cндябеяs Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 The Daily Show with Jon Stewart’ Learns Who Shah Rukh Khan Is [ame=http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xa87ri_the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-sha_fun]Dailymotion - The Daily Show with Jon Stewart _ Shah Rukh Khan Detained at Newark - a Funny video[/ame] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hiten. Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 ^^ not available in Canada :sniffle: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nikred Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 ^^ not available in Canada :sniffle: :hehe: :thefinger: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 SRK is a tool' date=' they did interrogate him but [b']because of his nefarious underworld connection and activities, they also asked him about funding sources for his Bollywood movies. Coming to think of it, I want to know how much of Indian money ends up in Paki hands (Dawood). Basically he was asked questions our dickface sleuths couldnt or wouldnt. so far there hasnt been anything to prove that he has links with the underworld,it is very wrong to say that without any proof. infact one he got threatening calls from the underworld n he duly reported it to the police Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macj Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 so far there hasnt been anything to prove that he has links with the underworld,it is very wrong to say that without any proof. infact one he got threatening calls from the underworld n he duly reported it to the police So? Cant one ask questions even? Salman Khan himself boasted of his connections, if you think SRK doesnt then that is naivete in an all new level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kumble_rocks Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 So? Cant one ask questions even? Salman Khan himself boasted of his connections, if you think SRK doesnt then that is naivete in an all new level. Entire Bollywood is tainted . Can't one ask questions to Amitabh as well ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 So? Cant one ask questions even? Salman Khan himself boasted of his connections, if you think SRK doesnt then that is naivete in an all new level. No you can't ask questions if you don't see any evidence of wrong doing. If the promoters of the event are so shady why are they still roaming free in the US? If you are a hater ofc you wouldn't mind if he is locked up in guantanamo bay with no evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seedhi Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 No you can't ask questions if you don't see any evidence of wrong doing. If the promoters of the event are so shady why are they still roaming free in the US? If you are a hater ofc you wouldn't mind if he is locked up in guantanamo bay with no evidence.Amazing. So US visitor can never be questioned unless there is solid evidence? If there were evidence of wrong doing then SRK would have been arrested. Several years ago Salman Khan and Priety Zinta were questioned by the Indian authorities about underworld funding of films - that was also wrong according to your logic, since Salman and Priety were not personally involved. After every terrorist attack in India hundreds of people are questioned for leads and evidence - this should not happen unless the person is a confirmed terrorist, according to you. According to you, no one visiting India from pakistan should be questioned unless he is confirmed to be a terrorist. You should think before writing absurd things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macj Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 No you can't ask questions if you don't see any evidence of wrong doing. If the promoters of the event are so shady why are they still roaming free in the US? If you are a hater ofc you wouldn't mind if he is locked up in guantanamo bay with no evidence. What?? The whole point of asking questions is to sniff out info, SRK is dirty , Amitabh might be and should be questioned, but theres a high chance Amitabh wont involve himself in anything that involves benefiting Pakistan like SRK shamelessly does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gunner Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 Hey let is rest guys. It was not like SRK was repeatedly sodomized by various immigration officials at Newark airport, he was just mildly fingered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hiten. Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 What?? The whole point of asking questions is to sniff out info, SRK is dirty , Amitabh might be and should be questioned, but theres a high chance Amitabh wont involve himself in anything that involves benefiting Pakistan like SRK shamelessly does. Where are you getting your facts from ? Just because SRK does not speak ill of Pakistan in public, which he shouldn't given that he is a public icon...it does not make him any lesser Indian than us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kumble_rocks Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 What?? The whole point of asking questions is to sniff out info, SRK is dirty , Amitabh might be and should be questioned, but theres a high chance Amitabh wont involve himself in anything that involves benefiting Pakistan like SRK shamelessly does. Amitabh has aligned himself with some of the most radicals elements in India. He supports and campaigns for UPA and he calls Amar Singh as his brother who btw happens to be a SIMI supporter. SIMI is a terrorist organization which sympathizes with Pakistan. So , if anything he should be questioned , right ?:winky: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
punjabi_khota Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 :banghead: Shut the **** up people...bas karo yaar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 Amazing. So US visitor can never be questioned unless there is solid evidence? If there were evidence of wrong doing then SRK would have been arrested. Several years ago Salman Khan and Priety Zinta were questioned by the Indian authorities about underworld funding of films - that was also wrong according to your logic, since Salman and Priety were not personally involved. After every terrorist attack in India hundreds of people are questioned for leads and evidence - this should not happen unless the person is a confirmed terrorist, according to you. According to you, no one visiting India from pakistan should be questioned unless he is confirmed to be a terrorist. You should think before writing absurd things. Before giving me lecture on what I should write, at least read what I wrote first. I said if there IS NO EVIDENCE, I never said SOLID EVIDENCE or IS NOT A CONFIRMED TERRORIST. Let me repeat. If there IS NO EVIDENCE, there is no point in stopping someone. You are just wasting the resources in that case. Focus your attention on the real criminals who are possibly just getting through the next counter while you waste your time on an actor visiting a country to perform a show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 :banghead: Shut the **** up people...bas karo yaar The real never ending thread needs to be given the respect it deserves. :hysterical: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seedhi Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 Before giving me lecture on what I should write, at least read what I wrote first. I said if there IS NO EVIDENCE, I never said SOLID EVIDENCE or IS NOT A CONFIRMED TERRORIST. Let me repeat. If there IS NO EVIDENCE, there is no point in stopping someone. You are just wasting the resources in that case. Focus your attention on the real criminals who are possibly just getting through the next counter while you waste your time on an actor visiting a country to perform a show.How the hell do you know that the US doesnt have any leads or evidence in this case? It is a well known fact that Bollywood and underworld have been connected. SRK is known to have received calls from Abu Salem who was part of the 1993 Mumbai blasts conspiracy. The promoters of the Bollywood show SRK was going to be part of are suspected of underworld links and fraud. Another bollywood show promoter is convicted of mortgage fraud. With all these connections, getting questioned for 66 minutes is pretty reasonable by any standards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 How the hell do you know that the US doesnt have any leads or evidence in this case? It is a well known fact that Bollywood and underworld have been connected. SRK is known to have received calls from Abu Salem who was part of the 1993 Mumbai blasts conspiracy. The promoters of the Bollywood show SRK was going to be part of are suspected of underworld links and fraud. Another bollywood show promoter is convicted of mortgage fraud. With all these connections, getting questioned for 66 minutes is pretty reasonable by any standards. US has lots of leads and evidence. SRK is connected to the underworld, he is going to be part of a show suspected to have underworld links. Yet they let him go after 66 mins. :giggle: From major underworld connections to Mr. Clean in 66 mins. :hysterical: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seedhi Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 US has lots of leads and evidence. SRK is connected to the underworld, he is going to be part of a show suspected to have underworld links. Yet they let him go after 66 mins. :giggle: From major underworld connections to Mr. Clean in 66 mins. :hysterical:Yes just like Salman Khan and Priety Zinta were let off after questioning by the CBI for the underworld funding of Bollywood movies. Just like hundreds of civilians are questioned and let off each year in India during investigations into terrorist activities. Just like in any criminal case the police ask questions to many people to glean information in order to nab the culprits. But judging by your previous responses - this simple fact is unlikely to be acknowledged by you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coffee_rules Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 :banghead: Shut the **** up people...bas karo yaar Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zubinpepsi Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 What SRK should learn from Kalam M J Akbar Sunday August 23, 2009 A celebrity is blessed with good fortune in many ways. A reporter, for instance, has to search for news. A celebrity merely has to look into the mirror. Such self-obsession requires sensational amorality and phenomenal lack of judgment. Ordinary, guilt-obsessed mortals do not possess these virtues. A celebrity must have talent, of course, but brains are useless without gall. It requires courage to fall irrevocably in love with your image. It must be dreadfully tense to watch each step you take with such missionary commitment, but the rewards are probably worth the effort. The tiniest twitch now resides beside perceived, or stolen, wisdom, on Twitter, the miracle technology of celebdom. Pseudo-gods seek the pseudo-faithful as fervently as the reverse. You have to be sure-footed to walk on air. The smallest ethereal miscalculation can bring you painfully down to earth. Shah Rukh Khan mobilized the resources of the Government of India when American customs and border security authorities treated him as just another human being. This is not his first visit to the States, so there must have been some reason for the fact that this was the first time he was detained. As it turns out, the US government did have some reasonable questions about Shah Rukh’s hosts. Old royalty used to treat an insult as high treason. What is fit punishment for the humiliation of modern divinity? A finger-wagging press conference by a mere cabinet minister seems inadequate for a mobile genius who charges crores of rupees for dancing at a wedding. Frenzy across content-starved TV channels is more like it, but we must not fetter our imagination. Perhaps India should recall its ambassador from Washington and abandon the nuclear deal unless the American secretary for homeland security is sacked? No one likes racial profiling, even when done by an arbitrary computer. The incomparable computer seems to have not only altered the dimensions of time and space in our lives, but is now beginning to create a classless society of victims as well. Karl Marx would have been delighted by this communist child of capitalism. Shah Rukh has no complaint against the computer, however. He was furious at the inflexibility of the customs officer. Indian celebrities have created such a self-mesmerizing caste system of egos that they find any challenge difficult to comprehend. Every celebrity is famous, but everyone famous is not a celebrity. Former president Abdul Kalam did not turn his cellphone into an advertising agency when confronted with an overzealous American security drill while boarding a commercial aircraft in Delhi, although he may have been within his rights to do so. President Kalam lived in the real world even when he was in Rashtrapati Bhawan. He knows that life is cluttered with glitches and inconsistencies. He shrugged in silence and boarded his flight. Nor is racial profiling unique to the US. Every marital advertisements page in an Indian newspaper throws up multiple instances of colour-profiling. On the darker side, to stretch a metaphor, there is the unadvertised community-profiling in housing. People who are otherwise perfectly reasonable dread the possibility of conflict, micro or macro, with a neighbour who is not ‘One Of Us’. Shah Rukh Khan was quick to deliver a slightly pompous sermon when his colleague in the film industry, Emraan Hashmi, complained recently that he was being denied a flat in an exclusive part of Mumbai because of his religious identity. Shah Rukh could have kept quiet, of course. But there are no brownie points for silence. You cannot be a celebrity if you do not celebrate your own importance at every opportunity. The superstar told the star to stop crying, grow up and so on. Why did Shah Rukh forget to give himself such advice when his imperial procession to Chicago was marginally interrupted? Instead, he wailed loud enough to be heard in Delhi. Celebrities, who need a course in a National School of Drama, do need to be reminded that it helps to appreciate the limits of drama, particularly when you have arrived on the national stage. Acting becomes the only reality for some superstars, and their mind turns into an assembly line production house for scripted sentences. The dazzle of arc lamps blinds the star to the slippery ooze from the ego. You can slip so easily on it. There will surely be more than one view on Emraan Hashmi’s search for upward mobility, and all sides will argue their case with perhaps more vigour than rigour. Hashmi is not yet capable of buying an independent bungalow, so all he can dream of is a better flat. But he is only pleading for a home. Shah Rukh Khan was demanding homage from the world. The difference is more than one of degree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts