robetlndis Posted June 4, 2010 Posted June 4, 2010 Let's not lie to ourselves, Football is the greatest sport in the US right now, but no one gives a crap about Rugby or even Soccer. Baseball is in 2nd place, and no one gives a crap about Cricket. What would the sport of Cricket have to change in order to be as popular as Baseball in America? For example, what types of rule changes? and an extra question, Which sport is better? And if Baseball is truly better, why does Cricket continue to exist?
Gunner_Mania Posted June 4, 2010 Posted June 4, 2010 Let's not lie to ourselves, Football is the greatest sport in the US right now, but no one gives a crap about Rugby or even Soccer. Baseball is in 2nd place, and no one gives a crap about Cricket. What would the sport of Cricket have to change in order to be as popular as Baseball in America? For example, what types of rule changes? and an extra question, Which sport is better? And if Baseball is truly better, why does Cricket continue to exist? *beep* wrong forum
f.b.m Posted June 4, 2010 Posted June 4, 2010 For example, what types of rule changes? Just a couple of suggestions: - Maybe a hitting zone - Round bats - Probably a pro 35 revolution You really need to watch the ipl bro.
Sachinism Posted June 4, 2010 Posted June 4, 2010 Why can't two sports co-exist? If they are so similar, why do Yanks have so much difficulty in understanding cricket? Baseball is unbelievably boring, its OK to play, but so so boring to watch. All those breaks, kinda like football (American football) way too many stoppages. Maybe we need to make cricket even more boring, add extra breaks in play. Oh wait IPL strategic timeouts
Serani Posted June 4, 2010 Posted June 4, 2010 I think the real question is....why does cricket need to be popular in the USA? answer...it doesnt.
Riley's Girl Posted June 4, 2010 Posted June 4, 2010 I think the real question is....why does cricket need to be popular in the USA? answer...it doesnt. OMG, I actually agree with you on something! :yay: Who needs America to like cricket? Let them stick to games that are popular in... well mostly only in America.
mastana Posted June 4, 2010 Posted June 4, 2010 What does the sport of CRICKET have to do to be popular in the USA? Hire Lalit Modi. :bow:
Serani Posted June 4, 2010 Posted June 4, 2010 Really can never understand the obsession of America one day magically liking cricket despite the fact the average IQ of the population must be under 80 leaving it impossible for them to actually understand cricket. They like Nascar for gods sake, cars going round in a circle! they clearly have no idea.
yoda Posted June 4, 2010 Posted June 4, 2010 Really can never understand the obsession of America one day magically liking cricket despite the fact the average IQ of the population must be under 80 leaving it impossible for them to actually understand cricket. That's right...if the world's most powerful superpower has avg IQ less than 80, what does it say about the rest of the world, especially about a country in Europe which is practically it's slave? :winky:
Serani Posted June 4, 2010 Posted June 4, 2010 Yeh that being a bit kind actually, im sure in Alabama, Louisiana, Tennesse and other retarded places its much lower.
Patriot_Nikhil Posted June 4, 2010 Posted June 4, 2010 Well its doubtful if cricket as we know it will be popular. Americans like to modify existing sports to make it suitable for them and then conduct national level championships all the while calling it a "World Championship"... They did it with baseball from cricket (which English played), did it with Football (from rugby), did it with Nascar and Indy 500 (from F1)... So potentially, they may come up with a even more modified version of cricket and play a "world Championship" between cities... :winky:
coffee_rules Posted June 4, 2010 Posted June 4, 2010 Why should cricket be made popular in America? The OP is like asking -- What does the sport of CURLING have to do to be popular in the India?
Mr Eintstein Posted June 5, 2010 Posted June 5, 2010 Why are they wasting time and money on the USA's already bloated sporting market? There's plenty of places with more potential and less competition than america. Why not try push it through in more african nations or something. There's simply no room for cricket in the US.
satishg Posted June 5, 2010 Posted June 5, 2010 Cricket does not need USA, it is the other way around my friend. NBA is the only good game you guys have and please dont even start with the comparison between baseball and cricket.
SJS50 Posted June 5, 2010 Posted June 5, 2010 Why do we want cricket to be "popular" in the USA? (I assume we are talking about popularity amongst those besides the Indians, Pakistanis, Sri Lankans etc) This is exactly the kind of ideas some so called cricket administrators had which led the game in exactly the wrong direction to start with. If the problem is that we are not able to sustain the interest of those who live in cricket playing countries, it is those countries and their populace that should have been the concern. The way to popularise a sport is not to keep finding newer markets even when the traditional one's are deserting it (if so) but to find the reasons why and address them. Even that simple thing could not be understood properly by the morons who ran the game from Lord's in the sixties. The problem of dropping interest in Test matches as well as the poor finances of many counties had to be addressed by looking at what was wrong with the Test match format and making some changes in that (besides a better model for sharing the spoils amongst those who depended upon whatever money the game was generating. But those idiots decided that it was better to forget the problem with Test matches and think of a new format all together. This is like the American auto industry, finding itself losing out to more fuel efficient cars deciding not to do anything about their huge SUV's but deciding to make small two seaters and then finding that the Japs and the Koreans made even two seaters better, dumping the two seaters and making bikes. The analogy is slightly off because I do not think of cricket as a product and running the game as a profit making enterprise but I think this is what people understand a bit better. The game, as it stands, needs to be made more popular with the existing markets and this is THE main objective of any sports body for unlike the car manufacturers, they are not into just money making where the Tatas can jump from steel to salt to cement to automobiles to lipstick and so on. Why not let BCCI (and Modi-Pawar-Manohar et el) run football, hockey, tennis, kabaddi, basketball etc etc in India in that case and let the best sport(one or more) amongst these, alongwith cricket then survive based purely on the bottom line. Because that is all this line of thinking must eventually lead to ;-)
Texy Posted June 5, 2010 Posted June 5, 2010 T20 is the only form of Cricket that will ever be popular in US... .no one has patience or time for the other formats Cricket is actually making a progress here.... 10 yrs ago....the only reference to "cricket" would have been the insect but nowadays cricket as a sport is slowly being known here by the masses... recently it has been used as a reference in popular tv sitcoms and movies. Remember soccer took YEARS to become popular and still today is not a mainstream sport America has a sporting culture completely different from rest of the world..it's quite unique in its way and will be popular for a long long time.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now