Guest gaurav_indian Posted May 24, 2009 Share Posted May 24, 2009 IPL 2008 or IPL 2009 which one was better? Oops typo someone plz correct the spelling of better in the polls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane Posted May 24, 2009 Share Posted May 24, 2009 08' - Coz i got some Live Action at the ground Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desi Cartman Posted May 24, 2009 Share Posted May 24, 2009 how about 3rd option : not much difference :dontknow: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cowboysfan Posted May 24, 2009 Share Posted May 24, 2009 2009-no contest.the pitches are awesome.we should look to import these pitches back for ipl3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Warrior Posted May 24, 2009 Share Posted May 24, 2009 '08.... it was something new,, was happening first time... was very excited.... nd it was in India Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cricketics Posted May 24, 2009 Share Posted May 24, 2009 In terms of tuff cricket, south african pitches made it reall competition between the bowlers and batters. but to look it as a package, IPL 2008 was brilliant. The atmosphere was fantastic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ViruRulez Posted May 24, 2009 Share Posted May 24, 2009 2009 for sure - the pitches were good for both the batsmen and the bowlers .. the crowds were better and the Indian domestic talents were getting proper exposure .. the best Indian domestic talents also brought out and only a few of them survived in international bouncing wickets good for bowling .. IPL 2009 has been a lot better though I miss watching the match at the stadium in India Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donkey Posted May 24, 2009 Share Posted May 24, 2009 2009 for me, cricket in india is an all out sausage fest, except for bombay. Atleast in southafrica u can spot some hunnies in the crowd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ViruRulez Posted May 24, 2009 Share Posted May 24, 2009 2009 for me' date=' cricket in india is an all out sausage fest, except for bombay. [b']Atleast in southafrica u can spot some hunnies in the crowd. I agree completely B-> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fineleg Posted May 24, 2009 Share Posted May 24, 2009 2009 Mainly because of South African conditions making it a good contest between the bat and the ball. Plus, the SA conditions can provide a glimpse to show up the FTBs from the rest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirty_South Posted May 24, 2009 Share Posted May 24, 2009 2008 was feckin brilliant,the crowd was just FANTASTIC ! Even though RCB performed poorly last time,I thoroughly enjoyed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbydhillon Posted May 24, 2009 Share Posted May 24, 2009 2009 way better , better closer games , better crowd than india Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gaurav_indian Posted May 24, 2009 Share Posted May 24, 2009 2009 way better ' date=' better closer games ,[b'] better crowd than india :hmmm: :nono: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ViruRulez Posted May 24, 2009 Share Posted May 24, 2009 2008 was feckin brilliant' date='the [b']crowd was just FANTASTIC ! Even though RCB performed poorly last time,I thoroughly enjoyed it. If you are saying about the excitement in the ground then yes but the crowd was better especially the girls in SA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vvvslaxman Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 Let me filter it. Both finals were good. In the first edition Yusuf Pathan launched an onslaught on Murali and brought home the win for Royals out of nowhere. 2nd edition BRC imploded and brought home the loss out of nowhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diegovegaz Posted May 26, 2009 Share Posted May 26, 2009 2009 was way better though the stronger teams didn't make it to finals the quality of the cricket was good it is always good to see something for the bowlers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaurav92 Posted May 26, 2009 Share Posted May 26, 2009 both were good and i feel more close matches in IPL 2 makes it good on one hand and i watched :mi: vs :kkr: at wankhede...and saw :kkr: thrashed by a thrilling :mi: win...it makes it more exciting so i think IPL 2 has to be just a bit ahead in terms of close games i loved this one IPL 1 :- 49.999999999999999999999999999999999999999 % IPL 2 :- 50.000000000000000000000000000000000000001 % think wht impact IPL 3 will have Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gult Posted May 26, 2009 Share Posted May 26, 2009 IPL 2009 is much better because the pitches have assisted both the batsmen and bowlers equally Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nikred Posted May 26, 2009 Share Posted May 26, 2009 the difference between IPL 2008 and 2009 is :dc: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted May 26, 2009 Share Posted May 26, 2009 Liked 2008 better cause the better seemed to establish themselves and showed some consistency. This season was roller coaster with teams losing and winning at random, almost to the point where it didn't even make much sense. Only good thing about 2009 was that the bowlers were able to neutralize the bats, but team inconsistency made it a bore-fest for me overall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts