panther Posted April 28, 2012 Posted April 28, 2012 _l1LPwYC-LE&feature=related 1994 i think this is before his stress fracture waqar at his fastest best.
Old guy Posted April 28, 2012 Posted April 28, 2012 wow...cricket's standard has really come down now
panther Posted April 28, 2012 Posted April 28, 2012 waqar 28 4-fors , 22 5-fors and 5 10-for in 87 test matches. wasim 20 4-fors, 25 5-fors and 5 10-for in 104 test matches Mcgrath 28 4-fors, 29 5-fors and 3 10-for in 124 test matches Walsh 32 4-fors, 22 5-fors and 3 10-fors in 132 test matches allan donald 11 4-fors, 20 5-fors and 3 10-fors in 72 test matches just 5 bowlers off the top of my head that bowled in the 90s shows how destructive waqar and donald were you can add more bowlers to the list
panther Posted April 28, 2012 Posted April 28, 2012 Ambrose another beast of the 90s 21 4-for, 22 5-for and 3 10-for in 98 test matches
panther Posted April 28, 2012 Posted April 28, 2012 Ian bishop another beast before injurys ruined his career 6 4-for and 6 5-for no 10fers in his 43 test.
panther Posted April 28, 2012 Posted April 28, 2012 any other great fast bowlers of the 90s i have missed out?
Sehwag1830 Posted April 28, 2012 Posted April 28, 2012 any other great fast bowlers of the 90s i have missed out? pollock.
panther Posted April 28, 2012 Posted April 28, 2012 dale steyn stats are even better than the bowlers of the 90s, but we should wait to see how his career finishes off.
panther Posted April 28, 2012 Posted April 28, 2012 pollock. Pollock 23 4-fors, 16 5-fors and 1 10-for in 108 test matches.
panther Posted April 28, 2012 Posted April 28, 2012 bowlers by strike rate with 100 wickets or more amazing dale steyn :hatsoff: http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=1;filter=advanced;orderby=bowling_strike_rate;qualmax1=900;qualmin1=100;qualval1=wickets;template=results;type=bowling again donald and waqar showing how destructive they were significantly better strike rates than other great bowlers of there era.
panther Posted April 28, 2012 Posted April 28, 2012 Shane bond not a bowler of the 90s but this guy was special again injury's finished him average off 22 and strike rate of 38.7 amazing. unfortunately he did not even take 100 test wickets. anyway he has 7 4-fors, 5 f-fors and 1 10-for in 18 test matches.
ravishingravi Posted April 29, 2012 Posted April 29, 2012 BOPVaMQtsL4 It was the most unbelievable series. All 3 teams had the best bowling attack. And all of them were beating each other through the series.
rkt.india Posted April 29, 2012 Author Posted April 29, 2012 wow...cricket's standard has really come down now I think batsmen have become better in terms of handling genuine pace over the years.
Old guy Posted April 29, 2012 Posted April 29, 2012 I think batsmen have become better in terms of handling genuine pace over the years. no.. likes of steyn,morkel still dominate batsmen there was some lack of bowling talent in last few years.. (when brett lee was no 1 bowler in world,no disrespect i like his bowling and attitude but still..) now some talented bowlers are coming up in every team if they develop into good bowlers good for test cricket otherwise it will be repeat of 2000's
rkt.india Posted April 29, 2012 Author Posted April 29, 2012 no.. likes of steyn,morkel still dominate batsmen there was some lack of bowling talent in last few years.. (when brett lee was no 1 bowler in world,no disrespect i like his bowling and attitude but still..) now some talented bowlers are coming up in every team if they develop into good bowlers good for test cricket otherwise it will be repeat of 2000's No. now even tailenders thrash fast bowlers.
Old guy Posted April 29, 2012 Posted April 29, 2012 No. now even tailenders thrash fast bowlers. i cant see them surviving against those yorkers of waqar...
Recommended Posts