gloryof83 Posted October 19, 2010 Posted October 19, 2010 How to prove Inzi is better than Laxman using padosi lahori logic Inzi has played more match-winning knocks.. he may not have scored 100s or 50s while doing so but mashallah he has played some great match winning knocks. A master of the ODI run-chases Better captain than VVS His phantastic ability to produce match-winning knocks on a consistent basis. Comparing laxman with Inzi is haram… Laxman is a poor man Ijaz Ahmed. Inzi is the best batsman against phaast bowlers if some one bring up his actual stats against Aus / SA.. counter with Against Australia, he struggled against Warne the most and against Mcgrath. Mcgrath bowls medium, so he is not a real meat eating phaast bowler. Australia's real phaast bowler Brett Lee only took his wicket only once in test cricket. Against SA, he was troubled by Ntini's unusual angle which is haram and Pollock's line and length which is also haram. SA's real phaast bowler Alan Donald only took his wicket once in test cricket. [*]Inzi had to carry a WEAK batting line up, an inexperienced team while being caaptaan. All VVS had to do was loaft around the field. [*]In the era of great phaast bowlers (90s) Laxman only averages 23 against Aus(Mcgrath/Warne),23 against Pakistan(Wasim/Waqar), 23 against SA(Donald/Pallak),18 against SL, 28 against WI(Ambrose/Walsh) if anyone brings up the fact that VVS only played 16 tests in the 90s counter with… So you want to exclude all series where Laxman struggled and was exposed by great meat eating phaast bowlers and inlude all flat tracks series in 2000s .....Inzimam never had a chance of playing Aussies at home in 2000s to make his stats look better.....Laxman was crap against all great phase bowler. The defence rests.
Jersey #10 Posted October 19, 2010 Posted October 19, 2010 :rotfl: My predictions: This kid will get PWNED and then banned! First scar and then salt to top it off
The Outsider Posted October 19, 2010 Posted October 19, 2010 What is the point of this thread? You want to discuss padosi, Lahori logic do it on their forums. PS : Moving to Chit Chat, since it is about the discussion of Lahori logic rather than any cricket views of the poster himself.
Rajiv Posted October 20, 2010 Posted October 20, 2010 I think its better to add some warning pts for this padosi site crap, we dont give a damn abt what others think
EnterTheVoid Posted October 20, 2010 Posted October 20, 2010 How to prove Inzi is better than Laxman using padosi lahori logic Inzi has played more match-winning knocks.. he may not have scored 100s or 50s while doing so but mashallah he has played some great match winning knocks. A master of the ODI run-chases Better captain than VVS His phantastic ability to produce match-winning knocks on a consistent basis. Comparing laxman with Inzi is haram… Laxman is a poor man Ijaz Ahmed. Inzi is the best batsman against phaast bowlers if some one bring up his actual stats against Aus / SA.. counter with Against Australia, he struggled against Warne the most and against Mcgrath. Mcgrath bowls medium, so he is not a real meat eating phaast bowler. Australia's real phaast bowler Brett Lee only took his wicket only once in test cricket. Against SA, he was troubled by Ntini's unusual angle which is haram and Pollock's line and length which is also haram. SA's real phaast bowler Alan Donald only took his wicket once in test cricket. [*]Inzi had to carry a WEAK batting line up, an inexperienced team while being caaptaan. All VVS had to do was loaft around the field. [*]In the era of great phaast bowlers (90s) Laxman only averages 23 against Aus(Mcgrath/Warne),23 against Pakistan(Wasim/Waqar), 23 against SA(Donald/Pallak),18 against SL, 28 against WI(Ambrose/Walsh) if anyone brings up the fact that VVS only played 16 tests in the 90s counter with… So you want to exclude all series where Laxman struggled and was exposed by great meat eating phaast bowlers and inlude all flat tracks series in 2000s .....Inzimam never had a chance of playing Aussies at home in 2000s to make his stats look better.....Laxman was crap against all great phase bowler. The defence rests. LOL, :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Roshanrocks Posted October 20, 2010 Posted October 20, 2010 Inzamam was also prone to getting run out by other batsmen. who knows what his average would have been if he werent run out so often
Clarke Posted October 20, 2010 Posted October 20, 2010 Do we need threads on what happens in a mental hospital :hmmmm2:
gloryof83 Posted October 20, 2010 Author Posted October 20, 2010 and I thought people would see the funny side.... FMD
Cricket_Guru Posted October 20, 2010 Posted October 20, 2010 am sure you people treating this as a joke due to the status of this thread and where its been adopted from, and not on what the point is!
Sir john Posted October 20, 2010 Posted October 20, 2010 am sure you people treating this as a joke due to the status of this thread and where its been adopted from' date=' and not on what the point is![/quote'] guru bhai jaan, you know that its forum of blue brigades fan. so these type of question are crap here.:nervous:
Recommended Posts