urbestfriend Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 Is it the first time a team scored in excess of 300 in both innings and still faced innings defeat? Stats please Link to comment
DomainK Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 Hmmm, very interesting question. Link to comment
flamy Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 2 consecutive innings defeats :rotfl: toss ko toss maar :finger: Link to comment
THX_1138 Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 multan 20004? did our dear neighbors manage 300 in both innings? Link to comment
mhr123 Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 No its 861 (both inngs) by England vs Aussies at leeds and Still they lost Match totals Team Runs Descending Wkts Balls Ave RPO Result Opposition Ground Start Date England 861 18 1795 47.83 2.87 lost v Australia Leeds 22 Jul 1948 investigate this query England 817 20 1431 40.85 3.42 lost v Australia Adelaide 14 Jan 1921 investigate this query Australia 804 20 1221 40.20 3.95 lost v South Africa Adelaide 7 Jan 1911 investigate this query England 800 20 1472 40.00 3.26 lost v Australia Lord's 27 Jun 1930 investigate this query England 776 20 1810 38.80 2.57 lost v Australia Melbourne 8 Mar 1929 investigate this query Pakistan 774 18 1459 43.00 3.18 lost v Australia Melbourne 29 Dec 1972 investigate this query Australia 770 20 1582 38.50 2.92 lost v England Sydney 11 Dec 1903 investigate this query England 769 20 1955 38.45 2.36 lost v Australia Melbourne 1 Jan 1925 investigate this query Australia 752 20 1443 37.60 3.12 lost v England Sydney 14 Dec 1894 investigate this query Australia 752 20 1100 37.60 4.10 lost v India Adelaide 12 Dec 2003 investigate this query Australia 748 20 2080 37.40 2.15 lost v England Melbourne 29 Dec 1928 investigate this query India 742 20 1255 37.10 3.54 lost v Australia Sydney 2 Jan 2008 investigate this query India 732 19 1227 38.52 3.57 lost v Australia Perth 16 Dec 1977 investigate this query Australia 729 20 1742 36.45 2.51 lost v South Africa Melbourne 6 Feb 1953 investigate this query England 728 20 1828 36.40 2.38 lost v Australia Adelaide 16 Jan 1925 investigate this query Pakistan 726 20 1586 36.30 2.74 lost v West Indies Georgetown 13 Mar 1958 investigate this query New Zealand 722 20 1343 36.10 3.22 lost v England Lord's 20 May 2004 investigate this query South Africa 720 20 1762 36.00 2.45 lost v Australia Cape Town 31 Dec 1966 investigate this query India 714 20 1790 35.70 2.39 lost v Australia Adelaide 28 Jan 1978 investigate this query South Africa 713 20 1184 35.65 3.61 lost v England The Oval 4 Sep 2003 investigate this query South Africa 712 20 1452 35.60 2.94 lost v Australia Cape Town 8 Mar 2002 investigate this query Sri Lanka 711 18 1327 39.50 3.21 lost v Australia Colombo (SSC) 17 Aug 1992 investigate this query England 709 20 1414 35.45 3.00 lost v Australia Sydney 19 Dec 1924 investigate this query Australia 705 20 1871 35.25 2.26 lost v England Adelaide 1 Feb 1929 investigate this query [COLOR="Red"][B]Sri Lanka 702 20 1172 35.10 3.59 lost v India Mumbai (BS) 2 Dec 2009 [/B]investigate this query[/COLOR] West Indies 696 20 1250 34.80 3.34 lost v Australia Port of Spain 19 Apr 2003 investigate this query Australia 694 20 1175 34.70 3.54 lost v South Africa Perth 17 Dec 2008 investigate this query Pakistan 693 20 1137 34.65 3.65 lost v England Leeds 4 Aug 2006 investigate this query India 684 20 1144 34.20 3.58 lost v England Chennai 13 Jan 1985 investigate this query West Indies 683 20 1177 34.15 3.48 lost v England Lord's 22 Jul 2004 investigate this query Australia 681 20 1632 34.05 2.50 lost v England Melbourne 1 Mar 1895 investigate this query England 680 16 1446 42.50 2.82 lost v Australia Adelaide 1 Dec 2006 investigate this query India 678 20 1057 33.90 3.84 lost v England Lord's 26 Jul 1990 investigate this query Zimbabwe 677 20 1574 33.85 2.58 lost v South Africa Harare 7 Sep 2001 investigate this query West Indies 676 20 1273 33.80 3.18 lost v Australia Kingston 11 Jun 1955 investigate this query New Zealand 676 20 1915 33.80 2.11 lost v Pakistan Lahore 26 Oct 1955 investigate this query Australia 676 20 1465 33.80 2.76 lost v South Africa Adelaide 24 Jan 1964 investigate this query India 674 20 1780 33.70 2.27 lost v England Leeds 8 Jun 1967 investigate this query South Africa 672 20 1186 33.60 3.39 lost v Sri Lanka Colombo (PSS) 4 Aug 2006 investigate this query South Africa 666 20 1066 33.30 3.74 lost v England Johannesburg 13 Jan 2005 investigate this query England 665 20 1799 33.25 2.21 lost v South Africa Manchester 7 Jul 1955 investigate this query India 664 20 1364 33.20 2.92 lost v Pakistan Lahore 27 Oct 1978 investigate this query Australia 663 20 1335 33.15 2.97 lost v England Melbourne 1 Jan 1908 investigate this query India 663 20 1312 33.15 3.03 lost v Pakistan Bangalore 24 Mar 2005 investigate this query England 659 20 2064 32.95 1.91 lost v West Indies Nottingham 20 Jul 1950 investigate this query India 658 20 1614 32.90 2.44 lost v Australia Adelaide 23 Jan 1948 investigate this query India 658 20 1082 32.90 3.64 lost v Pakistan Faisalabad 3 Jan 1983 investigate this query Australia 657 20 1202 32.85 3.27 lost v India Kolkata 11 Mar 2001 investigate this query England 657 20 1261 32.85 3.12 lost v Australia Melbourne 26 Dec 2002 investigate this query Australia 657 20 1057 32.85 3.72 lost v West Indies St John's 9 May 2003 Link to comment
urbestfriend Posted December 6, 2009 Author Share Posted December 6, 2009 ^^^ Mate , I was asking about innings defeat .How many of them were innings defeat? ps: please provide the link. Link to comment
ViruRulez Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 Innings defeats in two consecutive tests is awesome and I am happy that we lost the toss in the second test as all the whining babies have also been pwned :yess::yay: Link to comment
DomainK Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 Innings defeats in two consecutive tests is awesome and I am happy that we lost the toss in the second test as all the whining babies have also been pwned :yess::yay: Yes. We needed to show that we could win irrespective of the toss. Some idiots tried to credit our Nagpur win to the toss saying that on an Indian wicket winning the toss means winning the match. Bloody jealous retards. Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 India has earned lot of innings defeat. In Pakistan 2. In England 1. Now 2. Link to comment
TSAG_RGB Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 http://www.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/62793.html Link to comment
varun Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/62793.html Edit: oops a little late That's the only other case btw Link to comment
The Outsider Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 varun, in the previous Aus-WI match, was that the only incident of a player scoring the sole hundred of the match and ending up losing by an innings? Link to comment
varun Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 varun' date=' in the previous Aus-WI match, was that the only incident of a player scoring the sole hundred of the match and ending up losing by an innings?[/quote'] Has happened 5 times. http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/62539.html http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63297.html http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63601.html http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63871.html http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/406189.html Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now