coffee_rules Posted September 7, 2009 Share Posted September 7, 2009 I want to suggest 10-over innings twice over for T20s. Link to comment
Lord Posted September 7, 2009 Share Posted September 7, 2009 I want to suggest 10-over innings twice over for T20s. no,T20s are exciting as it is Link to comment
Riley's Girl Posted September 7, 2009 Share Posted September 7, 2009 How will it have more breaks? Right now we have 30 minutes break between 2 innings of ODIs. If we'll have 4 innings, it'll be like this: 1st inning:25 overs-- 10 min-- 2nd innigs:25 overs-- 10 mins-- 3rs innings:25 overs-- 10 mins-- 4th innings:25 overs Break is essentially of 30 mins only! Guess I didn't think it through. Link to comment
Riley's Girl Posted September 7, 2009 Share Posted September 7, 2009 I want to suggest 10-over innings twice over for T20s. Nope. T20's are perfect the way they are now. Link to comment
newmanthepunter Posted September 7, 2009 Share Posted September 7, 2009 come on sachin.. is that what u can come up after 20 years in cricket? Link to comment
Guest Gunner Posted September 7, 2009 Share Posted September 7, 2009 come on sachin.. is that what u can come up after 20 years in cricket? Stop trolling, you have done this on three threads so far. Link to comment
DomainK Posted September 7, 2009 Share Posted September 7, 2009 come on sachin.. is that what u can come up after 20 years in cricket? How about you getting a life? He has 20 years of cricket behind him. What you have got? Moment of strolling on the net before getting kicked out? Link to comment
Sachinism Posted September 7, 2009 Share Posted September 7, 2009 I think its that guy that who 1st registered with dhoni rocks or something and then wrote an essay of BS Link to comment
newmanthepunter Posted September 7, 2009 Share Posted September 7, 2009 guys all I had was a difference in opinion. It aint called trolling. Link to comment
DomainK Posted September 7, 2009 Share Posted September 7, 2009 guys all I had was a difference in opinion. It aint called trolling. It is trolling. You got banned, came back and got banned....and now you are back shamelessly trolling yet again. Link to comment
newmanthepunter Posted September 7, 2009 Share Posted September 7, 2009 It is trolling. You got banned' date=' came back and got banned....and now you are back shamelessly trolling yet again.[/quote'] Sorry but am new to this forum.:hatsoff: Link to comment
Sachinism Posted September 7, 2009 Share Posted September 7, 2009 You're the same guy who pretended to be Indian but then admitted to being Australian, then got banned, now your pretending to be Indian again:hysterical: Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted September 7, 2009 Share Posted September 7, 2009 that is a stupid comparison.in test the batsman has to preserve his wicket.there r fielders close to the wicket.n wicket is doing enuf to encourage bowlers.no such thing in ODIs.they have limited overs' date='flat wickets n mot more than 2 catching fielders .so thers no reason for them to go slow[/quote'] Flat wickets alright. But if couple of wickets fall, you will find yourself in deep hole with lot of overs left. If you are all out for 250 in 25 overs.. opposition has 50 overs to get that. Simple logic. More the overs less the risk will be taken. More the quota for better bowlers more the price a batsman puts for his wicket. Isn't that what they do in Tests? Putting more price on the wicket? Link to comment
Lord Posted September 8, 2009 Share Posted September 8, 2009 Flat wickets alright. But if couple of wickets fall' date=' you will find yourself in deep hole with lot of overs left. If you are all out for 250 in 25 overs.. opposition has 50 overs to get that. Simple logic. More the overs less the risk will be taken. More the quota for better bowlers more the price a batsman puts for his wicket. Isn't that what they do in Tests? Putting more price on the wicket?[/quote'] Exactly n thats why SRT's reducing the overs to 25 for two innings looks good.just 25 overs per innings would mean there no boring period.n two innings would ensure that the luck factor n effect of toss is minimised. all the preserving the wicket n scoring slow can be done in Test cricket.LOI s need to be exciting Link to comment
newmanthepunter Posted September 8, 2009 Share Posted September 8, 2009 ODI's are already interesting now with the addition of powerplays and stuff... So ICC should not confuse itself with various thoughts and spoil it... Bottom line is people still like em Link to comment
hitman1980 Posted September 8, 2009 Share Posted September 8, 2009 Don't make it 25 overs for 2 innings .. else ponting gotto retire from this too.. Wht's the difference it could make playing 5 overs more :D Link to comment
newmanthepunter Posted September 8, 2009 Share Posted September 8, 2009 Don't make it 25 overs for 2 innings .. else ponting gotto retire from this too.. Wht's the difference it could make playing 5 overs more :D Fact - Sachin retired from t20 2 years ahead of ponting Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted September 8, 2009 Share Posted September 8, 2009 Exactly n thats why SRT's reducing the overs to 25 for two innings looks good.just 25 overs per innings would mean there no boring period.n two innings would ensure that the luck factor n effect of toss is minimised. all the preserving the wicket n scoring slow can be done in Test cricket.LOI s need to be exciting Exciting doesn't mean scoring runs. Taking wickets is also exciting. You basically reject the idea of batsmen putting a price on their wicket. Let us make it 10/10 that will be even more interesting. Even more exciting. We won't have to sit through the boring [/b ]part of 7 to 15 th over.What do you say? Link to comment
hitman1980 Posted September 8, 2009 Share Posted September 8, 2009 Firstly how can u even compare tht retarded ponting with the best batsman ever ... Tht's a criminal offence in India .. :winky: Sachin retired cos his body needed rest ... Ponting retired cos he is faking so tht selectors don't sack him .. So he needed to show tht he is giving up something and results will be good in future... which u can bet will never be till he is captain.. :D Link to comment
Lord Posted September 8, 2009 Share Posted September 8, 2009 Exciting doesn't mean scoring runs. Taking wickets is also exciting. You basically reject the idea of batsmen putting a price on their wicket. Let us make it 10/10 that will be even more interesting. Even more exciting. We won't have to sit through the boring [/b ]part of 7 to 15 th over.What do you say? 7 to 15 overs is hardly boring in T20s.taking wickets is exciting but how is that possible in flat wickets in ODIs.that should be done in Test cricket on sporting wickets wat i meant was that while in T20s,batsman are always looking for that extra run,fielders r alert.in ODIs,between 15-40 overs,game goes to sleep,batsman are jogging the singles taking 4-runs per over n fielders r happy with it n dont try hard to stop it.exciting doesnt mean fours n sixes surely i agree. i have never rejected the idea of batsman a price on thier wicket,let them do that in Test cricket on tougher wickets.even in ODIs wen do it on tougher wickets,its watchable,but wen they do it on pattas,its plain boring n unacceptable Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now