Kriterion Posted February 4, 2010 Share Posted February 4, 2010 Monga states in his preview that India are no.1 simply because the ICC needs a no.1...a different comment from Chappell's "long term no.1", but similar in its insinuation. discuss... Link to comment
f.b.m Posted February 5, 2010 Share Posted February 5, 2010 Some people really don't get the rankings. Either that or they're thick, or retarded or Ian Chappell Link to comment
Mr. Wicket Posted February 5, 2010 Share Posted February 5, 2010 I repeat (for the umpteenth time). Sidharth Monga is a ****ing moron who should stop writing about cricket and **** off to write for English tabloids or third-rate TV shows in the USA. Link to comment
yoda Posted February 5, 2010 Share Posted February 5, 2010 ICC needs a #1, ICC needs a #8. Remove that need and then all teams become the same. :hehe: Link to comment
Zap_Brannigan Posted February 5, 2010 Share Posted February 5, 2010 Rod laver, Ivan lendl, Edberg, Sampras were all #1 because Federer wasnt playing then, so they dont deserve it. Discuss. Link to comment
Mr Eintstein Posted February 5, 2010 Share Posted February 5, 2010 no one is denying that india is number one RIGHT NOW. all they're saying is that india is not the best team is the world by a clear margin. same for when S.A was number one. Link to comment
dial_100 Posted February 5, 2010 Share Posted February 5, 2010 Wait until April 1. Once we get the price for being ranked #1. Then who cares. We will regain before next time. B-> Link to comment
Mr Eintstein Posted February 5, 2010 Share Posted February 5, 2010 Wait until April 1. Once we get the price for being ranked #1. Then who cares. We will regain before next time. B-> thats the thing. IF india win a crapload of series in succession, and keep winning, the world will slowly accept them as "the best team". the dominant australian and WI sides underwent the same process. easier said than done though. Link to comment
Gambit Posted February 5, 2010 Share Posted February 5, 2010 Isn't Monga the guy who cried his eyes out after we pounded the Aussies 2-0 two years ago? Link to comment
The Outsider Posted February 5, 2010 Share Posted February 5, 2010 Discuss? Discuss the fact that the writer does not even have a basic understanding of what a ranking system means? The fact that it's suddenly become fashionable to cast aspersions on the ICC ranking system after India has donned the mantle? Why wouldn't it be the case - write something against India and there are enough people to take the bait and give your website hits and revenue. Link to comment
hari504504 Posted February 5, 2010 Share Posted February 5, 2010 If anything this should charge the players up Its time to give the saffers a pasting and silence the critics like chappell,Monga etc Link to comment
coffee_rules Posted February 5, 2010 Share Posted February 5, 2010 This guy went ballistic when Aus B team won in India ODIs recently, but makes no mention of India C team winning B&H series in Australia in '08 and pee'ed on Gilchrist's farewell party. Link to comment
hari504504 Posted February 5, 2010 Share Posted February 5, 2010 This guy went ballistic when Aus B team won in India ODIs recently' date=' but makes no mention of India C team winning B&H series in Australia in '08 and pee'ed on Gilchrist's farewell party.[/quote'] Thinks all this can stop him from being curry bashed down under:hmmm: Link to comment
Bradman99 Posted February 5, 2010 Share Posted February 5, 2010 thats the thing. IF india win a crapload of series in succession, and keep winning, the world will slowly accept them as "the best team". the dominant australian and WI sides underwent the same process. easier said than done though. Spot on! That is exactly the way I see it. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now