Trichromatic Posted December 11, 2011 Posted December 11, 2011 It is shameful that through the whole series not one commentator has even mentioned DRS. Gagged by the BCCI no doubt. Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk DRS is banned word in commentary box. :giggle: Another rubbish decision. All stumps are visible and batsman is out LBW. ICC stole the game from India by poor decisions of Kohli and Raina. Now this game has been robbed from windies.
Magneto Posted December 11, 2011 Posted December 11, 2011 Asnani is a shame. This is as pathetic as it gets. Hope this becomes a close match with Pollard hitting a slobberknocker.
ganeshran Posted December 11, 2011 Posted December 11, 2011 Third howler of the day. There were only 2
Trichromatic Posted December 11, 2011 Posted December 11, 2011 There were only 2 LBW appeal by Sharma? That was out.
saneindian Posted December 11, 2011 Posted December 11, 2011 The umpires in my gully cricket are perhaps better than these jokers. Asnani is known to be crap even in domestic cricket. Wonder how he moved to the int'l level.
ViruRulez Posted December 11, 2011 Posted December 11, 2011 Sorry but hawkeye and DRS are still lot better than none. This match proves it yet again. I agree that DRS or hawkeye might not be perfect but they are still far better than none.
Lord Posted December 17, 2011 Posted December 17, 2011 will UDRS be used for Aus tests?in England it was used partially,will that be continued here,with just HotSpot being used??
Stuge Posted December 17, 2011 Posted December 17, 2011 you seriously believe bcci has Brain Balls to use it ?
saneindian Posted December 17, 2011 Posted December 17, 2011 No it's not going to be there. BCCI doesn't like it.
Lord Posted December 17, 2011 Posted December 17, 2011 Why u ask a silly queastian mon? why is it a silly question?it was used in England series
cowboysfan Posted December 17, 2011 Posted December 17, 2011 You just sachin will be the first recepient of a bad decision,thats the way cricket go(new meme,thanks ron washington)
cowboysfan Posted December 17, 2011 Posted December 17, 2011 why is it a silly question?it was used in England series Icc caved under pressure from its master the bcci.
Lord Posted December 17, 2011 Posted December 17, 2011 really hope its there.otherwise it could be Sydney 2008 all over again
cowboysfan Posted December 17, 2011 Posted December 17, 2011 really hope its there.otherwise it could be Sydney 2008 all over again Thats the way cricket go,you can count on it.
ganeshran Posted December 17, 2011 Posted December 17, 2011 UDRS should be there but without the horrendous Eagle eye. It got two decisions wrong in the 2nd test and both could have altered the end result of the game. Just use replays and eliminate obvious edges on LBWs, pitched outside leg and deflection on catches. These three categories would eliminate most of the umpiring errors.
Old guy Posted December 17, 2011 Posted December 17, 2011 UDRS should be there but without the horrendous Eagle eye. It got two decisions wrong in the 2nd test and both could have altered the end result of the game. Just use replays and eliminate obvious edges on LBWs, pitched outside leg and deflection on catches. These three categories would eliminate most of the umpiring errors. this.:two_thumbs_up:
cricketbash Posted December 17, 2011 Posted December 17, 2011 UDRS is stupid..How can you implement technology, if it is and inconclusive and worse still, faulty. Hotspot technology is found wanting, ball tracking is inaccurate. uncle snicko has not been adapted at all.. I'm with BCCI.. Let umpires do, what they been doing best for years.. Moreover, the human element adds to the uncertainty & intrigue, making the game more enjoyable.. Why do you want to see mechanized, robotic stuff? There are bound to be controversies, when a batsman is given out incorrectly, but it's all part of the game.. Isn't it? Technology is good for enhancing viewing pleasure, but it can't be implemented if it is gonna be inconclusive.. DArE speAk MorE? :finger:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now