RockStar Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 Source A particular stat stands out..:winky: Link to comment
ViruRulez Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 Source A particular stat stands out..:winky: This list shows 7 of the 11 players And the rest of the 4 players in the Indian side are not stable .. so in short we can say that India is performing as a team :yay::yay::yay: Link to comment
Anakin Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 The forum is so much cleaner now, how the times have changed :haha: Link to comment
Rajan Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 Tendulkar did not contribute substantially in 5 of the wins. he has not even scored a 50 in one of the wins. he is not a match winner. he is a choker. Tendulkar did not take (m)any wickets in the wins. there are other very reliable batsmen and attacking batsmen who contribute more in Indian wins. add more from 'there' Link to comment
graphic23 Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 Tendulkar did not contribute substantially in 5 of the wins. he has not even scored a 50 in one of the wins. he is not a match winner. he is a choker. Tendulkar did not take (m)any wickets in the wins. there are other very reliable batsmen and attacking batsmen who contribute more in Indian wins. add more from 'there' Hey, I realize there have been posts from the past that have mentioned this. But instead of just appreciating these facts, lets not try to ruin the thread, eh? Link to comment
Anakin Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 Hey' date=' I realize there have been posts from the past that have mentioned this. But instead of just appreciating these facts, lets not try to ruin the thread, eh?[/quote'] Why are you defending Endulkar? Wasn't that a popular word in here? Link to comment
King Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 It sounds like some of you blokes are waiting for someone to debate with. Get over it guys..... This thread is more like a bait. Good to see none have taken despite few trying to invoke the good old Indian debate of who's better rather than feeling happy about the way team is heading right now. Link to comment
Anakin Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 Excellent, sarcasm now equates to baiting. And of course there will not be any replies from the folks who were not quite sarcastic when rubbishing someone. Link to comment
King Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 Why should there be sarcasm? Everyone's just happy about the results and are not worried who helped get the results. I can see the bigger picture and don't mind who has a bigger hand in these wins. If everyone in the team can contribute it's more than welcome. Link to comment
Anakin Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 Why should there be sarcasm? Everyone's just happy about the results and are not worried who helped get the results. I can see the bigger picture and don't mind who has a bigger hand in these wins. If everyone in the team can contribute it's more than welcome.I Totally agree. Not everyone does though. Link to comment
Ram Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 Sach has been magnificent since England 2007. I think the WC ’07 debacle was the spark that ignited the flames that are raging now. Then, the criticism about his presence in the team was especially sharp and vile. Ian Chappell had made his now (In)famous comments about how Sachin was playing only for numbers. Even guys like Rohit Brijnath murmured a few words in disapproval. But since then though, Sachin has been simply awesome, especially in test cricket. Link to comment
DomainK Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 Sachin is no surprise. Player to note is the one leading the bowlers list. We all underestimate him and he keeps performing. Link to comment
flamy Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 The forum is so much cleaner now' date=' how the times have changed :haha:[/quote'] vaat? Link to comment
Shehezaada Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 Sach has been magnificent since England 2007. I think the WC ’07 debacle was the spark that ignited the flames that are raging now. Then, the criticism about his presence in the team was especially sharp and vile. Ian Chappell had made his now (In)famous comments about how Sachin was playing only for numbers. Even guys like Rohit Brijnath murmured a few words in disapproval. But since then though, Sachin has been simply awesome, especially in test cricket. Although he wasn't at his best, his partnerships with Ganguly and the bowling of Zaheer won us that test series. I'll never forget Tendulkar taking body blows just trying to spend time at the crease and build an unsurmountable lead. Link to comment
graphic23 Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 Although he wasn't at his best' date=' his partnerships with Ganguly and the bowling of Zaheer won us that test series. I'll never forget Tendulkar taking body blows just trying to spend time at the crease and build an unsurmountable lead.[/quote'] That was being criticized though, remember. The 82 at Trentbridge was a determined knock because it came despite a very very good spell by Sidebottom and Anderson (or the other big tall dude). Link to comment
Anakin Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 Funny thing about that list is that both the top bowler and batsman were each diagnosed to be missing a pair by resident Dr. House :cantstop: Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now