done for ball tampering. Link to comment
Sachinism Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 No action will be taken, its Australia after all Link to comment
flamy Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 It would be funny if Ponting' date=' who tried to rush through his overs so he wouldnt get done for slow over rates, gets done for ball tampering.[/quote'] :cantstop::cantstop: Link to comment
King Tendulkar Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 the worst thing in this all is the Bowden tapped on Dar's back and told Dar to calm down and pulled Dar away. WTF? Dar is doing his job. GTFO u farking Aussie ***** Kisser! Exactly Link to comment
King Tendulkar Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 Are the umpires going to report the aussies and ponting and will the match referee take any action? This is justs a joke now 1. Clear evidence of ball tampering. Clear TV footage. 2. Slow over rates again. 3. Ponting continually arguing with the umpires like with the over throws, ball tampering and other occassions. Can't do it, action has to be taken. Link to comment
bharat297 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 I saw the footage for the first time ... Cam White was plucking leather off the ball ... you can not do that. Lets see if anything happens to them. Reverse swing is due to a disparity in weight between the different sides of the ball. When you pluck a chunk of leather from one side, that disparity gets magnified and the ball reverses more. Link to comment
Chalks Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 No action taken. F'n biased, racist scum. :mad: When are these filth going to get their comeuppance? Link to comment
Guest Hiten. Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 Why are you guys exaggerating unnecessary context of the game ? Lets talk about the ball tampering when the officials do report the issue to the referee. Cricketics is just asking a question and not saying that they DID tamper the ball. This forum is slowly turning into a racist one, quite disheartening. Link to comment
bharat297 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 ^ I do not condone any racist remarks made but on the issue itself ... don't you think the video evidence was fairly damning. White was blatantly removing leather from the ball. There was a lot more evidence here than in the Pakistan case at the Oval (where Australian cricketers lauded Darryl Hair for just doing his job) Now if that needed to be done ... he must inform the captain and the captain must ask the umpires permission and remove the leather in front of the umpires. That didnt happen and the necessary action should be taken. If this gets swept under the rug, then its another example of the Australian cricket team getting away without penalty from the ICC. Thats not a racist remark. I am just fed up with the Australian cricket team critcising other teams about their poor records yet nothing will happen about this meaning the Aussies can maintain a clean sheet. Link to comment
Guest Hiten. Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 ^ I do not condone any racist remarks made but on the issue itself ... don't you think the video evidence was fairly damning. White was blatantly removing leather from the ball. There was a lot more evidence here than in the Pakistan case at the Oval (where Australian cricketers lauded Darryl Hair for just doing his job) Now if that needed to be done ... he must inform the captain and the captain must ask the umpires permission and remove the leather in front of the umpires. That didnt happen and the necessary action should be taken. If this gets swept under the rug, then its another example of the Australian cricket team getting away without penalty from the ICC. Thats not a racist remark. I am just fed up with the Australian cricket team critcising other teams about their poor records yet nothing will happen about this meaning the Aussies can maintain a clean sheet. Billy bowden was there and he didn't think of making fuss about it. So blame it on the umpire for allowing the blatant stupidness or cheating (whichever you look at it). Link to comment
fineleg Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 ICC must take action against the Aussies. This is getting ridiculous. What are the BCCI honchos doing? They need to raise hell with ICC about this ball tampering incident. Link to comment
bharat297 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 Billy bowden was there and he didn't think of making fuss about it. So blame it on the umpire for allowing the blatant stupidness or cheating (whichever you look at it). We are !!! Read some of the posts above. Umpire Aleem Dar had a problem with it. Link to comment
Fontaine Posted November 10, 2008 Share Posted November 10, 2008 Look bluebrigade is right. There was nothing malicious or devious about it. The thing is the bit of leather would have been removed anyway be it by the umpire or player. Techniquely it's a violation of the rules because the umpire is supposed to do it so Dar gave him a warning which is fine. But let's not get carried away. White didn't try and tamper with the ball so much as remove a part that was sticking out which is EXACTLY what the umpires would have done as well. Link to comment
Desi Cartman Posted November 10, 2008 Share Posted November 10, 2008 Look bluebrigade is right. There was nothing malicious or devious about it. The thing is the bit of leather would have been removed anyway be it by the umpire or player. Techniquely it's a violation of the rules because the umpire is supposed to do it so Dar gave him a warning which is fine. But let's not get carried away. White didn't try and tamper with the ball so much as remove a part that was sticking out which is EXACTLY what the umpires would have done as well. and when SRT removed a piece of grass from the seam it was a crime ? Link to comment
Fontaine Posted November 10, 2008 Share Posted November 10, 2008 and when SRT removed a piece of grass from the seam it was a crime ? Was he found guilty of ball tampering? Link to comment
Desi Cartman Posted November 10, 2008 Share Posted November 10, 2008 Was he found guilty of ball tampering? yes Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now