Jump to content

Guess the player, if you can!


Recommended Posts

Posted

Here's a fast bowler, regarded as one of the finest of his time. Has a phenomenal career bowling average of under 23. Was a stellar performer with the ball against the best team of his era. But surprisingly, has a bowling average of more than 40 and an SR of more than 90 in the 4th innings of Test matches. It's just about guessing. It would be more fun if you guys don't use Cricinfo StatsGuru to find the answer. If there's no one able to answer it with 100% confidence, I'll reveal the name at 6:00 PM (IST) tonight. A small hint. He didn't make his debut in the 80's or the 90's. So that disqualifies all modern day bowlers (Ambrose, Walsh, Waqar, Akram, McGrath, Donald, McGrath, etc).

P.S. Before someone tries to derail the thread (which I'm absolutely sure of, cough**Patriot**cough), let me tell you that Tendulkar averages 36.72 with 3 centuries in 4th innings of Test matches. There's three batsman in the same era considered to be good/great who have lower/similar averages in the 4th innings of Test matches (Lara - 35.12, Inzi - 37.69, Sehwag - 30.33 ). Also, there have been specialist batsman in the past who made a name for themselves with similar career averages (Naseer Hussain, Michael Atherton). Hence, we can safely say that Tendulkar's batting average in the 4th innings of Test matches is at least Test standard. But the bowler whom I'm talking of has a bowling average of more than 40 and SR of more than 90 in 4th innings of Test matches. I don't think anyone of you will be able to find another bowler considered to be good/great with such a pathetic bowling average in 4th innings of Test matches. Nor has any specialist bowler made a name for himself by having a career bowling average of above 40.
Posted
Whats the prize :woot: Yeah final answer
All right, the prize is $1 (provided you have a PayPal account:--D). No, you're wrong. Wasim Akram doesn't even qualify. I said the bowler averages less than 23 overall. Akram averages more than 23.
Posted
Its 23.62, round about 23 only :--D. BTW is he a fast bowler or spinner
Fast bowler.
Glen Mcgrath :woot:
Nope. Mcgrath was a champion. Let me give you another hint. He didn't make his debut in the 80's or the 90's. So that disqualifies all modern day bowlers (Ambrose, Akram, Waqar, Donald, Walsh, Pollock, McGrath, etc). P.S. I've added the hint in the original post.
Posted
I am just 17 now, ont know aboyut previous legends :sniffle: Ok, i still give it a try Joel Garner, Andy Roberts, Malcolm Marshall :woot:
I won't reveal the answer till 6:00 PM (IST) tonight. So won't comment on anyone's guess on whether it's right or wrong. And I'm 23, I missed cricket in the 70's and 80's as well. I got hooked to the game from 1996.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...