An innings to remember for a lifetime. A match to forget quickly.

[DomainK]

Pulling the stats out from under the rugged carpets of Madrassa, are you ? Tendulkar scored 32 100s in winning cause, that is 71% of success. So is 29% really a large percent of centuries ending a losing cause ? And unlike Maulana Saeed Anwar, SRT takes the field whenever he scores a century (if India is batting 1st). If you want more, post more nonsense.

:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:

[Gambit]

Pulling the stats out from under the rugged carpets of Madrassa, are you ? Tendulkar scored 32 100s in winning cause, that is 71% of success. So is 29% really a large percent of centuries ending a losing cause ? And unlike Maulana Saeed Anwar, SRT takes the field whenever he scores a century (if India is batting 1st). If you want more, post more nonsense.

Sachin has more 100s in matches won than the total number of 100s made by Maulana Ga(n)war and Maulvi Panzy in their career together.

[Pak_Fan_4_Eva]

A simple 50 from Inzi was enough to guarantee us a win :P Same for Anwar Sachin`s 29% centuires resulting in a losing cause is a huge amount considering the no. of them he`s scored :P

[okko321]

Pulling the stats out from under the rugged carpets of Madrassa, are you ? Tendulkar scored 32 100s in winning cause, that is 71% of success. So is 29% really a large percent of centuries ending a losing cause ? And unlike Maulana Saeed Anwar, SRT takes the field whenever he scores a century (if India is batting 1st). If you want more, post more nonsense.

well idk bout that stat u gave me wit 71 percent winning ratio but on dat last part i wana say that wen u bat first there is no pressure and dats how sachin made thoese hundred and it equals to 71 percent winning but u see wen batting second sachin couldnt handle the pressure to carry out his century and make india win the match so :giggle:

[Guest Hiten.]

A simple 50 from Inzi was enough to guarantee us a win :P Same for Anwar Sachin`s 29% centuires resulting in a losing cause is a huge amount considering the no. of them he`s scored :P

That itself is the problem in your logic. Tendulkar has scored almost the same number of 100s in loses compared to Maualana Anwar mia in his career.

[satishg]

replying to retards make us look like retards!

[Pak_Fan_4_Eva]

When they were head to head, Anwar`s centuries had a higher win ratio :P Doesn`t matter who scored more. It`s the end result that matters

[DomainK]

A simple 50 from Inzi was enough to guarantee us a win :P Same for Anwar Sachin`s 29% centuires resulting in a losing cause is a huge amount considering the no. of them he`s scored :P

Inzamam has 10 100s, 7 in winning= 70%. If he had scored as many as Sachin did (which he could not do in 10 lifetimes), he would have scored as many 100s in losing causes.

[okko321]

When they were head to head, Anwar`s centuries had a higher win ratio :P Doesn`t matter who scored more. It`s the end result that matters

i agree wit u once more that its the end result that matter good point man

[nikred]

Inzamam has 10 100s' date=' 7 in winning= 70%. If he had scored as many as Sachin did (which he could not do in 10 lifetimes), he would have scored as many 100s in losing causes.[/quote'] That means Aloo has 30% of centuries in losing cause while tendu has 29%. :dontknow:

[Sachinism]

Quality innings. Why didn't we finish :((

[Pak_Fan_4_Eva]

Only 3 on Inzi`s centuries ended in a losing casue. That`s nothing compared to the 12 by Sachin`s :P

[DomainK]

Only 3 on Inzi`s centuries ended in a losing casue. That`s nothing compared to the 12 by Sachin`s :P

Your best batsman scored 10 centuries in a whole career?:hehe: Now stop trolling in my thread.:whack:

[The Outsider]

Only 3 on Inzi`s centuries ended in a losing casue. That`s nothing compared to the 12 by Sachin`s :P

And 100% of Gillespie's centuries and double centuries were in a winning cause.

[Ram]

The result is immaterial. This is just one those numerous series’ that will fade from our memories like clouds do when sunrays fall on them. The innings however, will leave a lasting impression on all true fans of cricket, irrespective of where your loyalties lie. From a pure fans’ perspective, this is arguably one of the more memorable days in the history of Indian cricket.

[champ]

phew .. what a match .. stop lamenting that u have pains of loss and crap .. this innings just surpasses all that happened in the match .. and our team has just shown what they are really capable of .. the momentum is with us now .. we are just going to get better from here on and win the series .. this is really gonna happen :yay: :yay: :two_thumbs_up:

[nikred]

The result is immaterial. This is just one those numerous series’ that will fade from our memories like clouds do when sunrays fall on them. The innings however, will leave a lasting impression on all true fans of cricket, irrespective of where your loyalties lie. From a pure fans’ perspective, this is arguably one of the more memorable days in the history of Indian cricket.

Morris, getting poetic out of pain. :blink:

[riya]

I am not that disappointed.My only wish was Tendulkar play well,just to show it to those who mock him as a poor chaser of 300+ scores.He did that in unbelivable fashion.I am happy really happy,i don't care about the result.

[CSK Fan]

Only 3 on Inzi`s centuries ended in a losing casue. That`s nothing compared to the 12 by Sachin`s :P

On the other hand, only 7 of Inzi's century was in a match won. Nothing compared to 30+ by Sachin

[Pak_Fan_4_Eva]

I`ve not even started on Yousuf yet :D 14 of his 15 centuries have ended in us winning:two_thumbs_up: Let`s give it a rest now. On the topic: Sachin played a brilliant innings and I enjoyed it immensely. Can`t take anything away from one the greats of this game.:hatsoff: