The Outsider Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 No, I am not talking about delusional Pakistani fans here. This is from a doctor who writes regularly for the leading cricket website. Wasn't Yousuf being missed when he was in ICL, wasn't Asif being missed when he was smoking opium? Just keep recycling garbage and is it supposed to become a finished product? I am flabbergasted upon reading this article - does delusion no know bounds? The same old garbage being peddled - XYZ does not have support from seniors, ABC does not have support from juniors, but a cheat who has been pivotal in creating many a heist in the team becoming the national captain is supposed turn them into world beaters? Drumbeats, warriors, cowards, leaders! What kind of a person would glorify cheats and schemers like Asif and Afridi as warriors and leaders!! Anyhow, more circus to watch, bring on the Afretard! :hysterical: http://blogs.cricinfo.com/pakspin/archives/2010/01/fear_and_dread_in_sydney.php A thrilling day of Test cricket has ended in dejection for Pakistan fans and deserved joy for Australia. I say ended, but the gloom set in as soon as Mohammad Yousuf put two fingers up to the warrior tradition of Pakistan cricket by setting a field for 800 for 8 instead of 80 for 8. Cricket is all about numbers and their interpretation, and Yousuf misinterpreted the numbers of hope and anticipation for the numbers of fear and dread. Captains are celebrated when they turn a match with a fortunate bowling change or a clever fielding position. When they fail it is often quite hard to pinpont the decisive moment unless it is an error at the toss. Yet, Yousuf did something remarkable. For a whole session he pursued such a glaringly flawed strategy that he killed Pakistan's ambitions of winning their first Test in Australia since the mid 1990s. He will always be remembered for it: glorious failures are the stuff of legend. What goes on inside Yousuf's head is something of a mystery. What motivates him? Why does he choose defence when the whole world would attack? As a younger batsman, he would launch an all-out batting assault at the most inappropriate moments. He must empathise with the rash strokemakers in his team because he has been one of them, and was perhaps among them again today. What goes on inside his head that he can blame his lofted drive for Pakistan's defeat, an uncontrolled moment, but seem oblivious to the two and half hours of stupidity that eased the pressure on Australia, played Australia into form, and allowed them a winning advantage? It is difficult to be too hard on the man. He blames himself enough, he hurts like the rest of us, and he does care. But is that enough to be captain of Pakistan? It is a position that Yousuf has coveted, and believed he was unfairly denied for too long. Sometimes, however, the ambitions of our hearts and heads overestimate the sum of our capabilities. A close observation of Yousuf's captaincy has been alarming viewing during this cricket season, defensive and uninspiring in the extreme, only serving to reinforce the suspicion that he is captain by default. This morning's session was Yousuf reverting to what he knows best at a time of pressure. At such moments are captains judged. Yousuf remains Pakistan's best Test batsman but the concern is that while the captaincy has delivered a newfound determination to his batting, it may have also made him less prolific. Is this a situation that Pakistan can afford with the national team's poverty of batting riches? Pakistan's problem is that alternatives are few. Younis Khan is out favour and out of love with the captaincy. Kamran Akmal has plenty of problems of his own before saddling him with another responsibility. Worse still, Yousuf doesn't have enough tactical support among his senior players and his management team. Pakistan captains have never turned to Intikhab Alam for advice, his non-interference is the reason they have always kept him. Even Waqar Younis, wonderful bowler that he was, found captaincy a struggle. Where does a rookie, naturally defensive captain find a mentor in the Pakistan camp? The answer is nowhere. It is every man for himself with the vultures circling for a kill. Yet is it Yousuf's fault that he was appointed to a post that is beyond his capabilities? That responsibility of course lies with the Pakistan Cricket Board, its chairman and selectors. These are the men, and their predecessors, who have grown fat on the largesse of administrative perks while the cricket team has withered at their whim. When your country's cricket structure boasts a spine of Ijaz Butt, Iqbal Qasim, Intikhab Alam, and Yousuf you probably don't need any further explanation. Who will hold these people accountable? Pakistan's cricket has been given a false veneer of progress by three factors. First is the excellence of Pakistan's bowling attack, which has developed into a major force over the last year. Second is the emergence of Umar Akmal to add some thrills to a declining batting order. Finally, New Zealand were poor and Australia have been below par too, keeping Pakistan's wobbling enterprise on the tracks. Nor is it that Pakistan's problems are new or unpredicted: The openers, namely Imran Farhat. The number three position and absence of Younis Khan. A tail that has forgotten how to wag, especially with failures from Misbah-ul-Haq and Kamran Akmal. Fielding and wicket keeping below top international standards. And a struggling captain. That's just about everything except the bowling. These areas of weakness have been obvious too, no stroke of genius to observe that Pakistan could do much better. The first disappointment is that this is not the best of Pakistan that has represented us Down Under in Test cricket. The second is that the selected players, with notable exceptions, failed to put on the show of their lives to win the final day for their country. It's not the defeat but the manner of it that will be etched painfully into the brain of every Pakistani supporter who saw it. Defeat from the mother of all jaws of victory. The deficiencies in batting, fielding, and wicketkeeping have been analysed to death. Change or improvement is required in all these areas. But the biggest loss that Pakistan has suffered is the loss of leaders on the pitch and in the dressing room. Umar, Mohammad Aamer, and Mohammad Asif deserve other warriors among them, and the top of my priority list would be recalls for Younis and Shahid Afridi. And if Younis is unwilling, for Yousuf is incapable, then the drum beats for Afridi's captaincy must be growing louder. Would you prefer a coward's death or a warrior's? As I've said before, this is the most critical period in the history of Pakistan cricket. It has to be all not nothingness.
Dravid Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 afridi for test captain.. :haha: the day has come rofl rofllllll
CSK Fan Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 They sound like a tribe stuck in stone age with their warriors sharpening their arrows and praying to the moon while the rest of the world has moved on to drones and nuclear bombs
DomainK Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 Pakistan team indeed has become a recycle bin. They just can't think straight. It's deep rooted somewhere in their characters. An Imran Nazir is adored as more talented than Sehwag. Retards like Afridi are worshiped. Pathetic players like Akmal go on playing for eternity. They just can't see their future in the likes of Aamer and Umar. They all live in a world that does not exist, worshiping those who are not worthy, always imagining conspiracies all around, always insecure and conspiring against what is current, always backing those who stabbed them in the past, always expecting what is impractical from those who are ordinary.
putrevus Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 "Pakistan's cricket has been given a false veneer of progress by three factors. First is the excellence of Pakistan's bowling attack, which has developed into a major force over the last year. Second is the emergence of Umar Akmal to add some thrills to a declining batting order. Finally, New Zealand were poor and Australia have been below par too, keeping Pakistan's wobbling enterprise on the tracks." Where is the excellence of bowling attack he is talking about, This is complete double standard from Padosi fans/journalist. When ever they dismiss a side cheaply they hail it as great bowling perfomance on their part.But when they get dismissed cheaply they simply say it is batting collapse giving no credit to opposition bowling attack. In all matches their so called great bowling attack have dismissed opposition cheaply, they were also bowled for a lower score. This so called great bowling attack had its chance to prove its worth two times last year first in srilanka when they were defending 492 with 150 over to bowl at opposition they couldn't do it, and last test against NZ they were saved by rain when NZ made 90 for no loss chasing 200.
The Outsider Posted January 6, 2010 Author Posted January 6, 2010 They sound like a tribe stuck in stone age with their warriors sharpening their arrows and praying to the moon while the rest of the world has moved on to drones and nuclear bombs :hysterical::hysterical:
DomainK Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 They sound like a tribe stuck in stone age with their warriors sharpening their arrows and praying to the moon while the rest of the world has moved on to drones and nuclear bombs :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Ram Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 There seems to be this inexplicable obsession about Afridi in Pakistan, a sort of a mad, unexplained love. I dont know how any matured cricket commentator can even suggest that Afridi be made the test captain. He's a fine T20 and an effective ODI player, but tests, that too as captain? When will Pakistan and its followers ever learn their lessons? How long will they put style over substance and keep propping up show-boaters like Afridi and Akhtar? What Pakistan does not need at the moment is an extra dosage of the same drug that has been killing them all along. They need a fresh start - A new coach, a new captain, a new management and a fresh and humble nucleus of players. Right after the T20 WC triumph, there was all this raving over Younis Khan's pathan traits and and tendencies and how he has been a great leader.. Now, he has fizzled out to the point where he is not even in the team. So, the next best alternative for the Paks is obviously Afridi. As an Indian fan, I am not complaining though. Afridi as Pakistan's captain is the best thing that can happen to the opposition team.
akshayxyz Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 Perhaps Poyzz have been taking this too literally - " increase bench strength" - by ensuring that even their front-line players are no better than their bench.
DomainK Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Dravid Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 pile it onnnnn baby:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
akshayxyz Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 "The only thing agressive about Moyo is his beard" .... :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical:
Dhondy Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 Shwetabh, you evil man, you beat me to it! Those were my exact same feelings when I read the article. Warriors? Afridi? WTF! Scary how similar our initial responses were.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now