velu Posted August 28, 2012 Posted August 28, 2012 Yes, Company A makes a 4 door car, Company B makes a 4 door car. Company A says, you copied my design BTW, Veliu - I read that you work for Samsung? Are you a Salesman - like in a store or something, if yes, where? i am not a salesman :mad: but we use to have discounts for mobiles and consumer electronics but now we get discounts only for consumer electronics.. but people who can argue/negotiate well can get it for same price in the stores I don't know, I read somewhere he works for Samsung! Company insider would never indulge in such sensitive stuff unless he has a waiver But I am fan of their products, thus asking if he is a Salesman, coz they don't really have to worry about such stuff, and I can get him good business, commission $$ no Rajiv, watever the patents that i posted that infringes apple's are available for the public.. it was apple who filed that samsung infringes those patents , few months back motorola agreed publicly that they infringed few of those apples patents
velu Posted August 28, 2012 Posted August 28, 2012 How? :hmmm: He was bit curious to know whether I work at his office when I made a guess about his office earlier this year. :cantstop: Numb works in same office. @Velu : Be careful. :P will send him a PM :icflove: i know another guy who has ICF account , but he is barely active
Crookbond Posted August 28, 2012 Posted August 28, 2012 Nokia is benefiting from the fight between Apple and Samsung. Their share prices went up by more than 10% following the verdict. The real benefactor is Microsoft and not Nokia.
Rajiv Posted August 28, 2012 Posted August 28, 2012 Take this :bumsmack: your lawyer is a dominatrix! p.S - ppl come here for time pass, not sure how u got into retracting statements and all.
Crookbond Posted August 28, 2012 Posted August 28, 2012 your lawyer is a dominatrix! p.S - ppl come here for time pass, not sure how u got into retracting statements and all. You think I really meant you should "take back your statement" and put it on the ICF banner. Na na :headshake: Btw, that still does not make sense in the real world. You can not get any damages based on design.
Crookbond Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 Samsung Pays Apple $1 Billion Sending 30 Trucks Full of 5 Cents Coins http://en.paperblog.com/samsung-pays-apple-1-billion-sending-30-trucks-full-of-5-cents-coins-294795/ Apple trolled by Samsung! :hysterical: But, even this idea is copied by Samsung! :haha:
chanakya Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 Google Sues Apple... Ah well Google Mobility for the win :D
Lurker Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 Legendary American company based in America's technological heart-throb area, employing thousands of Americans, in a down economy, still making Americans chant how they produce the best in the world won in an American court against a Korean company. What a surprise!!!
velu Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 Meanwhile in seoul :cantstop: Seoul court rules Samsung didn't violate Apple design Samsung Electronics Co's <005930.KS> flagship Galaxy smartphone looks very similar to Apple's iPhone, but the South Korean firm has not violated the iPhone design, a Seoul court ruled on Friday. The South Korean ruling comes as the two technology titans are locked in a high-stakes global patent battle that mirrors a fierce rivalry for industry supremacy between two companies that control more than half the world's smartphone sales. The Seoul court ruling on Friday comes ahead of more crucial U.S. verdicts. Nine jurors began deliberation on Wednesday in California in one of many disputes between the two firms around the world that analysts see as partly aimed at curbing the spread of Google Inc's Android, the world's most used mobile software. "There are lots of external design similarities between the iPhone and Galaxy S, such as rounded corners and large screens ... but these similarities had been documented in previous products," a judge at the Seoul Central District Court said on Friday. "Given that it's very limited to make big design changes in touch-screen based mobile products in general ... and the defendant (Samsung) differentiated its products with three buttons in the front and adopted different designs in camera and (on the) side, the two products have a different look," the judge said. The judge said it was difficult to say that consumers would confuse the iPhone with the Galaxy given they clearly have the respective company logos on the back of each model, and consumers also factor in operating systems, brand, applications, price, and services when buying a phone. The judge ordered Samsung to immediately stop selling 10 products, including the Galaxy S II, and also banned sales of four Apple products, including the iPhone 4 and iPad 2. The court ruled that Apple infringed on two of Samsung's wireless technology patents and was ordered to pay Samsung 40 million won. Samsung was fined 25 million won for violating one patent relating to so-called bouncing-back function used when scrolling electronic documents. The compensation sought by both Apple and Samsung in South Korea is small due to the relatively small size of the market. The wrangle was triggered by Apple's lawsuit in April last year claiming Samsung slavishly copied Apple's smartphones and tablets. Samsung has countered that it simply developed its own "unique" products in a bid to "best the competition," and that Apple actually owes money for using its patented technology. In the United States, Apple is demanding more than $2.5 billion in damages and an order to permanently ban Samsung from selling patent-infringing products. Samsung argues Apple owes $422 million for violating a clutch of its patents. Neither Apple nor Samsung had an immediate comment on the Seoul ruling. In Seoul, Samsung shares last traded down 1.3 percent, in line with the broader market. seoul verdict came before the US one :hysterical::hysterical: SRC
Trichromatic Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 Meanwhile in seoul :cantstop: seoul verdict came before the US one :hysterical::hysterical: SRC They must have bribed the judges. If that's not the case then judges must have been blind to say that Samsung copied UI of Apple. :giggle:
velu Posted August 30, 2012 Posted August 30, 2012 Numb works in same office. @Velu : Be careful. :P he will be joining soon :winky: he is a fresher :yay:
Recommended Posts